Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review
Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an incr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Clinics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000200023 |
id |
doaj-c67401d6ee0a4297abecfec42f8b199b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c67401d6ee0a4297abecfec42f8b199b2020-11-25T00:13:50ZengFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics1807-59321980-53222013-01-01682269274Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief reviewFábio Carderelli MinozzoClaudio Andre Barbosa de LiraMuscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000200023Force EnhancementStretchMuscleFibersMyofibrils |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fábio Carderelli Minozzo Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira |
spellingShingle |
Fábio Carderelli Minozzo Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review Clinics Force Enhancement Stretch Muscle Fibers Myofibrils |
author_facet |
Fábio Carderelli Minozzo Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira |
author_sort |
Fábio Carderelli Minozzo |
title |
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_short |
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_full |
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_fullStr |
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
title_sort |
muscle residual force enhancement: a brief review |
publisher |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
series |
Clinics |
issn |
1807-5932 1980-5322 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Muscle residual force enhancement has been observed in different muscle preparations for more than half a century. Nonetheless, its mechanism remains unclear; to date, there are three generally accepted hypotheses: 1) sarcomere length non-uniformity, 2) engagement of passive elements, and 3) an increased number of cross-bridges. The first hypothesis uses sarcomere non-homogeneity and instability to explain how "weak" sarcomeres would convey the higher tension generated by an enhanced overlap from "stronger" sarcomeres, allowing the whole system to produce higher forces than predicted by the force-length relationship; non-uniformity provides theoretical support for a large amount of the experimental data. The second hypothesis suggests that passive elements within the sarcomeres (i.e., titin) could gain strain upon calcium activation followed by stretch. Finally, the third hypothesis suggests that muscle stretch after activation would alter cross-bridge kinetics to increase the number of attached cross-bridges. Presently, we cannot completely rule out any of the three hypotheses. Different experimental results suggest that the mechanisms on which these three hypotheses are based could all coexist. |
topic |
Force Enhancement Stretch Muscle Fibers Myofibrils |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000200023 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fabiocarderelliminozzo muscleresidualforceenhancementabriefreview AT claudioandrebarbosadelira muscleresidualforceenhancementabriefreview |
_version_ |
1725393033400156160 |