Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?

Successful discontinuation of cabergoline (CAB) treatment has been reported in 31 to 74% of prolactinomas patients treated for at least two years. In contrast, it is not well established whether CAB therapy can be successfully withdrawn after a failed first attempt. This prospective open trial was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucio eVilar, José Luciano eAlbuquerque, Patricia Sampaio Gadelha, Frederico eRangel Filho, Aline Maria C. Siqueira, Maíra Melo Fonseca, Karoline Frazão Viana, Barbara Sales Gomes, Ruy eLyra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2015.00011/full
id doaj-c6b8b0cfa19b4b40a412ed5651220674
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6b8b0cfa19b4b40a412ed56512206742020-11-25T00:10:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922015-02-01610.3389/fendo.2015.00011127792Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?Lucio eVilar0José Luciano eAlbuquerque1Patricia Sampaio Gadelha2Frederico eRangel Filho3Aline Maria C. Siqueira4Maíra Melo Fonseca5Karoline Frazão Viana6Barbara Sales Gomes7Ruy eLyra8Division of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Endocrinology/Hospital das Clinicas/Federal University of PernambucoSuccessful discontinuation of cabergoline (CAB) treatment has been reported in 31 to 74% of prolactinomas patients treated for at least two years. In contrast, it is not well established whether CAB therapy can be successfully withdrawn after a failed first attempt. This prospective open trial was designed to address this topic and to try to identify possible predictor factors.Among 180 patients with prolactinomas on CAB therapy, the authors selected those who fulfilled very strict criteria, particularly additional CAB therapy for at least 2 years, normalization of serum prolactin (PRL) levels following CAB restart, no tumor remnant > 10 mm, no previous pituitary radiotherapy or surgery; and current CAB dose ≤1.0 mg/week. Recurrence was defined as an increase of PRL levels above the upper limit of normal.A total of 34 patients (70.6% female) treated with CAB for 24-30 months were recruited. Ten patients (29.4 %) remained without evidence of recurrence after 24–26 months of follow-up. Twenty-four patients (70.6%) recurred within 15 months (75% within 12 months) after drug withdrawal and ~80% were restarted CAB. Median time to recurrence was 10.5 months (range, 3–15). Despite overlapping values, non-recurring patients had significantly lower mean PRL levels before withdrawal. Moreover, the recurrence rate was lower in subjects without visible tumor on pituitary MRI than in those with small remnant tumor (60 vs. 79%), though the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.20). No other characteristic could be identified as a predictor of successful CAB discontinuation.In conclusion, a second attempt of CAB withdrawal after 2 additional years of therapy may be successful, particularly in patients with lower PRL levels and no visible tumor on pituitary MRI. Close monitoring of PRL level is mandatory, especially within the first year after withdrawal, where most recurrences are detected.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2015.00011/fullDopamine AgonistsProlactinomaRecurrencecabergolinesecond withdrawal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucio eVilar
José Luciano eAlbuquerque
Patricia Sampaio Gadelha
Frederico eRangel Filho
Aline Maria C. Siqueira
Maíra Melo Fonseca
Karoline Frazão Viana
Barbara Sales Gomes
Ruy eLyra
spellingShingle Lucio eVilar
José Luciano eAlbuquerque
Patricia Sampaio Gadelha
Frederico eRangel Filho
Aline Maria C. Siqueira
Maíra Melo Fonseca
Karoline Frazão Viana
Barbara Sales Gomes
Ruy eLyra
Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Dopamine Agonists
Prolactinoma
Recurrence
cabergoline
second withdrawal
author_facet Lucio eVilar
José Luciano eAlbuquerque
Patricia Sampaio Gadelha
Frederico eRangel Filho
Aline Maria C. Siqueira
Maíra Melo Fonseca
Karoline Frazão Viana
Barbara Sales Gomes
Ruy eLyra
author_sort Lucio eVilar
title Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
title_short Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
title_full Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
title_fullStr Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
title_full_unstemmed Second attempt of Cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
title_sort second attempt of cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt : is it worthwhile?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
issn 1664-2392
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Successful discontinuation of cabergoline (CAB) treatment has been reported in 31 to 74% of prolactinomas patients treated for at least two years. In contrast, it is not well established whether CAB therapy can be successfully withdrawn after a failed first attempt. This prospective open trial was designed to address this topic and to try to identify possible predictor factors.Among 180 patients with prolactinomas on CAB therapy, the authors selected those who fulfilled very strict criteria, particularly additional CAB therapy for at least 2 years, normalization of serum prolactin (PRL) levels following CAB restart, no tumor remnant > 10 mm, no previous pituitary radiotherapy or surgery; and current CAB dose ≤1.0 mg/week. Recurrence was defined as an increase of PRL levels above the upper limit of normal.A total of 34 patients (70.6% female) treated with CAB for 24-30 months were recruited. Ten patients (29.4 %) remained without evidence of recurrence after 24–26 months of follow-up. Twenty-four patients (70.6%) recurred within 15 months (75% within 12 months) after drug withdrawal and ~80% were restarted CAB. Median time to recurrence was 10.5 months (range, 3–15). Despite overlapping values, non-recurring patients had significantly lower mean PRL levels before withdrawal. Moreover, the recurrence rate was lower in subjects without visible tumor on pituitary MRI than in those with small remnant tumor (60 vs. 79%), though the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.20). No other characteristic could be identified as a predictor of successful CAB discontinuation.In conclusion, a second attempt of CAB withdrawal after 2 additional years of therapy may be successful, particularly in patients with lower PRL levels and no visible tumor on pituitary MRI. Close monitoring of PRL level is mandatory, especially within the first year after withdrawal, where most recurrences are detected.
topic Dopamine Agonists
Prolactinoma
Recurrence
cabergoline
second withdrawal
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2015.00011/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucioevilar secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT joselucianoealbuquerque secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT patriciasampaiogadelha secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT fredericoerangelfilho secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT alinemariacsiqueira secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT mairamelofonseca secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT karolinefrazaoviana secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT barbarasalesgomes secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
AT ruyelyra secondattemptofcabergolinewithdrawalinpatientswithprolactinomasafterafailedfirstattemptisitworthwhile
_version_ 1725407168564297728