Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination

Abstract Information from different sensory modalities can interact, shaping what we think we have seen, heard, or otherwise perceived. Such interactions can enhance the precision of perceptual decisions, relative to those based on information from a single sensory modality. Several computational pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derek H. Arnold, Kirstie Petrie, Cailem Murray, Alan Johnston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2019-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37888-7
id doaj-c6e96bc883aa4dcca483f48993757a38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c6e96bc883aa4dcca483f48993757a382020-12-08T08:24:10ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222019-03-019111110.1038/s41598-018-37888-7Suboptimal human multisensory cue combinationDerek H. Arnold0Kirstie Petrie1Cailem Murray2Alan Johnston3School of Psychology, The University of QueenslandSchool of Psychology, The University of QueenslandSchool of Psychology, The University of QueenslandExperimental Psychology, University of NottinghamAbstract Information from different sensory modalities can interact, shaping what we think we have seen, heard, or otherwise perceived. Such interactions can enhance the precision of perceptual decisions, relative to those based on information from a single sensory modality. Several computational processes could account for such improvements. Slight improvements could arise if decisions are based on multiple independent sensory estimates, as opposed to just one. Still greater improvements could arise if initially independent estimates are summed to form a single integrated code. This hypothetical process has often been described as optimal when it results in bimodal performance consistent with a summation of unimodal estimates weighted in proportion to the precision of each initially independent sensory code. Here we examine cross-modal cue combination for audio-visual temporal rate and spatial location cues. While suggestive of a cross-modal encoding advantage, the degree of facilitation falls short of that predicted by a precision weighted summation process. These data accord with other published observations, and suggest that precision weighted combination is not a general property of human cross-modal perception.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37888-7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Derek H. Arnold
Kirstie Petrie
Cailem Murray
Alan Johnston
spellingShingle Derek H. Arnold
Kirstie Petrie
Cailem Murray
Alan Johnston
Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
Scientific Reports
author_facet Derek H. Arnold
Kirstie Petrie
Cailem Murray
Alan Johnston
author_sort Derek H. Arnold
title Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
title_short Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
title_full Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
title_fullStr Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
title_full_unstemmed Suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
title_sort suboptimal human multisensory cue combination
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Information from different sensory modalities can interact, shaping what we think we have seen, heard, or otherwise perceived. Such interactions can enhance the precision of perceptual decisions, relative to those based on information from a single sensory modality. Several computational processes could account for such improvements. Slight improvements could arise if decisions are based on multiple independent sensory estimates, as opposed to just one. Still greater improvements could arise if initially independent estimates are summed to form a single integrated code. This hypothetical process has often been described as optimal when it results in bimodal performance consistent with a summation of unimodal estimates weighted in proportion to the precision of each initially independent sensory code. Here we examine cross-modal cue combination for audio-visual temporal rate and spatial location cues. While suggestive of a cross-modal encoding advantage, the degree of facilitation falls short of that predicted by a precision weighted summation process. These data accord with other published observations, and suggest that precision weighted combination is not a general property of human cross-modal perception.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37888-7
work_keys_str_mv AT derekharnold suboptimalhumanmultisensorycuecombination
AT kirstiepetrie suboptimalhumanmultisensorycuecombination
AT cailemmurray suboptimalhumanmultisensorycuecombination
AT alanjohnston suboptimalhumanmultisensorycuecombination
_version_ 1724391105542225920