Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: The living systematic review (LSR) is an emerging approach for improved evidence synthesis that uses continual updating to include relevant new evidence as soon as it is published. The objectives of this study are to: 1) assess the methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Assem M. Khamis, Lara A. Kahale, Hector Pardo-Hernandez, Holger J. Schünemann, Elie A. Akl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2019-07-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/8-221/v2
id doaj-c65ab95d35fe4114b7d9b8a8771837c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c65ab95d35fe4114b7d9b8a8771837c82020-11-25T03:43:49ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022019-07-01810.12688/f1000research.18005.221676Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]Assem M. Khamis0Lara A. Kahale1Hector Pardo-Hernandez2Holger J. Schünemann3Elie A. Akl4Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonAUB GRADE Center, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonIberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, CanadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonBackground: The living systematic review (LSR) is an emerging approach for improved evidence synthesis that uses continual updating to include relevant new evidence as soon as it is published. The objectives of this study are to: 1) assess the methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews using a living study approach; and 2) describe the life cycle of living systematic reviews, i.e., describe the changes over time to their methods and findings. Methods: For objective 1, we will begin by conducting a cross-sectional survey and then update its findings every 6 months by including newly published LSRs. For objective 2, we will conduct a prospective longitudinal follow-up of the cohort of included LSRs. To identify LSRs, we will continually search the following electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. We will also contact groups conducting LSRs to identify eligible studies that we might have missed. We will follow the standard systematic review methodology for study selection and data abstraction. For each LSR update, we will abstract information on the following: 1) general characteristics, 2) systematic review methodology, 3) living approach methodology, 4) results, and 5) editorial and publication processes. We will update the findings of both the surveys and the longitudinal follow-up of included LSRs every 6 months. In addition, we will identify articles addressing LSR methods to be included in an ‘LSR methods repository’. Conclusion: The proposed living methodological survey will allow us to monitor how the methods of conduct, and reporting as well as the findings of LSRs change over time. Ultimately this should help with ensuring the quality and transparency of LSRs.https://f1000research.com/articles/8-221/v2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Assem M. Khamis
Lara A. Kahale
Hector Pardo-Hernandez
Holger J. Schünemann
Elie A. Akl
spellingShingle Assem M. Khamis
Lara A. Kahale
Hector Pardo-Hernandez
Holger J. Schünemann
Elie A. Akl
Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
author_facet Assem M. Khamis
Lara A. Kahale
Hector Pardo-Hernandez
Holger J. Schünemann
Elie A. Akl
author_sort Assem M. Khamis
title Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Background: The living systematic review (LSR) is an emerging approach for improved evidence synthesis that uses continual updating to include relevant new evidence as soon as it is published. The objectives of this study are to: 1) assess the methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews using a living study approach; and 2) describe the life cycle of living systematic reviews, i.e., describe the changes over time to their methods and findings. Methods: For objective 1, we will begin by conducting a cross-sectional survey and then update its findings every 6 months by including newly published LSRs. For objective 2, we will conduct a prospective longitudinal follow-up of the cohort of included LSRs. To identify LSRs, we will continually search the following electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. We will also contact groups conducting LSRs to identify eligible studies that we might have missed. We will follow the standard systematic review methodology for study selection and data abstraction. For each LSR update, we will abstract information on the following: 1) general characteristics, 2) systematic review methodology, 3) living approach methodology, 4) results, and 5) editorial and publication processes. We will update the findings of both the surveys and the longitudinal follow-up of included LSRs every 6 months. In addition, we will identify articles addressing LSR methods to be included in an ‘LSR methods repository’. Conclusion: The proposed living methodological survey will allow us to monitor how the methods of conduct, and reporting as well as the findings of LSRs change over time. Ultimately this should help with ensuring the quality and transparency of LSRs.
url https://f1000research.com/articles/8-221/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT assemmkhamis methodsofconductandreportingoflivingsystematicreviewsaprotocolforalivingmethodologicalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved
AT laraakahale methodsofconductandreportingoflivingsystematicreviewsaprotocolforalivingmethodologicalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved
AT hectorpardohernandez methodsofconductandreportingoflivingsystematicreviewsaprotocolforalivingmethodologicalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved
AT holgerjschunemann methodsofconductandreportingoflivingsystematicreviewsaprotocolforalivingmethodologicalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved
AT elieaakl methodsofconductandreportingoflivingsystematicreviewsaprotocolforalivingmethodologicalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved
_version_ 1724518088800468992