Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are in high demand in financial markets. However, the ESG data provided by companies do not allow for use in the investment decision-making process. The main limiting point for this is a lack of comparability across companies. This paper analyzes the...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1093 |
id |
doaj-c7b9d499a2924847a6eddb34e7085515 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c7b9d499a2924847a6eddb34e70855152020-11-24T23:48:33ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-02-01114109310.3390/su11041093su11041093Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas IndustryAndrea Cardoni0Evgeniia Kiseleva1Simone Terzani2Department of Economics, University of Perugia, Via Alessandro Pascoli, 20, 06123 Perugia PG, ItalyDepartment of Economics, University of Perugia, Via Alessandro Pascoli, 20, 06123 Perugia PG, ItalyDepartment of Economics, University of Perugia, Via Alessandro Pascoli, 20, 06123 Perugia PG, ItalyEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are in high demand in financial markets. However, the ESG data provided by companies do not allow for use in the investment decision-making process. The main limiting point for this is a lack of comparability across companies. This paper analyzes the problem of comparability with the aim to evaluate the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports, framing the analysis on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards and discussing the results with the support of legitimacy and stakeholder theories. Drawing upon stakeholder and legitimacy theories, as well as financial and sustainability accounting concepts, we propose a theoretical framework of comparability and a methodology to evaluate the level of comparability on a sector-specific basis. The methodological approach adopted in this study is broadly qualitative, with the use of a multiple-stages model. Based on the example of one industry, we discovered that, despite comparability being mostly relevant to the listed companies from the oil and gas sector, the sustainability reports of these companies are still not comparable. Our findings reveal that, despite the availability of a large amount of ESG data and the existence of sustainability frameworks, the problem of comparability is still relevant even for companies that are theoretically most inclined to be comparable.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1093sustainability reportsESG informationGRI frameworkcomparabilityoil and gas |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Cardoni Evgeniia Kiseleva Simone Terzani |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Cardoni Evgeniia Kiseleva Simone Terzani Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry Sustainability sustainability reports ESG information GRI framework comparability oil and gas |
author_facet |
Andrea Cardoni Evgeniia Kiseleva Simone Terzani |
author_sort |
Andrea Cardoni |
title |
Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry |
title_short |
Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry |
title_full |
Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry |
title_sort |
evaluating the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports: the case of the oil and gas industry |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-02-01 |
description |
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are in high demand in financial markets. However, the ESG data provided by companies do not allow for use in the investment decision-making process. The main limiting point for this is a lack of comparability across companies. This paper analyzes the problem of comparability with the aim to evaluate the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports, framing the analysis on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards and discussing the results with the support of legitimacy and stakeholder theories. Drawing upon stakeholder and legitimacy theories, as well as financial and sustainability accounting concepts, we propose a theoretical framework of comparability and a methodology to evaluate the level of comparability on a sector-specific basis. The methodological approach adopted in this study is broadly qualitative, with the use of a multiple-stages model. Based on the example of one industry, we discovered that, despite comparability being mostly relevant to the listed companies from the oil and gas sector, the sustainability reports of these companies are still not comparable. Our findings reveal that, despite the availability of a large amount of ESG data and the existence of sustainability frameworks, the problem of comparability is still relevant even for companies that are theoretically most inclined to be comparable. |
topic |
sustainability reports ESG information GRI framework comparability oil and gas |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1093 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreacardoni evaluatingtheintraindustrycomparabilityofsustainabilityreportsthecaseoftheoilandgasindustry AT evgeniiakiseleva evaluatingtheintraindustrycomparabilityofsustainabilityreportsthecaseoftheoilandgasindustry AT simoneterzani evaluatingtheintraindustrycomparabilityofsustainabilityreportsthecaseoftheoilandgasindustry |
_version_ |
1725485678638137344 |