Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care

In the current global environmental crisis medical aid and disaster relief is given by the UN and its branches, by governments and by NGOs, who regard it as their duty to address large-scale humanitarian catastrophes. The duty to give medical aid rests on traditional interpretations of health securi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander K. Lautensach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Librelloph 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Security
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.librelloph.com/journalofhumansecurity/article/view/186
id doaj-c8e749d1d3a149878c317abe5662a813
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c8e749d1d3a149878c317abe5662a8132020-11-24T20:55:20ZengLibrellophJournal of Human Security1835-38002015-01-0111151810.12924/johs2015.1101000570Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health CareAlexander K. Lautensach0School of Education, University of Northern British Columbia, 4837 Keith Ave. Terrace, B.C. V8G 1K7, CanadaIn the current global environmental crisis medical aid and disaster relief is given by the UN and its branches, by governments and by NGOs, who regard it as their duty to address large-scale humanitarian catastrophes. The duty to give medical aid rests on traditional interpretations of health security and on the bioethical imperatives to relieve suffering and to save lives. However, those principles are not easily reconciled in the current situation of global environmental change and the threats it poses to human security. The global demand for health care has already outpaced resources in many regions, and those resources are likely to decline further. An ethic based on more comprehensive concepts of human security can lessen the contra­dictions between ethical priorities because it takes into account environmental security. How­ever, that approach leads to clashes with common interpretations of human rights, including the so-called right to health care. The argument presented in this paper states that, under the imperative of ensuring the survival for humanity in acceptable and sustainable ways, the latest generation of human rights pertaining to health care and environmental quality have become ungrantable. While this does not render them negligible, it does necessitate a new approach to global development aid and health security, with severe consequences for individual autonomy.http://www.librelloph.com/journalofhumansecurity/article/view/186bioethicsglobal health carehealth securityhuman rightssustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander K. Lautensach
spellingShingle Alexander K. Lautensach
Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care
Journal of Human Security
bioethics
global health care
health security
human rights
sustainability
author_facet Alexander K. Lautensach
author_sort Alexander K. Lautensach
title Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care
title_short Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care
title_full Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care
title_fullStr Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Health for All? The Tension Between Human Security and the Right to Health Care
title_sort sustainable health for all? the tension between human security and the right to health care
publisher Librelloph
series Journal of Human Security
issn 1835-3800
publishDate 2015-01-01
description In the current global environmental crisis medical aid and disaster relief is given by the UN and its branches, by governments and by NGOs, who regard it as their duty to address large-scale humanitarian catastrophes. The duty to give medical aid rests on traditional interpretations of health security and on the bioethical imperatives to relieve suffering and to save lives. However, those principles are not easily reconciled in the current situation of global environmental change and the threats it poses to human security. The global demand for health care has already outpaced resources in many regions, and those resources are likely to decline further. An ethic based on more comprehensive concepts of human security can lessen the contra­dictions between ethical priorities because it takes into account environmental security. How­ever, that approach leads to clashes with common interpretations of human rights, including the so-called right to health care. The argument presented in this paper states that, under the imperative of ensuring the survival for humanity in acceptable and sustainable ways, the latest generation of human rights pertaining to health care and environmental quality have become ungrantable. While this does not render them negligible, it does necessitate a new approach to global development aid and health security, with severe consequences for individual autonomy.
topic bioethics
global health care
health security
human rights
sustainability
url http://www.librelloph.com/journalofhumansecurity/article/view/186
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderklautensach sustainablehealthforallthetensionbetweenhumansecurityandtherighttohealthcare
_version_ 1716791741902749696