The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?

INTRODUCTION:It is desirable for patients to play active roles in the choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patient decision aid tools (PDAs) have been developed to allow the patients to choose the option best suited to their individual needs. MATERIAL AND METHODS:An observational, prospective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario Prieto-Velasco, Pedro Quiros, Cesar Remon, Spanish Group for the Implementation of a Shared Decision Making Process for RRT Choice with Patient Decision Aid Tools
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4605797?pdf=render
id doaj-c7dfc5fb36ad407caedd910f676af6c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7dfc5fb36ad407caedd910f676af6c32020-11-25T02:35:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011010e013881110.1371/journal.pone.0138811The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?Mario Prieto-VelascoPedro QuirosCesar RemonSpanish Group for the Implementation of a Shared Decision Making Process for RRT Choice with Patient Decision Aid ToolsINTRODUCTION:It is desirable for patients to play active roles in the choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patient decision aid tools (PDAs) have been developed to allow the patients to choose the option best suited to their individual needs. MATERIAL AND METHODS:An observational, prospective registry was conducted in 26 Spanish hospitals between September 2010 and May 2012. The results of the patients' choice and the definitive RRT modality were registered through the progressive implementation of an Education Process (EP) with PDAs designed to help Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients choose RRT. RESULTS:Patients included in this study: 1044. Of these, 569 patients used PDAs and had made a definitive choice by the end of registration. A total of 88.4% of patients chose dialysis [43% hemodialysis (HD) and 45% peritoneal dialysis (PD)] 3.2% preemptive living-donor transplant (TX), and 8.4% conservative treatment (CT). A total of 399 patients began RRT during this period. The distribution was 93.4% dialysis (53.6% HD; 40% PD), 1.3% preemptive TX and 5.3% CT. The patients who followed the EP changed their mind significantly less often [kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95)] than those who did not follow it, despite starting unplanned treatment [kappa value of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95]. A higher agreement between the final choice and a definitive treatment was achieved by the EP and planned patients [kappa value of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98)]. Those who did not go through the EP had a much lower index of choosing PD and changed their decision more frequently when starting definitive treatment [kappa value of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.91)]. CONCLUSIONS:Free choice, assisted by PDAs, leads to a 50/50 distribution of PD and HD choice and an increase in TX choice. The use of PDAs, even with an unplanned start, achieved a high level of concordance between the chosen and definitive modality.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4605797?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mario Prieto-Velasco
Pedro Quiros
Cesar Remon
Spanish Group for the Implementation of a Shared Decision Making Process for RRT Choice with Patient Decision Aid Tools
spellingShingle Mario Prieto-Velasco
Pedro Quiros
Cesar Remon
Spanish Group for the Implementation of a Shared Decision Making Process for RRT Choice with Patient Decision Aid Tools
The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mario Prieto-Velasco
Pedro Quiros
Cesar Remon
Spanish Group for the Implementation of a Shared Decision Making Process for RRT Choice with Patient Decision Aid Tools
author_sort Mario Prieto-Velasco
title The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?
title_short The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?
title_full The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?
title_fullStr The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?
title_full_unstemmed The Concordance between Patients' Renal Replacement Therapy Choice and Definitive Modality: Is It a Utopia?
title_sort concordance between patients' renal replacement therapy choice and definitive modality: is it a utopia?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:It is desirable for patients to play active roles in the choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Patient decision aid tools (PDAs) have been developed to allow the patients to choose the option best suited to their individual needs. MATERIAL AND METHODS:An observational, prospective registry was conducted in 26 Spanish hospitals between September 2010 and May 2012. The results of the patients' choice and the definitive RRT modality were registered through the progressive implementation of an Education Process (EP) with PDAs designed to help Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients choose RRT. RESULTS:Patients included in this study: 1044. Of these, 569 patients used PDAs and had made a definitive choice by the end of registration. A total of 88.4% of patients chose dialysis [43% hemodialysis (HD) and 45% peritoneal dialysis (PD)] 3.2% preemptive living-donor transplant (TX), and 8.4% conservative treatment (CT). A total of 399 patients began RRT during this period. The distribution was 93.4% dialysis (53.6% HD; 40% PD), 1.3% preemptive TX and 5.3% CT. The patients who followed the EP changed their mind significantly less often [kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95)] than those who did not follow it, despite starting unplanned treatment [kappa value of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.95]. A higher agreement between the final choice and a definitive treatment was achieved by the EP and planned patients [kappa value of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98)]. Those who did not go through the EP had a much lower index of choosing PD and changed their decision more frequently when starting definitive treatment [kappa value of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.91)]. CONCLUSIONS:Free choice, assisted by PDAs, leads to a 50/50 distribution of PD and HD choice and an increase in TX choice. The use of PDAs, even with an unplanned start, achieved a high level of concordance between the chosen and definitive modality.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4605797?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marioprietovelasco theconcordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT pedroquiros theconcordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT cesarremon theconcordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT spanishgroupfortheimplementationofashareddecisionmakingprocessforrrtchoicewithpatientdecisionaidtools theconcordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT marioprietovelasco concordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT pedroquiros concordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT cesarremon concordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
AT spanishgroupfortheimplementationofashareddecisionmakingprocessforrrtchoicewithpatientdecisionaidtools concordancebetweenpatientsrenalreplacementtherapychoiceanddefinitivemodalityisitautopia
_version_ 1724804115617284096