27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane

Abstract Background This study compared the postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy performed for the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods The study design was single center, retrospective, interventional case series. Two hundred consecutive eyes that underwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saigen Naruse, Hiroyuki Shimada, Ryusaburo Mori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-017-0585-1
id doaj-c8be1dd3949c4d73836ed53638ec02ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8be1dd3949c4d73836ed53638ec02ff2020-11-25T00:08:39ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152017-10-011711710.1186/s12886-017-0585-127-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membraneSaigen Naruse0Hiroyuki Shimada1Ryusaburo Mori2Miyahara Ophthalmological ClinicDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nihon University HospitalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nihon University HospitalAbstract Background This study compared the postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy performed for the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods The study design was single center, retrospective, interventional case series. Two hundred consecutive eyes that underwent primary vitrectomy for ERM (27-G vitrectomy in 100 eyes and 25-G vitrectomy in 100 eyes) were studied for 6 months. In all eyes, scleral tunnels were made using angle incisions, and air or gas exchange was performed. Results There were no significant differences in age, spherical diopter power, as well as preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score, central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure between the 27-G and 25-G groups. The proportions of simultaneous cataract surgery (27-G vs. 25-G: 82% vs. 90%), air-filled eyes (99% vs. 98%), and scleral wound suture at the end of surgery (0% vs. 0%) were not significantly different between two groups. The mean operation time for vitrectomy was significantly (P = 0.0322) longer by 4 min for 27-G (37 min) compared to 25-G (33 min) vitrectomy. Gain in ETDRS score was significantly (P = 0.0421) better in 27-G group (4.7 ± 8.1 letters) compared to 25-G group (1.1 ± 13.6 letters) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.0835 and 0.0569, respectively). Decrease in CRT was significantly (P = 0.0354) greater in 27-G group (−24.2 ± 50.0 μm) compared to 25-G group (−8.0 ± 48.6 μm) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.6059 and 0.1725, respectively). On postoperative day 1, hypotony (≤ 6 mmHg) was observed in 2 eyes in 27-G group and 6 eyes in 25-G group, while ocular hypertension (≥ 25 mmHg) was found in 4 eyes in 27-G group and 11 eyes in 25-G group, with no significant differences between two groups. Postoperative complications requiring treatment occurred in one eye (vitreous hemorrhage) in 27-G group, and in two eyes (vitreous hemorrhage and retinal detachment in one eye each) in 25-G group. Conclusions Although 27-G vitrectomy requires operation time of 4 min longer compared to 25-G vitrectomy for ERM surgery, using the 27-G system results in earlier recovery of visual acuity, CRT improvement and stabilized ocular pressure.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-017-0585-1Angled incisionDay surgeryCentral retinal thicknessHypotonyIdiopathic epiretinal membraneOcular hypertension
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saigen Naruse
Hiroyuki Shimada
Ryusaburo Mori
spellingShingle Saigen Naruse
Hiroyuki Shimada
Ryusaburo Mori
27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
BMC Ophthalmology
Angled incision
Day surgery
Central retinal thickness
Hypotony
Idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Ocular hypertension
author_facet Saigen Naruse
Hiroyuki Shimada
Ryusaburo Mori
author_sort Saigen Naruse
title 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
title_short 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
title_full 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
title_fullStr 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
title_full_unstemmed 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
title_sort 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background This study compared the postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy performed for the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods The study design was single center, retrospective, interventional case series. Two hundred consecutive eyes that underwent primary vitrectomy for ERM (27-G vitrectomy in 100 eyes and 25-G vitrectomy in 100 eyes) were studied for 6 months. In all eyes, scleral tunnels were made using angle incisions, and air or gas exchange was performed. Results There were no significant differences in age, spherical diopter power, as well as preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score, central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure between the 27-G and 25-G groups. The proportions of simultaneous cataract surgery (27-G vs. 25-G: 82% vs. 90%), air-filled eyes (99% vs. 98%), and scleral wound suture at the end of surgery (0% vs. 0%) were not significantly different between two groups. The mean operation time for vitrectomy was significantly (P = 0.0322) longer by 4 min for 27-G (37 min) compared to 25-G (33 min) vitrectomy. Gain in ETDRS score was significantly (P = 0.0421) better in 27-G group (4.7 ± 8.1 letters) compared to 25-G group (1.1 ± 13.6 letters) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.0835 and 0.0569, respectively). Decrease in CRT was significantly (P = 0.0354) greater in 27-G group (−24.2 ± 50.0 μm) compared to 25-G group (−8.0 ± 48.6 μm) at 1 month post-vitrectomy, but not significantly different at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.6059 and 0.1725, respectively). On postoperative day 1, hypotony (≤ 6 mmHg) was observed in 2 eyes in 27-G group and 6 eyes in 25-G group, while ocular hypertension (≥ 25 mmHg) was found in 4 eyes in 27-G group and 11 eyes in 25-G group, with no significant differences between two groups. Postoperative complications requiring treatment occurred in one eye (vitreous hemorrhage) in 27-G group, and in two eyes (vitreous hemorrhage and retinal detachment in one eye each) in 25-G group. Conclusions Although 27-G vitrectomy requires operation time of 4 min longer compared to 25-G vitrectomy for ERM surgery, using the 27-G system results in earlier recovery of visual acuity, CRT improvement and stabilized ocular pressure.
topic Angled incision
Day surgery
Central retinal thickness
Hypotony
Idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Ocular hypertension
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12886-017-0585-1
work_keys_str_mv AT saigennaruse 27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomydaysurgeryforidiopathicepiretinalmembrane
AT hiroyukishimada 27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomydaysurgeryforidiopathicepiretinalmembrane
AT ryusaburomori 27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomydaysurgeryforidiopathicepiretinalmembrane
_version_ 1725415105768718336