SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION

Introduction: Hyperthrophic scar and keloid is a big problem after many operation. Hypertrophic scar depended on many factor one of them is Incision.
 Method: This is a randomized clinical trial and sequential sampling in Alzahra hospital and Kashani hospital. we selected two groups, one gro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M OMRANI FARD, M NOURI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2003-03-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3049
id doaj-c7ff9b47dd8e443e97d36635b28f65ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c7ff9b47dd8e443e97d36635b28f65ad2020-11-25T00:25:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362003-03-0181SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISIONM OMRANI FARDM NOURIIntroduction: Hyperthrophic scar and keloid is a big problem after many operation. Hypertrophic scar depended on many factor one of them is Incision.
 Method: This is a randomized clinical trial and sequential sampling in Alzahra hospital and Kashani hospital. we selected two groups, one group we used S shape incision and observed group linear incision. Age was between 10-30 years and dermatological problems and cigaret smoking was Negative in two groups perforated and secondly skin closure was excluded in our study. patient divided in two group each group was twenty and fllowed for one year. Patients satisfaction and skin collor normality and itchiny was evaluated in two groups.
 Results: Appearance of scar was different in collor much and shape. Normality for collor of incision in s shape groups were 68.4% but in linar incision was 31.6% (Pvalue= 0.026) with statically meaningful. Mean of scar width: In 5-shape =1.33+0.49mm in Linear shape = 2.23+0.92. P = 0.001. Prevalence of itching was same in both groups.
 Discussion: patients overall satisfaction and itching were the same for both groups. skin color normality was 68.4% in 5 shape incision groups versus 31.6% in linear incision groups which has been shown to be statistically meaningful using chi-square test so it seems reasonable to conclude that calor mathing is more favorable in 5 shape incisions rather than linear incision. Mean of scare width in licear incision group was 2.23+0.92 mm versus 1.32+0.49 mm in 5 shape incision group. this difference is also statistically meaningful using T test. 50 it can be concluded that using 5 shape incision is better because post operative scar is smaller and exposure is like linear incision. http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3049scar, keloid, hyperthrophic scar, incision, Linear incision, S incision, itching
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M OMRANI FARD
M NOURI
spellingShingle M OMRANI FARD
M NOURI
SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
scar, keloid, hyperthrophic scar, incision, Linear incision, S incision, itching
author_facet M OMRANI FARD
M NOURI
author_sort M OMRANI FARD
title SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION
title_short SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION
title_full SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION
title_fullStr SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION
title_full_unstemmed SCAR AFTER SURGICAL INCISION FOR APPENDECTOMY: S-SHAPE VS LINEAR INCISION
title_sort scar after surgical incision for appendectomy: s-shape vs linear incision
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2003-03-01
description Introduction: Hyperthrophic scar and keloid is a big problem after many operation. Hypertrophic scar depended on many factor one of them is Incision.
 Method: This is a randomized clinical trial and sequential sampling in Alzahra hospital and Kashani hospital. we selected two groups, one group we used S shape incision and observed group linear incision. Age was between 10-30 years and dermatological problems and cigaret smoking was Negative in two groups perforated and secondly skin closure was excluded in our study. patient divided in two group each group was twenty and fllowed for one year. Patients satisfaction and skin collor normality and itchiny was evaluated in two groups.
 Results: Appearance of scar was different in collor much and shape. Normality for collor of incision in s shape groups were 68.4% but in linar incision was 31.6% (Pvalue= 0.026) with statically meaningful. Mean of scar width: In 5-shape =1.33+0.49mm in Linear shape = 2.23+0.92. P = 0.001. Prevalence of itching was same in both groups.
 Discussion: patients overall satisfaction and itching were the same for both groups. skin color normality was 68.4% in 5 shape incision groups versus 31.6% in linear incision groups which has been shown to be statistically meaningful using chi-square test so it seems reasonable to conclude that calor mathing is more favorable in 5 shape incisions rather than linear incision. Mean of scare width in licear incision group was 2.23+0.92 mm versus 1.32+0.49 mm in 5 shape incision group. this difference is also statistically meaningful using T test. 50 it can be concluded that using 5 shape incision is better because post operative scar is smaller and exposure is like linear incision.
topic scar, keloid, hyperthrophic scar, incision, Linear incision, S incision, itching
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3049
work_keys_str_mv AT momranifard scaraftersurgicalincisionforappendectomysshapevslinearincision
AT mnouri scaraftersurgicalincisionforappendectomysshapevslinearincision
_version_ 1725349777618501632