Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease
Tino Prell,1,2 Denise Schaller,1 Caroline Perner,1,3 Gabriele Helga Franke,4 Otto W Witte,1,2 Albrecht Kunze,1 Julian Grosskreutz1,2 1Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; 2Center for Healthy Aging, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; 3Center for Immunology and Infl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Patient Preference and Adherence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-anonymous-versus-nonanonymous-responses-to-a-medication--peer-reviewed-article-PPA |
id |
doaj-c89d30d8a2ce4d55bbfa1fe20d981866 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c89d30d8a2ce4d55bbfa1fe20d9818662020-11-24T21:34:57ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2019-01-01Volume 1315115543672Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s diseasePrell TSchaller DPerner CFranke GHWitte OWKunze AGrosskreutz JTino Prell,1,2 Denise Schaller,1 Caroline Perner,1,3 Gabriele Helga Franke,4 Otto W Witte,1,2 Albrecht Kunze,1 Julian Grosskreutz1,2 1Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; 2Center for Healthy Aging, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; 3Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; 4University of Applied Sciences, Psychology of Rehabilitation, Stendal, Germany Purpose: Adherence to medication can be assessed by various self-report questionnaires. One could hypothesize that survey respondents tend to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. We aimed to answer if anonymous and nonanonymous responses to a questionnaire on medication adherence differ.Patients and methods: Adherence was assessed with the German Stendal Adherence with Medication Score (SAMS), which includes 18 questions with responses based on a 5-point Likert scale. Anonymous data from 40 subjects were collected during a symposium for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and nonanonymous data were obtained from 40 outpatient-clinic PD patients at the Department of Neurology.Results: The two groups (anonymous self-reported questionnaire and nonanonymous) did not differ in terms of demographical characteristics and the SAMS sum score. However, anonymously collected data showed significant higher scoring for the item 6 (“Do you forget your medications?”) than the data collected nonanonymously (P=0.017). All other items of the SAMS did not significantly differ between both groups.Conclusion: Overall assessment of adherence does not depend on whether the patient remains anonymous or not. There seems to be no relevant social desirability bias in nonanonymous responses. Keywords: self-report, adherence questionnaire, Parkinson’s disease, anonymous, nonadherencehttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-anonymous-versus-nonanonymous-responses-to-a-medication--peer-reviewed-article-PPAself-reportadherence questionnaireParkinson´s diseaseanonymous |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Prell T Schaller D Perner C Franke GH Witte OW Kunze A Grosskreutz J |
spellingShingle |
Prell T Schaller D Perner C Franke GH Witte OW Kunze A Grosskreutz J Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease Patient Preference and Adherence self-report adherence questionnaire Parkinson´s disease anonymous |
author_facet |
Prell T Schaller D Perner C Franke GH Witte OW Kunze A Grosskreutz J |
author_sort |
Prell T |
title |
Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease |
title_short |
Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease |
title_full |
Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease |
title_sort |
comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with parkinson’s disease |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Patient Preference and Adherence |
issn |
1177-889X |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Tino Prell,1,2 Denise Schaller,1 Caroline Perner,1,3 Gabriele Helga Franke,4 Otto W Witte,1,2 Albrecht Kunze,1 Julian Grosskreutz1,2 1Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; 2Center for Healthy Aging, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; 3Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; 4University of Applied Sciences, Psychology of Rehabilitation, Stendal, Germany Purpose: Adherence to medication can be assessed by various self-report questionnaires. One could hypothesize that survey respondents tend to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. We aimed to answer if anonymous and nonanonymous responses to a questionnaire on medication adherence differ.Patients and methods: Adherence was assessed with the German Stendal Adherence with Medication Score (SAMS), which includes 18 questions with responses based on a 5-point Likert scale. Anonymous data from 40 subjects were collected during a symposium for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and nonanonymous data were obtained from 40 outpatient-clinic PD patients at the Department of Neurology.Results: The two groups (anonymous self-reported questionnaire and nonanonymous) did not differ in terms of demographical characteristics and the SAMS sum score. However, anonymously collected data showed significant higher scoring for the item 6 (“Do you forget your medications?”) than the data collected nonanonymously (P=0.017). All other items of the SAMS did not significantly differ between both groups.Conclusion: Overall assessment of adherence does not depend on whether the patient remains anonymous or not. There seems to be no relevant social desirability bias in nonanonymous responses. Keywords: self-report, adherence questionnaire, Parkinson’s disease, anonymous, nonadherence |
topic |
self-report adherence questionnaire Parkinson´s disease anonymous |
url |
https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-anonymous-versus-nonanonymous-responses-to-a-medication--peer-reviewed-article-PPA |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT prellt comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease AT schallerd comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease AT pernerc comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease AT frankegh comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease AT witteow comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease AT kunzea comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease AT grosskreutzj comparisonofanonymousversusnonanonymousresponsestoamedicationadherencequestionnaireinpatientswithparkinsonrsquosdisease |
_version_ |
1725947199679889408 |