Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.

PURPOSE:Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS:In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyeck Soo Son, Grzegorz Labuz, Ramin Khoramnia, Patrick Merz, Timur M Yildirim, Gerd U Auffarth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228342
id doaj-c75eadacef824108a035167e164175c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c75eadacef824108a035167e164175c72021-03-03T21:48:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022834210.1371/journal.pone.0228342Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.Hyeck Soo SonGrzegorz LabuzRamin KhoramniaPatrick MerzTimur M YildirimGerd U AuffarthPURPOSE:Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS:In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6AD1 [Alcon], a diffractive trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 [Alcon], and a diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) Symfony ZXR00 [Johnson&Johnson]. An experimental set-up with a water bath containing 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic green laser light (532 nm) was used to visualize the propagation of light rays. Also, the optical performance of the IOLs was evaluated by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at a pupil sizes of 3.0 and 4.5 mm on the optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II (Trioptics GmbH, Germany). RESULTS:Both the diffractive-refractive bifocal IOL and the EDOF IOL showed two defined foci for distance and near vision. In the diffractive trifocal IOL, three distinct foci for distance, intermediate, and near vision could be visualized. CONCLUSIONS:The ray propagation visualization technique allows a qualitative assessment and comparison of light energy distribution between different IOL models. The measured Through-Focus Response (TFR) quantitatively confirmed the evaluated ray propagation behavior.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228342
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hyeck Soo Son
Grzegorz Labuz
Ramin Khoramnia
Patrick Merz
Timur M Yildirim
Gerd U Auffarth
spellingShingle Hyeck Soo Son
Grzegorz Labuz
Ramin Khoramnia
Patrick Merz
Timur M Yildirim
Gerd U Auffarth
Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hyeck Soo Son
Grzegorz Labuz
Ramin Khoramnia
Patrick Merz
Timur M Yildirim
Gerd U Auffarth
author_sort Hyeck Soo Son
title Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
title_short Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
title_full Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
title_fullStr Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
title_full_unstemmed Ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
title_sort ray propagation imaging and optical quality evaluation of different intraocular lens models.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description PURPOSE:Ray propagation visualization and optical performance analysis of four different intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS:In this laboratory study, four IOLs with different optical designs were assessed: a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF [Alcon], a diffractive-refractive bifocal AcrySof IQ Restor SN6AD1 [Alcon], a diffractive trifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 [Alcon], and a diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) Symfony ZXR00 [Johnson&Johnson]. An experimental set-up with a water bath containing 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic green laser light (532 nm) was used to visualize the propagation of light rays. Also, the optical performance of the IOLs was evaluated by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at a pupil sizes of 3.0 and 4.5 mm on the optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II (Trioptics GmbH, Germany). RESULTS:Both the diffractive-refractive bifocal IOL and the EDOF IOL showed two defined foci for distance and near vision. In the diffractive trifocal IOL, three distinct foci for distance, intermediate, and near vision could be visualized. CONCLUSIONS:The ray propagation visualization technique allows a qualitative assessment and comparison of light energy distribution between different IOL models. The measured Through-Focus Response (TFR) quantitatively confirmed the evaluated ray propagation behavior.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228342
work_keys_str_mv AT hyecksooson raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT grzegorzlabuz raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT raminkhoramnia raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT patrickmerz raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT timurmyildirim raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
AT gerduauffarth raypropagationimagingandopticalqualityevaluationofdifferentintraocularlensmodels
_version_ 1714815080238940160