Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Aim. To compare clinical effectiveness and safety of bisoprolol and metoprolol as a part of basis chronic heart failure (CHF) therapy in patients with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Material and methods. The study included 60 patients at Day 25-30 after myocardial infarction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. E. Statsenko, D. A. Ivanova, O. E. Sporova, S. V. Belenkova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2008-12-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1729
id doaj-c76e47d043484912b0f8b4d598ac5b00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c76e47d043484912b0f8b4d598ac5b002021-07-28T13:50:48Zrus«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLCКардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика1728-88002619-01252008-12-017858631447Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseM. E. Statsenko0D. A. Ivanova1O. E. Sporova2S. V. Belenkova3Volgograd State Medical University, City Clinical Hospital № 3. VolgogradVolgograd State Medical University, City Clinical Hospital № 3. VolgogradVolgograd State Medical University, City Clinical Hospital № 3. VolgogradVolgograd State Medical University, City Clinical Hospital № 3. VolgogradAim. To compare clinical effectiveness and safety of bisoprolol and metoprolol as a part of basis chronic heart failure (CHF) therapy in patients with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Material and methods. The study included 60 patients at Day 25-30 after myocardial infarction, complicated by functional Class (FC) II-III CHF. All participants suffered from moderate to severe COPD. All patients underwent clinical examination, CHF FC assessment, echocardiography, 24-hour electrocardiography monitoring, renal function, lung function (LF), and quality of life assessment. The participants were randomised into two groups: group I (n=30) received bisoprolol, and Group II (n=300) - metoprolol tartrate as a part of basis CHF therapy.Results. Comparing to metoprolol, bisoprolol more effectively increased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, decreased diastolic dysfunction severity, and reduced LV remodelling, did not affect LF and did not increase airway resistance.Conclusion. Comparing to metoprolol tartrate, bisoprolol was more effective and safe in patients with CHF and Stage II-III COPD.https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1729chronic heart failurechronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseheart morphology and functionrenal functionlung functionquality of life
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. E. Statsenko
D. A. Ivanova
O. E. Sporova
S. V. Belenkova
spellingShingle M. E. Statsenko
D. A. Ivanova
O. E. Sporova
S. V. Belenkova
Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
chronic heart failure
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
heart morphology and function
renal function
lung function
quality of life
author_facet M. E. Statsenko
D. A. Ivanova
O. E. Sporova
S. V. Belenkova
author_sort M. E. Statsenko
title Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_short Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_fullStr Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full_unstemmed Beta-adrenoЬlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_sort beta-adrenoьlockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
publisher «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC
series Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
issn 1728-8800
2619-0125
publishDate 2008-12-01
description Aim. To compare clinical effectiveness and safety of bisoprolol and metoprolol as a part of basis chronic heart failure (CHF) therapy in patients with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Material and methods. The study included 60 patients at Day 25-30 after myocardial infarction, complicated by functional Class (FC) II-III CHF. All participants suffered from moderate to severe COPD. All patients underwent clinical examination, CHF FC assessment, echocardiography, 24-hour electrocardiography monitoring, renal function, lung function (LF), and quality of life assessment. The participants were randomised into two groups: group I (n=30) received bisoprolol, and Group II (n=300) - metoprolol tartrate as a part of basis CHF therapy.Results. Comparing to metoprolol, bisoprolol more effectively increased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, decreased diastolic dysfunction severity, and reduced LV remodelling, did not affect LF and did not increase airway resistance.Conclusion. Comparing to metoprolol tartrate, bisoprolol was more effective and safe in patients with CHF and Stage II-III COPD.
topic chronic heart failure
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
heart morphology and function
renal function
lung function
quality of life
url https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1729
work_keys_str_mv AT mestatsenko betaadrenoʹlockersinpatientswithchronicheartfailureandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT daivanova betaadrenoʹlockersinpatientswithchronicheartfailureandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT oesporova betaadrenoʹlockersinpatientswithchronicheartfailureandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT svbelenkova betaadrenoʹlockersinpatientswithchronicheartfailureandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
_version_ 1721271284259618816