Beyond quality improvement: exploring why primary care teams engage in a voluntary audit and feedback program
Abstract Background Despite its popularity, the effectiveness of audit and feedback in support quality improvement efforts is mixed. While audit and feedback-related research efforts have investigated issues relating to feedback design and delivery, little attention has been directed towards factors...
Main Authors: | Daniel J. Wagner, Janet Durbin, Jan Barnsley, Noah M. Ivers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2765-3 |
Similar Items
-
Measurement without management: qualitative evaluation of a voluntary audit & feedback intervention for primary care teams
by: Daniel J. Wagner, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Unpacking the intention to action gap: a qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback
by: Laura Desveaux, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence
by: Wouter T. Gude, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
by: Heather L. Colquhoun, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care
by: Wouter T. Gude, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)