Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction

gDNA (genomic DNA extraction from blood is a fundamental process in many diagnostic, identification and research applications. Numerous extraction methods have been reported and are available commercially. However, there is insufficient understanding of the impact of chemical buffers on DNA yield f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun‑Jie Poh, Samuel Ken‑En Gan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Portland Press, Biochemical Society 2014-10-01
Series:Bioscience Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bioscirep.org/bsr/034/e145/bsr034e145.htm
id doaj-c751f3c61af54b70822ff5f1b53ecca7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c751f3c61af54b70822ff5f1b53ecca72020-11-24T22:01:03ZengPortland Press, Biochemical SocietyBioscience Reports1573-49352014-10-01345e0014510.1042/BSR20140105BSR20140105Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extractionJun‑Jie Poh0Samuel Ken‑En Gan Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (ASTAR), Singapore 138671, Singapore gDNA (genomic DNA extraction from blood is a fundamental process in many diagnostic, identification and research applications. Numerous extraction methods have been reported and are available commercially. However, there is insufficient understanding of the impact of chemical buffers on DNA yield from either whole or nucleated blood. Moreover, these commercial kits are often costly, constraining less well-funded laboratories to traditional and more cost-effective salt-precipitation methods. Towards this, we compared a salt-precipitation and a customized cost-effective spin-column-based method, studying the impact of different chemical constituents on the yields. This customized method resulted in a shortening of the extraction process, higher gDNA yields, and more successful PCR amplification of gDNA genes compared with the salt-precipitation method. Optimizing different chemical buffers on whole- and nucleated blood materials further revealed that certain chemicals boosted extractions from whole- but not nucleated blood. These findings may be useful to laboratories that do not have ready access to commercial kits, and improve their nucleic acid extractions from blood economically.http://www.bioscirep.org/bsr/034/e145/bsr034e145.htmcolumn-based purificationsgDNA extractionnucleated bloodPCR; salt-precipitationwhole blood
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun‑Jie Poh
Samuel Ken‑En Gan
spellingShingle Jun‑Jie Poh
Samuel Ken‑En Gan
Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction
Bioscience Reports
column-based purifications
gDNA extraction
nucleated blood
PCR; salt-precipitation
whole blood
author_facet Jun‑Jie Poh
Samuel Ken‑En Gan
author_sort Jun‑Jie Poh
title Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction
title_short Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction
title_full Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction
title_fullStr Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood DNA extraction
title_sort comparison of customized spin-column and salt-precipitation finger-prick blood dna extraction
publisher Portland Press, Biochemical Society
series Bioscience Reports
issn 1573-4935
publishDate 2014-10-01
description gDNA (genomic DNA extraction from blood is a fundamental process in many diagnostic, identification and research applications. Numerous extraction methods have been reported and are available commercially. However, there is insufficient understanding of the impact of chemical buffers on DNA yield from either whole or nucleated blood. Moreover, these commercial kits are often costly, constraining less well-funded laboratories to traditional and more cost-effective salt-precipitation methods. Towards this, we compared a salt-precipitation and a customized cost-effective spin-column-based method, studying the impact of different chemical constituents on the yields. This customized method resulted in a shortening of the extraction process, higher gDNA yields, and more successful PCR amplification of gDNA genes compared with the salt-precipitation method. Optimizing different chemical buffers on whole- and nucleated blood materials further revealed that certain chemicals boosted extractions from whole- but not nucleated blood. These findings may be useful to laboratories that do not have ready access to commercial kits, and improve their nucleic acid extractions from blood economically.
topic column-based purifications
gDNA extraction
nucleated blood
PCR; salt-precipitation
whole blood
url http://www.bioscirep.org/bsr/034/e145/bsr034e145.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT junjiepoh comparisonofcustomizedspincolumnandsaltprecipitationfingerprickblooddnaextraction
AT samuelkenengan comparisonofcustomizedspincolumnandsaltprecipitationfingerprickblooddnaextraction
_version_ 1725841926074138624