Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of additional enrichment materials (EMs; pecking stones and alfalfa bales) on the occurrence of plumage damage, skin injuries, and toe injuries, with an emphasis on the possible differences between commercial hybrid strains of laying hens. During r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruben Schreiter, Klaus Damme, Markus Freick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2434
id doaj-c9c0649a79f341939668832177f59cc7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9c0649a79f341939668832177f59cc72020-12-19T00:05:49ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-12-01102434243410.3390/ani10122434Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?Ruben Schreiter0Klaus Damme1Markus Freick2ZAFT e.V. Centre for Applied Research and Technology, D-01069 Dresden, GermanyBavarian State Farms, Research and Education Center for Poultry, D-97318 Kitzingen, GermanyZAFT e.V. Centre for Applied Research and Technology, D-01069 Dresden, GermanyThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of additional enrichment materials (EMs; pecking stones and alfalfa bales) on the occurrence of plumage damage, skin injuries, and toe injuries, with an emphasis on the possible differences between commercial hybrid strains of laying hens. During rearing (weeks 1–18, 16 compartments, 4000 pullets) and laying periods (weeks 21–72, 24 compartments, 2808 hens) in a littered housing system, EMs were permanently provided to the study groups (EXP), while control groups (CON) did not receive additional EM. In a two-factorial study design (two groups with four strains) with 351 hens per variant, the brown egg-laying Lohmann Brown classic (LB) and Bovans Brown (BB) strains as well as the white egg-laying Lohmann Selected Leghorn classic (LSL) and Dekalb White (DW) strains were investigated. Compared to the CON, the EXP showed reduced body mass during rearing (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and reduced albumen consistency in the laying period (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding integument condition, the LSL in the EXP showed more toe injuries than in the CON (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Remarkably, genotype–environment interactions between strains and groups were evident (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In groups with an EM supply, plumage damage decreased in LB (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.033) and LSL (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.005) but increased in BB (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). Moreover, there were fewer skin injuries in LSL (<i>p</i> = 0.001) but more in BB (<i>p</i> = 0.001) in groups with access to EM. In view of the diverging effects between strains, future practical recommendations for laying hen husbandry should be strain-specific.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2434egg productionanimal welfarelayerspulletsfeather peckinggenotype–environment interaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ruben Schreiter
Klaus Damme
Markus Freick
spellingShingle Ruben Schreiter
Klaus Damme
Markus Freick
Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?
Animals
egg production
animal welfare
layers
pullets
feather pecking
genotype–environment interaction
author_facet Ruben Schreiter
Klaus Damme
Markus Freick
author_sort Ruben Schreiter
title Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?
title_short Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?
title_full Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?
title_fullStr Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?
title_full_unstemmed Edible Environmental Enrichments in Littered Housing Systems: Do Their Effects on Integument Condition Differ Between Commercial Laying Hen Strains?
title_sort edible environmental enrichments in littered housing systems: do their effects on integument condition differ between commercial laying hen strains?
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of additional enrichment materials (EMs; pecking stones and alfalfa bales) on the occurrence of plumage damage, skin injuries, and toe injuries, with an emphasis on the possible differences between commercial hybrid strains of laying hens. During rearing (weeks 1–18, 16 compartments, 4000 pullets) and laying periods (weeks 21–72, 24 compartments, 2808 hens) in a littered housing system, EMs were permanently provided to the study groups (EXP), while control groups (CON) did not receive additional EM. In a two-factorial study design (two groups with four strains) with 351 hens per variant, the brown egg-laying Lohmann Brown classic (LB) and Bovans Brown (BB) strains as well as the white egg-laying Lohmann Selected Leghorn classic (LSL) and Dekalb White (DW) strains were investigated. Compared to the CON, the EXP showed reduced body mass during rearing (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and reduced albumen consistency in the laying period (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding integument condition, the LSL in the EXP showed more toe injuries than in the CON (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Remarkably, genotype–environment interactions between strains and groups were evident (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In groups with an EM supply, plumage damage decreased in LB (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.033) and LSL (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.005) but increased in BB (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). Moreover, there were fewer skin injuries in LSL (<i>p</i> = 0.001) but more in BB (<i>p</i> = 0.001) in groups with access to EM. In view of the diverging effects between strains, future practical recommendations for laying hen husbandry should be strain-specific.
topic egg production
animal welfare
layers
pullets
feather pecking
genotype–environment interaction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2434
work_keys_str_mv AT rubenschreiter edibleenvironmentalenrichmentsinlitteredhousingsystemsdotheireffectsonintegumentconditiondifferbetweencommerciallayinghenstrains
AT klausdamme edibleenvironmentalenrichmentsinlitteredhousingsystemsdotheireffectsonintegumentconditiondifferbetweencommerciallayinghenstrains
AT markusfreick edibleenvironmentalenrichmentsinlitteredhousingsystemsdotheireffectsonintegumentconditiondifferbetweencommerciallayinghenstrains
_version_ 1724378137729433600