Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review

Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an incr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fábio Carderelli Minozzo, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2013-01-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000200023
id doaj-c67401d6ee0a4297abecfec42f8b199b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c67401d6ee0a4297abecfec42f8b199b2020-11-25T00:13:50ZengFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics1807-59321980-53222013-01-01682269274Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief reviewFábio Carderelli MinozzoClaudio Andre Barbosa de LiraMuscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000200023Force EnhancementStretchMuscleFibersMyofibrils
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fábio Carderelli Minozzo
Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira
spellingShingle Fábio Carderelli Minozzo
Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
Clinics
Force Enhancement
Stretch
Muscle
Fibers
Myofibrils
author_facet Fábio Carderelli Minozzo
Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira
author_sort Fábio Carderelli Minozzo
title Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_short Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_full Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_fullStr Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_full_unstemmed Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
title_sort muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
series Clinics
issn 1807-5932
1980-5322
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist.
topic Force Enhancement
Stretch
Muscle
Fibers
Myofibrils
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000200023
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiocarderelliminozzo muscleresidualforceenhancementabriefreview
AT claudioandrebarbosadelira muscleresidualforceenhancementabriefreview
_version_ 1725393033400156160