Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different <it>Ehrlichia </it>spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-02-01
|
Series: | Parasites & Vectors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/29 |
id |
doaj-c7707793f01a47a4bead98581846d70f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c7707793f01a47a4bead98581846d70f2020-11-25T00:21:31ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052012-02-01512910.1186/1756-3305-5-29Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North AmericaBeall Melissa JAlleman A RickBreitschwerdt Ed BCohn Leah ACouto C GuillermoDryden Michael WGuptill Lynn CIazbik CristinaKania Stephen ALathan PattyLittle Susan ERoy AlmaSayler Katherine AStillman Brett AWelles Elizabeth GWolfson WendyYabsley Michael J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different <it>Ehrlichia </it>spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Dog blood samples (n = 8,662) were submitted from 14 veterinary colleges, 6 private veterinary practices and 4 diagnostic laboratories across this region. Samples were tested for <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>specific antibodies using peptide microtiter ELISAs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall, <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seroprevalence was 0.8%, 2.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The highest <it>E. canis </it>seroprevalence (2.3%) was found in a region encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity was 6.6% in the central region (Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma) and 4.6% in the southeast region (Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia). Seroreactivity to <it>E. ewingii </it>was also highest in the central region (14.6%) followed by the southeast region (5.9%). The geospatial pattern derived from <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seropositive samples was similar to previous reports based on <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity in white-tailed deer and the distribution of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) cases reported by the CDC.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study provide the first large scale regional documentation of exposure to <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>in pet dogs, highlighting regional differences in seroprevalence and providing the basis for heightened awareness of these emerging vector-borne pathogens by veterinarians and public health agencies.</p> http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/29<it>Ehrlichia</it><it>E. canis</it><it>E. chaffeensis</it><it>E. ewingii</it>dogtickprevalence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Beall Melissa J Alleman A Rick Breitschwerdt Ed B Cohn Leah A Couto C Guillermo Dryden Michael W Guptill Lynn C Iazbik Cristina Kania Stephen A Lathan Patty Little Susan E Roy Alma Sayler Katherine A Stillman Brett A Welles Elizabeth G Wolfson Wendy Yabsley Michael J |
spellingShingle |
Beall Melissa J Alleman A Rick Breitschwerdt Ed B Cohn Leah A Couto C Guillermo Dryden Michael W Guptill Lynn C Iazbik Cristina Kania Stephen A Lathan Patty Little Susan E Roy Alma Sayler Katherine A Stillman Brett A Welles Elizabeth G Wolfson Wendy Yabsley Michael J Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America Parasites & Vectors <it>Ehrlichia</it> <it>E. canis</it> <it>E. chaffeensis</it> <it>E. ewingii</it> dog tick prevalence |
author_facet |
Beall Melissa J Alleman A Rick Breitschwerdt Ed B Cohn Leah A Couto C Guillermo Dryden Michael W Guptill Lynn C Iazbik Cristina Kania Stephen A Lathan Patty Little Susan E Roy Alma Sayler Katherine A Stillman Brett A Welles Elizabeth G Wolfson Wendy Yabsley Michael J |
author_sort |
Beall Melissa J |
title |
Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America |
title_short |
Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America |
title_full |
Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America |
title_fullStr |
Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America |
title_sort |
seroprevalence of <it>ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in north america |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Parasites & Vectors |
issn |
1756-3305 |
publishDate |
2012-02-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different <it>Ehrlichia </it>spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Dog blood samples (n = 8,662) were submitted from 14 veterinary colleges, 6 private veterinary practices and 4 diagnostic laboratories across this region. Samples were tested for <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>specific antibodies using peptide microtiter ELISAs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall, <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seroprevalence was 0.8%, 2.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The highest <it>E. canis </it>seroprevalence (2.3%) was found in a region encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity was 6.6% in the central region (Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma) and 4.6% in the southeast region (Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia). Seroreactivity to <it>E. ewingii </it>was also highest in the central region (14.6%) followed by the southeast region (5.9%). The geospatial pattern derived from <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seropositive samples was similar to previous reports based on <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity in white-tailed deer and the distribution of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) cases reported by the CDC.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study provide the first large scale regional documentation of exposure to <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>in pet dogs, highlighting regional differences in seroprevalence and providing the basis for heightened awareness of these emerging vector-borne pathogens by veterinarians and public health agencies.</p> |
topic |
<it>Ehrlichia</it> <it>E. canis</it> <it>E. chaffeensis</it> <it>E. ewingii</it> dog tick prevalence |
url |
http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/29 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT beallmelissaj seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT allemanarick seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT breitschwerdtedb seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT cohnleaha seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT coutocguillermo seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT drydenmichaelw seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT guptilllynnc seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT iazbikcristina seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT kaniastephena seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT lathanpatty seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT littlesusane seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT royalma seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT saylerkatherinea seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT stillmanbretta seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT welleselizabethg seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT wolfsonwendy seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica AT yabsleymichaelj seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica |
_version_ |
1725362370394456064 |