The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy

his philosophy with Iranian mysticism. Such identification is fundamentally flawed and contradicts Nietzsche's ontological principles and moral values. Some of the Iranian commentators, expert in Nietzsche's philosophy, identified Nietzsche's thought is pregnant from the epic universa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reza Samim, Farhad Soleimannejad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tabriz 2016-12-01
Series:Philosophical Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5761.html
id doaj-c9b9f56859dd43ac8536fc36195548fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9b9f56859dd43ac8536fc36195548fb2020-11-24T22:14:29ZengUniversity of TabrizPhilosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192016-12-011019273302 The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's PhilosophyReza Samim0Farhad Soleimannejad1Assistant Professor Social studies, ISCSM.A. of art recherche student, University of Science and Culturehis philosophy with Iranian mysticism. Such identification is fundamentally flawed and contradicts Nietzsche's ontological principles and moral values. Some of the Iranian commentators, expert in Nietzsche's philosophy, identified Nietzsche's thought is pregnant from the epic universal values, not the mystical patterns. Understanding of Nietzsche's Philosophy is possible with the help of Shahnameh and Iliad not mysticism. The reason of this fundamental error lies in the fact that these Iranian commentators fail to distinguish the subtle differences between mysticism and epic, and this failure, has led to their mixing Nietzsche's thought with the Iranian mysticism. Epic and mysticism are related in the differences not the similarities. Although there could be some similarities between the mystical worldview and that of epic, they are merely outward and superficial. In effect, in the matter of epistemic, moral and ontological principles, epic contradicts mysticism. At the best, mysticism can be considered to be the negative correspondence of epic and called “Negative Epic”. Nietzsche's thought has been affected to a greater extent by the Greek culture than and prior to the Iranian traditions. Nietzche's symbolic recourse to Zoroaster cannot be a cogent basis for these commentators' claim. Moreover, Nietzche's grasp of Zoroastrian worldview is so much blurred and incomplete. He appreciates the Greek culture not the Iranian traditions. Therefore, autonomy, voluntarism, appreciation of life and denunciation of passivity are the set of values and principles associating Nietzsche's philosophy with epic. These are exactly the principles disregarded and even denied in mystical thought. In other words, Nietzsche's philosophy can be considered the rebirth of the epic in the sphere of philosophical thought.http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5761.htmlNietzschemysticismepicnegative epicepic moralepic ontology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reza Samim
Farhad Soleimannejad
spellingShingle Reza Samim
Farhad Soleimannejad
The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy
Philosophical Investigations
Nietzsche
mysticism
epic
negative epic
epic moral
epic ontology
author_facet Reza Samim
Farhad Soleimannejad
author_sort Reza Samim
title The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy
title_short The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy
title_full The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy
title_fullStr The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed The rebirth of the epic from the Nietzsche's Philosophy
title_sort rebirth of the epic from the nietzsche's philosophy
publisher University of Tabriz
series Philosophical Investigations
issn 2251-7960
2423-4419
publishDate 2016-12-01
description his philosophy with Iranian mysticism. Such identification is fundamentally flawed and contradicts Nietzsche's ontological principles and moral values. Some of the Iranian commentators, expert in Nietzsche's philosophy, identified Nietzsche's thought is pregnant from the epic universal values, not the mystical patterns. Understanding of Nietzsche's Philosophy is possible with the help of Shahnameh and Iliad not mysticism. The reason of this fundamental error lies in the fact that these Iranian commentators fail to distinguish the subtle differences between mysticism and epic, and this failure, has led to their mixing Nietzsche's thought with the Iranian mysticism. Epic and mysticism are related in the differences not the similarities. Although there could be some similarities between the mystical worldview and that of epic, they are merely outward and superficial. In effect, in the matter of epistemic, moral and ontological principles, epic contradicts mysticism. At the best, mysticism can be considered to be the negative correspondence of epic and called “Negative Epic”. Nietzsche's thought has been affected to a greater extent by the Greek culture than and prior to the Iranian traditions. Nietzche's symbolic recourse to Zoroaster cannot be a cogent basis for these commentators' claim. Moreover, Nietzche's grasp of Zoroastrian worldview is so much blurred and incomplete. He appreciates the Greek culture not the Iranian traditions. Therefore, autonomy, voluntarism, appreciation of life and denunciation of passivity are the set of values and principles associating Nietzsche's philosophy with epic. These are exactly the principles disregarded and even denied in mystical thought. In other words, Nietzsche's philosophy can be considered the rebirth of the epic in the sphere of philosophical thought.
topic Nietzsche
mysticism
epic
negative epic
epic moral
epic ontology
url http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5761.html
work_keys_str_mv AT rezasamim therebirthoftheepicfromthenietzschesphilosophy
AT farhadsoleimannejad therebirthoftheepicfromthenietzschesphilosophy
AT rezasamim rebirthoftheepicfromthenietzschesphilosophy
AT farhadsoleimannejad rebirthoftheepicfromthenietzschesphilosophy
_version_ 1725798702689288192