Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot

In this study, Fuzzy Logic (FL) and Interval Type-2 FL (IT-2FL) controllers were applied to a mobile robot in order to determine which method facilitates navigation and enables the robot to overcome real-world uncertainties and track an optimal trajectory in a very short time. The robot under consid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Kasmi, A. Hassam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: D. G. Pylarinos 2021-04-01
Series:Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/4031
id doaj-c742bcf1ce8f4a2e8136b72f3953b528
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c742bcf1ce8f4a2e8136b72f3953b5282021-04-12T14:12:20ZengD. G. PylarinosEngineering, Technology & Applied Science Research2241-44871792-80362021-04-0111210.48084/etasr.4031Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile RobotB. Kasmi0A. Hassam1Department of Electronics, Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, University Ferhat Abbas Setif 1, AlgeriaDepartment of Electronics, Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, University Ferhat Abbas Setif 1, AlgeriaIn this study, Fuzzy Logic (FL) and Interval Type-2 FL (IT-2FL) controllers were applied to a mobile robot in order to determine which method facilitates navigation and enables the robot to overcome real-world uncertainties and track an optimal trajectory in a very short time. The robot under consideration is a non-holonomic unicycle mobile robot, represented by a kinematic model, evolving in two different environments. The first environment is barrier-free, and moving the robot from an initial to a target position requires the introduction of a single action module. Subsequently, the same problem was approached in an environment closer to reality, with objects hindering the robot's movement. This case requires another controller, called obstacle avoidance. This system allows the robot to reach autonomously a well-defined target by avoiding collision with obstacles. The robustness of the structures of the defined controllers is tested in Matlab simulations of the studied controllers. The results show that the IT-2FL controller performs better than the FL controller. https://etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/4031Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic (IT2-FL)Fuzzy Logic (FL)mobile robotnon-holonomicobstacle avoidancetrajectory planning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Kasmi
A. Hassam
spellingShingle B. Kasmi
A. Hassam
Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic (IT2-FL)
Fuzzy Logic (FL)
mobile robot
non-holonomic
obstacle avoidance
trajectory planning
author_facet B. Kasmi
A. Hassam
author_sort B. Kasmi
title Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot
title_short Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot
title_full Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot
title_fullStr Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between Fuzzy Logic and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controllers for the Trajectory Planning of a Mobile Robot
title_sort comparative study between fuzzy logic and interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers for the trajectory planning of a mobile robot
publisher D. G. Pylarinos
series Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
issn 2241-4487
1792-8036
publishDate 2021-04-01
description In this study, Fuzzy Logic (FL) and Interval Type-2 FL (IT-2FL) controllers were applied to a mobile robot in order to determine which method facilitates navigation and enables the robot to overcome real-world uncertainties and track an optimal trajectory in a very short time. The robot under consideration is a non-holonomic unicycle mobile robot, represented by a kinematic model, evolving in two different environments. The first environment is barrier-free, and moving the robot from an initial to a target position requires the introduction of a single action module. Subsequently, the same problem was approached in an environment closer to reality, with objects hindering the robot's movement. This case requires another controller, called obstacle avoidance. This system allows the robot to reach autonomously a well-defined target by avoiding collision with obstacles. The robustness of the structures of the defined controllers is tested in Matlab simulations of the studied controllers. The results show that the IT-2FL controller performs better than the FL controller.
topic Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic (IT2-FL)
Fuzzy Logic (FL)
mobile robot
non-holonomic
obstacle avoidance
trajectory planning
url https://etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/4031
work_keys_str_mv AT bkasmi comparativestudybetweenfuzzylogicandintervaltype2fuzzylogiccontrollersforthetrajectoryplanningofamobilerobot
AT ahassam comparativestudybetweenfuzzylogicandintervaltype2fuzzylogiccontrollersforthetrajectoryplanningofamobilerobot
_version_ 1721529966246494208