Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different <it>Ehrlichia </it>spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beall Melissa J, Alleman A Rick, Breitschwerdt Ed B, Cohn Leah A, Couto C Guillermo, Dryden Michael W, Guptill Lynn C, Iazbik Cristina, Kania Stephen A, Lathan Patty, Little Susan E, Roy Alma, Sayler Katherine A, Stillman Brett A, Welles Elizabeth G, Wolfson Wendy, Yabsley Michael J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-02-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
dog
Online Access:http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/29
id doaj-c7707793f01a47a4bead98581846d70f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7707793f01a47a4bead98581846d70f2020-11-25T00:21:31ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052012-02-01512910.1186/1756-3305-5-29Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North AmericaBeall Melissa JAlleman A RickBreitschwerdt Ed BCohn Leah ACouto C GuillermoDryden Michael WGuptill Lynn CIazbik CristinaKania Stephen ALathan PattyLittle Susan ERoy AlmaSayler Katherine AStillman Brett AWelles Elizabeth GWolfson WendyYabsley Michael J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different <it>Ehrlichia </it>spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Dog blood samples (n = 8,662) were submitted from 14 veterinary colleges, 6 private veterinary practices and 4 diagnostic laboratories across this region. Samples were tested for <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>specific antibodies using peptide microtiter ELISAs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall, <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seroprevalence was 0.8%, 2.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The highest <it>E. canis </it>seroprevalence (2.3%) was found in a region encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity was 6.6% in the central region (Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma) and 4.6% in the southeast region (Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia). Seroreactivity to <it>E. ewingii </it>was also highest in the central region (14.6%) followed by the southeast region (5.9%). The geospatial pattern derived from <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seropositive samples was similar to previous reports based on <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity in white-tailed deer and the distribution of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) cases reported by the CDC.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study provide the first large scale regional documentation of exposure to <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>in pet dogs, highlighting regional differences in seroprevalence and providing the basis for heightened awareness of these emerging vector-borne pathogens by veterinarians and public health agencies.</p> http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/29<it>Ehrlichia</it><it>E. canis</it><it>E. chaffeensis</it><it>E. ewingii</it>dogtickprevalence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beall Melissa J
Alleman A Rick
Breitschwerdt Ed B
Cohn Leah A
Couto C Guillermo
Dryden Michael W
Guptill Lynn C
Iazbik Cristina
Kania Stephen A
Lathan Patty
Little Susan E
Roy Alma
Sayler Katherine A
Stillman Brett A
Welles Elizabeth G
Wolfson Wendy
Yabsley Michael J
spellingShingle Beall Melissa J
Alleman A Rick
Breitschwerdt Ed B
Cohn Leah A
Couto C Guillermo
Dryden Michael W
Guptill Lynn C
Iazbik Cristina
Kania Stephen A
Lathan Patty
Little Susan E
Roy Alma
Sayler Katherine A
Stillman Brett A
Welles Elizabeth G
Wolfson Wendy
Yabsley Michael J
Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
Parasites & Vectors
<it>Ehrlichia</it>
<it>E. canis</it>
<it>E. chaffeensis</it>
<it>E. ewingii</it>
dog
tick
prevalence
author_facet Beall Melissa J
Alleman A Rick
Breitschwerdt Ed B
Cohn Leah A
Couto C Guillermo
Dryden Michael W
Guptill Lynn C
Iazbik Cristina
Kania Stephen A
Lathan Patty
Little Susan E
Roy Alma
Sayler Katherine A
Stillman Brett A
Welles Elizabeth G
Wolfson Wendy
Yabsley Michael J
author_sort Beall Melissa J
title Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
title_short Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
title_full Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
title_fullStr Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence of <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>Ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in North America
title_sort seroprevalence of <it>ehrlichia canis</it>, <it>ehrlichia chaffeensis </it>and <it>ehrlichia ewingii </it>in dogs in north america
publisher BMC
series Parasites & Vectors
issn 1756-3305
publishDate 2012-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluated the exposure of dogs to three different <it>Ehrlichia </it>spp. in the south and central regions of the United States where vector-borne disease prevalence has been previously difficult to ascertain, particularly beyond the metropolitan areas.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Dog blood samples (n = 8,662) were submitted from 14 veterinary colleges, 6 private veterinary practices and 4 diagnostic laboratories across this region. Samples were tested for <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>specific antibodies using peptide microtiter ELISAs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall, <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seroprevalence was 0.8%, 2.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The highest <it>E. canis </it>seroprevalence (2.3%) was found in a region encompassing Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity was 6.6% in the central region (Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma) and 4.6% in the southeast region (Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia). Seroreactivity to <it>E. ewingii </it>was also highest in the central region (14.6%) followed by the southeast region (5.9%). The geospatial pattern derived from <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>seropositive samples was similar to previous reports based on <it>E. chaffeensis </it>seroreactivity in white-tailed deer and the distribution of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) cases reported by the CDC.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study provide the first large scale regional documentation of exposure to <it>E. canis</it>, <it>E. chaffeensis </it>and <it>E. ewingii </it>in pet dogs, highlighting regional differences in seroprevalence and providing the basis for heightened awareness of these emerging vector-borne pathogens by veterinarians and public health agencies.</p>
topic <it>Ehrlichia</it>
<it>E. canis</it>
<it>E. chaffeensis</it>
<it>E. ewingii</it>
dog
tick
prevalence
url http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/29
work_keys_str_mv AT beallmelissaj seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT allemanarick seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT breitschwerdtedb seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT cohnleaha seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT coutocguillermo seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT drydenmichaelw seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT guptilllynnc seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT iazbikcristina seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT kaniastephena seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT lathanpatty seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT littlesusane seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT royalma seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT saylerkatherinea seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT stillmanbretta seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT welleselizabethg seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT wolfsonwendy seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
AT yabsleymichaelj seroprevalenceofitehrlichiacanisititehrlichiachaffeensisitanditehrlichiaewingiiitindogsinnorthamerica
_version_ 1725362370394456064