Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are in high demand in financial markets. However, the ESG data provided by companies do not allow for use in the investment decision-making process. The main limiting point for this is a lack of comparability across companies. This paper analyzes the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Cardoni, Evgeniia Kiseleva, Simone Terzani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1093
id doaj-c7b9d499a2924847a6eddb34e7085515
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7b9d499a2924847a6eddb34e70855152020-11-24T23:48:33ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-02-01114109310.3390/su11041093su11041093Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas IndustryAndrea Cardoni0Evgeniia Kiseleva1Simone Terzani2Department of Economics, University of Perugia, Via Alessandro Pascoli, 20, 06123 Perugia PG, ItalyDepartment of Economics, University of Perugia, Via Alessandro Pascoli, 20, 06123 Perugia PG, ItalyDepartment of Economics, University of Perugia, Via Alessandro Pascoli, 20, 06123 Perugia PG, ItalyEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are in high demand in financial markets. However, the ESG data provided by companies do not allow for use in the investment decision-making process. The main limiting point for this is a lack of comparability across companies. This paper analyzes the problem of comparability with the aim to evaluate the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports, framing the analysis on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards and discussing the results with the support of legitimacy and stakeholder theories. Drawing upon stakeholder and legitimacy theories, as well as financial and sustainability accounting concepts, we propose a theoretical framework of comparability and a methodology to evaluate the level of comparability on a sector-specific basis. The methodological approach adopted in this study is broadly qualitative, with the use of a multiple-stages model. Based on the example of one industry, we discovered that, despite comparability being mostly relevant to the listed companies from the oil and gas sector, the sustainability reports of these companies are still not comparable. Our findings reveal that, despite the availability of a large amount of ESG data and the existence of sustainability frameworks, the problem of comparability is still relevant even for companies that are theoretically most inclined to be comparable.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1093sustainability reportsESG informationGRI frameworkcomparabilityoil and gas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Cardoni
Evgeniia Kiseleva
Simone Terzani
spellingShingle Andrea Cardoni
Evgeniia Kiseleva
Simone Terzani
Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
Sustainability
sustainability reports
ESG information
GRI framework
comparability
oil and gas
author_facet Andrea Cardoni
Evgeniia Kiseleva
Simone Terzani
author_sort Andrea Cardoni
title Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
title_short Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
title_full Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
title_fullStr Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry
title_sort evaluating the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports: the case of the oil and gas industry
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are in high demand in financial markets. However, the ESG data provided by companies do not allow for use in the investment decision-making process. The main limiting point for this is a lack of comparability across companies. This paper analyzes the problem of comparability with the aim to evaluate the intra-industry comparability of sustainability reports, framing the analysis on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards and discussing the results with the support of legitimacy and stakeholder theories. Drawing upon stakeholder and legitimacy theories, as well as financial and sustainability accounting concepts, we propose a theoretical framework of comparability and a methodology to evaluate the level of comparability on a sector-specific basis. The methodological approach adopted in this study is broadly qualitative, with the use of a multiple-stages model. Based on the example of one industry, we discovered that, despite comparability being mostly relevant to the listed companies from the oil and gas sector, the sustainability reports of these companies are still not comparable. Our findings reveal that, despite the availability of a large amount of ESG data and the existence of sustainability frameworks, the problem of comparability is still relevant even for companies that are theoretically most inclined to be comparable.
topic sustainability reports
ESG information
GRI framework
comparability
oil and gas
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1093
work_keys_str_mv AT andreacardoni evaluatingtheintraindustrycomparabilityofsustainabilityreportsthecaseoftheoilandgasindustry
AT evgeniiakiseleva evaluatingtheintraindustrycomparabilityofsustainabilityreportsthecaseoftheoilandgasindustry
AT simoneterzani evaluatingtheintraindustrycomparabilityofsustainabilityreportsthecaseoftheoilandgasindustry
_version_ 1725485678638137344