Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction

In this study, the seismic behavior of low-rise self-centering (SC) prestressed concrete frames considering soil-structure interaction (SSI) is presented. For this purpose, a typical 4-story SC concrete frame, with and without flexible foundations, is analyzed through nonlinear dynamic analysis. Gro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liang-Long Song, Tong Guo, Xin Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2586452
id doaj-c75c07e3e6b74f7aa24aa97a12fb28dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c75c07e3e6b74f7aa24aa97a12fb28dc2020-11-24T23:51:06ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032019-01-01201910.1155/2019/25864522586452Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure InteractionLiang-Long Song0Tong Guo1Xin Shi2College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, ChinaIn this study, the seismic behavior of low-rise self-centering (SC) prestressed concrete frames considering soil-structure interaction (SSI) is presented. For this purpose, a typical 4-story SC concrete frame, with and without flexible foundations, is analyzed through nonlinear dynamic analysis. Ground motion sets with two hazard levels are selected for analysis. A conventional reinforced concrete (RC) frame is also studied, and the structural demands of the RC and SC frames are compared in terms of peak and residual drifts, base shear, residual settlement, and rotation of foundation. The analysis results show that considering soil-structure interaction generally increases the peak and residual drift demands and reduces the base shear and connection rotation demands when compared to fixed base conditions. For the cases with and without flexible foundations, the SC frame is found to have comparable peak story drifts with the RC frame and have the inherent potential of significantly reducing the residual drifts. The seismic analysis results of the frames with flexible bases show that the RC and SC frames can experience foundation damage due to excessive residual foundation rotations after the maximum considered earthquake (MCE).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2586452
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liang-Long Song
Tong Guo
Xin Shi
spellingShingle Liang-Long Song
Tong Guo
Xin Shi
Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
Shock and Vibration
author_facet Liang-Long Song
Tong Guo
Xin Shi
author_sort Liang-Long Song
title Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
title_short Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
title_full Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
title_fullStr Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames considering Soil-Structure Interaction
title_sort seismic analysis of low-rise self-centering prestressed concrete frames considering soil-structure interaction
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Shock and Vibration
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this study, the seismic behavior of low-rise self-centering (SC) prestressed concrete frames considering soil-structure interaction (SSI) is presented. For this purpose, a typical 4-story SC concrete frame, with and without flexible foundations, is analyzed through nonlinear dynamic analysis. Ground motion sets with two hazard levels are selected for analysis. A conventional reinforced concrete (RC) frame is also studied, and the structural demands of the RC and SC frames are compared in terms of peak and residual drifts, base shear, residual settlement, and rotation of foundation. The analysis results show that considering soil-structure interaction generally increases the peak and residual drift demands and reduces the base shear and connection rotation demands when compared to fixed base conditions. For the cases with and without flexible foundations, the SC frame is found to have comparable peak story drifts with the RC frame and have the inherent potential of significantly reducing the residual drifts. The seismic analysis results of the frames with flexible bases show that the RC and SC frames can experience foundation damage due to excessive residual foundation rotations after the maximum considered earthquake (MCE).
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2586452
work_keys_str_mv AT lianglongsong seismicanalysisoflowriseselfcenteringprestressedconcreteframesconsideringsoilstructureinteraction
AT tongguo seismicanalysisoflowriseselfcenteringprestressedconcreteframesconsideringsoilstructureinteraction
AT xinshi seismicanalysisoflowriseselfcenteringprestressedconcreteframesconsideringsoilstructureinteraction
_version_ 1725477455414689792