How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?

Sun-synchronous optical and thermal remote sensing is a promising technique to provide instantaneous ET (evapotranspiration) estimates during satellite overpass. The common approach to extrapolate the instantaneous estimates to values for daily or longer periods relies on the assumption that the EF...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Peng, M. Borsche, Y. Liu, A. Loew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-10-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/3913/2013/hess-17-3913-2013.pdf
id doaj-c9c9ec9052864847bbb94b610803dd91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9c9ec9052864847bbb94b610803dd912020-11-24T22:59:51ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382013-10-0117103913391910.5194/hess-17-3913-2013How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?J. PengM. BorscheY. LiuA. LoewSun-synchronous optical and thermal remote sensing is a promising technique to provide instantaneous ET (evapotranspiration) estimates during satellite overpass. The common approach to extrapolate the instantaneous estimates to values for daily or longer periods relies on the assumption that the EF (evaporative fraction, defined as the ratio of latent heat flux to surface available energy) remains nearly constant during daytime. However, there is still no consensus on the validity of the self-preservation of the EF. We use FLUXNET (a global network of eddy covariance stations) measurements to examine this self-preservation, and the conditions under which it can hold. It is found that the instantaneous EF could represent daytime EF under clear sky conditions, especially between 11:00 and 14:00 LT (local time) for all stations. However, the results show that the EF is more variable during cloudy sky conditions, so that an increase in cloud cover results in an increase in the variability of the EF during daytime.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/3913/2013/hess-17-3913-2013.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Peng
M. Borsche
Y. Liu
A. Loew
spellingShingle J. Peng
M. Borsche
Y. Liu
A. Loew
How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet J. Peng
M. Borsche
Y. Liu
A. Loew
author_sort J. Peng
title How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
title_short How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
title_full How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
title_fullStr How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
title_full_unstemmed How representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
title_sort how representative are instantaneous evaporative fraction measurements of daytime fluxes?
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Sun-synchronous optical and thermal remote sensing is a promising technique to provide instantaneous ET (evapotranspiration) estimates during satellite overpass. The common approach to extrapolate the instantaneous estimates to values for daily or longer periods relies on the assumption that the EF (evaporative fraction, defined as the ratio of latent heat flux to surface available energy) remains nearly constant during daytime. However, there is still no consensus on the validity of the self-preservation of the EF. We use FLUXNET (a global network of eddy covariance stations) measurements to examine this self-preservation, and the conditions under which it can hold. It is found that the instantaneous EF could represent daytime EF under clear sky conditions, especially between 11:00 and 14:00 LT (local time) for all stations. However, the results show that the EF is more variable during cloudy sky conditions, so that an increase in cloud cover results in an increase in the variability of the EF during daytime.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/3913/2013/hess-17-3913-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jpeng howrepresentativeareinstantaneousevaporativefractionmeasurementsofdaytimefluxes
AT mborsche howrepresentativeareinstantaneousevaporativefractionmeasurementsofdaytimefluxes
AT yliu howrepresentativeareinstantaneousevaporativefractionmeasurementsofdaytimefluxes
AT aloew howrepresentativeareinstantaneousevaporativefractionmeasurementsofdaytimefluxes
_version_ 1725643667987759104