Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is still considered as a major health problem in the world including in Indonesia, which is regarded as one of the malaria-endemic countries. Since 2006, WHO has recommended the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to treat unco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ani Isnawati, Retno Gitawati, Mariana Raini, Indri Rooslamiati, Lanny Marliany, Effi Setiawati, Vivi Setiawaty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: DiscoverSys 2018-08-01
Series:Bali Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/822
id doaj-c9318ad8a833471f90b7302ec7bf609a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9318ad8a833471f90b7302ec7bf609a2020-11-25T02:25:02ZengDiscoverSysBali Medical Journal2089-11802302-29142018-08-017229029510.15562/bmj.v7i2.822466Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteersAni IsnawatiRetno GitawatiMariana RainiIndri RooslamiatiLanny MarlianyEffi SetiawatiVivi Setiawaty<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is still considered as a major health problem in the world including in Indonesia, which is regarded as one of the malaria-endemic countries. Since 2006, WHO has recommended the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria. In Indonesia, DHP tablet (combination of dihydroartemisinin and piperaquine) is the first line therapy used in malaria control program, which currently used imported DHP tablet. To produce generic DHP tablet, comparative bioequivalence test between DHP tablet and the drug previously used is needed. <strong>Methods: </strong>A single dosed, randomized, double-blinded, one-period, and parallel study design was conducted in the present research. Every twenty-four subjects were assigned into two groups, which are test group and comparison group. <strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that even though in vitro comparison of dissolution test has fulfilled the requirements, in vivo test results has not fulfilled the bioequivalence standards. Obtained geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to comparator drug for dihydroartemisinin were 83.30% (67.06%–103.48%) for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, 83.24% (67.10%–103.26%) for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, and 75.67% (61.83%–92.61%) for C<sub>max</sub>. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to comparator drug for piperaquine were 97.31% (76.50%–123.80%) for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, 94.18% (74.18%–119.59%) for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, and 96.47% (71.80%–129.62%) for C<sub>max</sub>. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therefore, the pharmacokinetic profile of the test drug is concluded to be bio-inequivalent with the comparator drug.</p>https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/822dihydroartemisininpiperaquinepharmacokineticsbioequivalence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ani Isnawati
Retno Gitawati
Mariana Raini
Indri Rooslamiati
Lanny Marliany
Effi Setiawati
Vivi Setiawaty
spellingShingle Ani Isnawati
Retno Gitawati
Mariana Raini
Indri Rooslamiati
Lanny Marliany
Effi Setiawati
Vivi Setiawaty
Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers
Bali Medical Journal
dihydroartemisinin
piperaquine
pharmacokinetics
bioequivalence
author_facet Ani Isnawati
Retno Gitawati
Mariana Raini
Indri Rooslamiati
Lanny Marliany
Effi Setiawati
Vivi Setiawaty
author_sort Ani Isnawati
title Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers
title_short Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers
title_full Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers
title_fullStr Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy Indonesian volunteers
title_sort bioequivalence study of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (dhp) generic formulation in fixed-dose combination, in healthy indonesian volunteers
publisher DiscoverSys
series Bali Medical Journal
issn 2089-1180
2302-2914
publishDate 2018-08-01
description <p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is still considered as a major health problem in the world including in Indonesia, which is regarded as one of the malaria-endemic countries. Since 2006, WHO has recommended the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria. In Indonesia, DHP tablet (combination of dihydroartemisinin and piperaquine) is the first line therapy used in malaria control program, which currently used imported DHP tablet. To produce generic DHP tablet, comparative bioequivalence test between DHP tablet and the drug previously used is needed. <strong>Methods: </strong>A single dosed, randomized, double-blinded, one-period, and parallel study design was conducted in the present research. Every twenty-four subjects were assigned into two groups, which are test group and comparison group. <strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that even though in vitro comparison of dissolution test has fulfilled the requirements, in vivo test results has not fulfilled the bioequivalence standards. Obtained geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to comparator drug for dihydroartemisinin were 83.30% (67.06%–103.48%) for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, 83.24% (67.10%–103.26%) for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, and 75.67% (61.83%–92.61%) for C<sub>max</sub>. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug to comparator drug for piperaquine were 97.31% (76.50%–123.80%) for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, 94.18% (74.18%–119.59%) for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, and 96.47% (71.80%–129.62%) for C<sub>max</sub>. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therefore, the pharmacokinetic profile of the test drug is concluded to be bio-inequivalent with the comparator drug.</p>
topic dihydroartemisinin
piperaquine
pharmacokinetics
bioequivalence
url https://balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/822
work_keys_str_mv AT aniisnawati bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
AT retnogitawati bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
AT marianaraini bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
AT indrirooslamiati bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
AT lannymarliany bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
AT effisetiawati bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
AT vivisetiawaty bioequivalencestudyofdihydroartemisininpiperaquinedhpgenericformulationinfixeddosecombinationinhealthyindonesianvolunteers
_version_ 1724853123953983488