Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression

Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid tumors. The rapid progression of PDAC results in an advanced stage of patients when diagnosed. However, the dynamic molecular mechanism underlying PDAC progression remains far from clear. Methods The microarray...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zongfu Pan, Lu Li, Qilu Fang, Yiwen Zhang, Xiaoping Hu, Yangyang Qian, Ping Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:Cancer Cell International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12935-018-0718-5
id doaj-c66ce5e079d54022913386bf36843b35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c66ce5e079d54022913386bf36843b352020-11-25T02:21:31ZengBMCCancer Cell International1475-28672018-12-0118111810.1186/s12935-018-0718-5Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progressionZongfu Pan0Lu Li1Qilu Fang2Yiwen Zhang3Xiaoping Hu4Yangyang Qian5Ping Huang6Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang UniversityDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer HospitalKey Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Cancer HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer HospitalAbstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid tumors. The rapid progression of PDAC results in an advanced stage of patients when diagnosed. However, the dynamic molecular mechanism underlying PDAC progression remains far from clear. Methods The microarray GSE62165 containing PDAC staging samples was obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal tissue and PDAC of different stages were profiled using R software, respectively. The software program Short Time-series Expression Miner was applied to cluster, compare, and visualize gene expression differences between PDAC stages. Then, function annotation and pathway enrichment of DEGs were conducted by Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. Further, the Cytoscape plugin DyNetViewer was applied to construct the dynamic protein–protein interaction networks and to analyze different topological variation of nodes and clusters over time. The phosphosite markers of stage-specific protein kinases were predicted by PhosphoSitePlus database. Moreover, survival analysis of candidate genes and pathways was performed by Kaplan–Meier plotter. Finally, candidate genes were validated by immunohistochemistry in PDAC tissues. Results Compared with normal tissues, the total DEGs number for each PDAC stage were 994 (stage I), 967 (stage IIa), 965 (stage IIb), 1027 (stage III), 925 (stage IV), respectively. The stage-course gene expression analysis showed that 30 distinct expressional models were clustered. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis indicated that the up-regulated DEGs were commonly enriched in five fundamental pathways throughout five stages, including pathways in cancer, small cell lung cancer, ECM-receptor interaction, amoebiasis, focal adhesion. Except for amoebiasis, these pathways were associated with poor PDAC overall survival. Meanwhile, LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2, COL4A1 and FN1 were commonly shared by these five pathways and were unfavorable factors for prognosis. Furthermore, by constructing the stage-course dynamic protein interaction network, 45 functional molecular modules and 19 nodes were identified as featured regulators for all PDAC stages, among which the collagen family and integrins were considered as two main regulators for facilitating aggressive progression. Additionally, the clinical relevance analysis suggested that the stage IV featured nodes MLF1IP and ITGB4 were significantly correlated with shorter overall survival. Moreover, 15 stage-specific protein kinases were identified from the dynamic network and CHEK1 was particularly activated at stage IV. Experimental validation showed that MLF1IP, LAMA3 and LAMB3 were progressively increased from tumor initiation to progression. Conclusions Our study provided a view for a better understanding of the dynamic landscape of molecular interaction networks during PDAC progression and offered potential targets for therapeutic intervention.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12935-018-0718-5Dynamic molecular networksPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaProgressionBioinformatics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zongfu Pan
Lu Li
Qilu Fang
Yiwen Zhang
Xiaoping Hu
Yangyang Qian
Ping Huang
spellingShingle Zongfu Pan
Lu Li
Qilu Fang
Yiwen Zhang
Xiaoping Hu
Yangyang Qian
Ping Huang
Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
Cancer Cell International
Dynamic molecular networks
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Progression
Bioinformatics
author_facet Zongfu Pan
Lu Li
Qilu Fang
Yiwen Zhang
Xiaoping Hu
Yangyang Qian
Ping Huang
author_sort Zongfu Pan
title Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
title_short Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
title_full Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
title_fullStr Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
title_sort analysis of dynamic molecular networks for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
publisher BMC
series Cancer Cell International
issn 1475-2867
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid tumors. The rapid progression of PDAC results in an advanced stage of patients when diagnosed. However, the dynamic molecular mechanism underlying PDAC progression remains far from clear. Methods The microarray GSE62165 containing PDAC staging samples was obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal tissue and PDAC of different stages were profiled using R software, respectively. The software program Short Time-series Expression Miner was applied to cluster, compare, and visualize gene expression differences between PDAC stages. Then, function annotation and pathway enrichment of DEGs were conducted by Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. Further, the Cytoscape plugin DyNetViewer was applied to construct the dynamic protein–protein interaction networks and to analyze different topological variation of nodes and clusters over time. The phosphosite markers of stage-specific protein kinases were predicted by PhosphoSitePlus database. Moreover, survival analysis of candidate genes and pathways was performed by Kaplan–Meier plotter. Finally, candidate genes were validated by immunohistochemistry in PDAC tissues. Results Compared with normal tissues, the total DEGs number for each PDAC stage were 994 (stage I), 967 (stage IIa), 965 (stage IIb), 1027 (stage III), 925 (stage IV), respectively. The stage-course gene expression analysis showed that 30 distinct expressional models were clustered. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis indicated that the up-regulated DEGs were commonly enriched in five fundamental pathways throughout five stages, including pathways in cancer, small cell lung cancer, ECM-receptor interaction, amoebiasis, focal adhesion. Except for amoebiasis, these pathways were associated with poor PDAC overall survival. Meanwhile, LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2, COL4A1 and FN1 were commonly shared by these five pathways and were unfavorable factors for prognosis. Furthermore, by constructing the stage-course dynamic protein interaction network, 45 functional molecular modules and 19 nodes were identified as featured regulators for all PDAC stages, among which the collagen family and integrins were considered as two main regulators for facilitating aggressive progression. Additionally, the clinical relevance analysis suggested that the stage IV featured nodes MLF1IP and ITGB4 were significantly correlated with shorter overall survival. Moreover, 15 stage-specific protein kinases were identified from the dynamic network and CHEK1 was particularly activated at stage IV. Experimental validation showed that MLF1IP, LAMA3 and LAMB3 were progressively increased from tumor initiation to progression. Conclusions Our study provided a view for a better understanding of the dynamic landscape of molecular interaction networks during PDAC progression and offered potential targets for therapeutic intervention.
topic Dynamic molecular networks
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Progression
Bioinformatics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12935-018-0718-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zongfupan analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
AT luli analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
AT qilufang analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
AT yiwenzhang analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
AT xiaopinghu analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
AT yangyangqian analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
AT pinghuang analysisofdynamicmolecularnetworksforpancreaticductaladenocarcinomaprogression
_version_ 1724865593351340032