Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
Background: Prehabilitation to maximize exercise capacity before lung cancer surgery has the potential to improve operative tolerability and patient outcomes. However, translation of this evidence into clinical practice is limited. Aims: To determine the acceptability and perceived benefit of prehab...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Integrative Cancer Therapies |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420924466 |
id |
doaj-c7a09ca7571a4e07a69dd58cc6dc53e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c7a09ca7571a4e07a69dd58cc6dc53e32020-11-25T03:36:04ZengSAGE PublishingIntegrative Cancer Therapies1534-73541552-695X2020-05-011910.1177/1534735420924466Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung CancerAnna Shukla BAppSc0Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD1Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD2Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD3Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD4St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaBackground: Prehabilitation to maximize exercise capacity before lung cancer surgery has the potential to improve operative tolerability and patient outcomes. However, translation of this evidence into clinical practice is limited. Aims: To determine the acceptability and perceived benefit of prehabilitation in lung cancer among thoracic surgeons. Procedure: 198 cardiothoracic surgeons within Australia and New Zealand were surveyed to evaluate their attitudes and perceived benefits of prehabilitation in lung cancer. Results: Response rate was 14%. A moderate proportion of respondents reported that there is a need to refer lung resection patients to preoperative physiotherapy/prehabilitation, particularly high-risk patients or those with borderline fitness for surgery. 91% of surgeons were willing to delay surgery (as indicated by cancer stage/type) to optimize patients via prehabilitation. The main barriers to prehabilitation reported were patient comorbidities and access to allied health professionals, with 33% stating that they were unsure who to refer to for prehabilitation in thoracic surgery. This is despite 60% of the cohort reporting that pulmonary rehabilitation is available as a preoperative resource. 92% of respondents believe that further research into prehabilitation in lung cancer is warranted. Conclusion: The benefits of prehabilitation for the oncology population have been well documented in the literature over recent years and this is reflected in the perceptions surgeons had on the benefits of prehabilitation for their patients. This survey demonstrates an interest among cardiothoracic surgeons in favor of prehabilitation, and therefore further research and demonstration of its benefit is needed in lung cancer to facilitate implementation into practice.https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420924466 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Shukla BAppSc Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD |
spellingShingle |
Anna Shukla BAppSc Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer Integrative Cancer Therapies |
author_facet |
Anna Shukla BAppSc Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD |
author_sort |
Anna Shukla BAppSc |
title |
Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer |
title_short |
Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer |
title_full |
Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer |
title_fullStr |
Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer |
title_sort |
attitudes and perceptions to prehabilitation in lung cancer |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Integrative Cancer Therapies |
issn |
1534-7354 1552-695X |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Background: Prehabilitation to maximize exercise capacity before lung cancer surgery has the potential to improve operative tolerability and patient outcomes. However, translation of this evidence into clinical practice is limited. Aims: To determine the acceptability and perceived benefit of prehabilitation in lung cancer among thoracic surgeons. Procedure: 198 cardiothoracic surgeons within Australia and New Zealand were surveyed to evaluate their attitudes and perceived benefits of prehabilitation in lung cancer. Results: Response rate was 14%. A moderate proportion of respondents reported that there is a need to refer lung resection patients to preoperative physiotherapy/prehabilitation, particularly high-risk patients or those with borderline fitness for surgery. 91% of surgeons were willing to delay surgery (as indicated by cancer stage/type) to optimize patients via prehabilitation. The main barriers to prehabilitation reported were patient comorbidities and access to allied health professionals, with 33% stating that they were unsure who to refer to for prehabilitation in thoracic surgery. This is despite 60% of the cohort reporting that pulmonary rehabilitation is available as a preoperative resource. 92% of respondents believe that further research into prehabilitation in lung cancer is warranted. Conclusion: The benefits of prehabilitation for the oncology population have been well documented in the literature over recent years and this is reflected in the perceptions surgeons had on the benefits of prehabilitation for their patients. This survey demonstrates an interest among cardiothoracic surgeons in favor of prehabilitation, and therefore further research and demonstration of its benefit is needed in lung cancer to facilitate implementation into practice. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420924466 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annashuklabappsc attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer AT catherinelgrangerbphysiohonsphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer AT gavinmwrightmbbsfracsphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer AT laraedbrookebappscphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer AT lindadenehybappscphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer |
_version_ |
1724551416946622464 |