Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer

Background: Prehabilitation to maximize exercise capacity before lung cancer surgery has the potential to improve operative tolerability and patient outcomes. However, translation of this evidence into clinical practice is limited. Aims: To determine the acceptability and perceived benefit of prehab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Shukla BAppSc, Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD, Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD, Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD, Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-05-01
Series:Integrative Cancer Therapies
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420924466
id doaj-c7a09ca7571a4e07a69dd58cc6dc53e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7a09ca7571a4e07a69dd58cc6dc53e32020-11-25T03:36:04ZengSAGE PublishingIntegrative Cancer Therapies1534-73541552-695X2020-05-011910.1177/1534735420924466Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung CancerAnna Shukla BAppSc0Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD1Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD2Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD3Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD4St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaBackground: Prehabilitation to maximize exercise capacity before lung cancer surgery has the potential to improve operative tolerability and patient outcomes. However, translation of this evidence into clinical practice is limited. Aims: To determine the acceptability and perceived benefit of prehabilitation in lung cancer among thoracic surgeons. Procedure: 198 cardiothoracic surgeons within Australia and New Zealand were surveyed to evaluate their attitudes and perceived benefits of prehabilitation in lung cancer. Results: Response rate was 14%. A moderate proportion of respondents reported that there is a need to refer lung resection patients to preoperative physiotherapy/prehabilitation, particularly high-risk patients or those with borderline fitness for surgery. 91% of surgeons were willing to delay surgery (as indicated by cancer stage/type) to optimize patients via prehabilitation. The main barriers to prehabilitation reported were patient comorbidities and access to allied health professionals, with 33% stating that they were unsure who to refer to for prehabilitation in thoracic surgery. This is despite 60% of the cohort reporting that pulmonary rehabilitation is available as a preoperative resource. 92% of respondents believe that further research into prehabilitation in lung cancer is warranted. Conclusion: The benefits of prehabilitation for the oncology population have been well documented in the literature over recent years and this is reflected in the perceptions surgeons had on the benefits of prehabilitation for their patients. This survey demonstrates an interest among cardiothoracic surgeons in favor of prehabilitation, and therefore further research and demonstration of its benefit is needed in lung cancer to facilitate implementation into practice.https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420924466
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Shukla BAppSc
Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD
Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD
Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD
Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD
spellingShingle Anna Shukla BAppSc
Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD
Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD
Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD
Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD
Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
Integrative Cancer Therapies
author_facet Anna Shukla BAppSc
Catherine L. Granger B Physio(Hons), PhD
Gavin M. Wright MBBS, FRACS, PhD
Lara Edbrooke BAppSc, PhD
Linda Denehy BAppSc, PhD
author_sort Anna Shukla BAppSc
title Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
title_short Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
title_full Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes and Perceptions to Prehabilitation in Lung Cancer
title_sort attitudes and perceptions to prehabilitation in lung cancer
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Integrative Cancer Therapies
issn 1534-7354
1552-695X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background: Prehabilitation to maximize exercise capacity before lung cancer surgery has the potential to improve operative tolerability and patient outcomes. However, translation of this evidence into clinical practice is limited. Aims: To determine the acceptability and perceived benefit of prehabilitation in lung cancer among thoracic surgeons. Procedure: 198 cardiothoracic surgeons within Australia and New Zealand were surveyed to evaluate their attitudes and perceived benefits of prehabilitation in lung cancer. Results: Response rate was 14%. A moderate proportion of respondents reported that there is a need to refer lung resection patients to preoperative physiotherapy/prehabilitation, particularly high-risk patients or those with borderline fitness for surgery. 91% of surgeons were willing to delay surgery (as indicated by cancer stage/type) to optimize patients via prehabilitation. The main barriers to prehabilitation reported were patient comorbidities and access to allied health professionals, with 33% stating that they were unsure who to refer to for prehabilitation in thoracic surgery. This is despite 60% of the cohort reporting that pulmonary rehabilitation is available as a preoperative resource. 92% of respondents believe that further research into prehabilitation in lung cancer is warranted. Conclusion: The benefits of prehabilitation for the oncology population have been well documented in the literature over recent years and this is reflected in the perceptions surgeons had on the benefits of prehabilitation for their patients. This survey demonstrates an interest among cardiothoracic surgeons in favor of prehabilitation, and therefore further research and demonstration of its benefit is needed in lung cancer to facilitate implementation into practice.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420924466
work_keys_str_mv AT annashuklabappsc attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer
AT catherinelgrangerbphysiohonsphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer
AT gavinmwrightmbbsfracsphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer
AT laraedbrookebappscphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer
AT lindadenehybappscphd attitudesandperceptionstoprehabilitationinlungcancer
_version_ 1724551416946622464