Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto

In the European and world-wide scenario of linguistic justice offered by van Parijs (2011), it is argued that we need one lingua franca only and that the only suitable candidate is English. In order to sustain his argument, the author has to reject three known alternatives against the English-only s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gobbo Federico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-10-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0008
id doaj-c9d07f813cf14ed9aa596511288a657a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c9d07f813cf14ed9aa596511288a657a2021-09-06T19:40:18ZengSciendoActa Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies2068-75832016-10-0191556110.1515/auseur-2016-0008auseur-2016-0008Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and EsperantoGobbo Federico0Universities of Amsterdam / Milano-Bicocca / TorinoIn the European and world-wide scenario of linguistic justice offered by van Parijs (2011), it is argued that we need one lingua franca only and that the only suitable candidate is English. In order to sustain his argument, the author has to reject three known alternatives against the English-only scenario. The second alternative is Esperanto. Van Parijs argues that there are some inner defects in the Esperanto language, and therefore Esperanto is not suitable for the role of world-wide lingua franca. This paper offers counterarguments based on the evidence of facts, showing that if nowadays Esperanto is only a lesser-used language the reason is not in the inner traits of the language, rather in geopolitical decisions. I argue that in the most probable global scenario English still plays the actual major role, but along with other cultural languages being regional lingua francas.https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0008linguistic justiceesperantopolitical neutralitycultural languagesregional lingua francas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gobbo Federico
spellingShingle Gobbo Federico
Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
linguistic justice
esperanto
political neutrality
cultural languages
regional lingua francas
author_facet Gobbo Federico
author_sort Gobbo Federico
title Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
title_short Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
title_full Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
title_fullStr Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto
title_sort linguistic justice, van parijs, and esperanto
publisher Sciendo
series Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
issn 2068-7583
publishDate 2016-10-01
description In the European and world-wide scenario of linguistic justice offered by van Parijs (2011), it is argued that we need one lingua franca only and that the only suitable candidate is English. In order to sustain his argument, the author has to reject three known alternatives against the English-only scenario. The second alternative is Esperanto. Van Parijs argues that there are some inner defects in the Esperanto language, and therefore Esperanto is not suitable for the role of world-wide lingua franca. This paper offers counterarguments based on the evidence of facts, showing that if nowadays Esperanto is only a lesser-used language the reason is not in the inner traits of the language, rather in geopolitical decisions. I argue that in the most probable global scenario English still plays the actual major role, but along with other cultural languages being regional lingua francas.
topic linguistic justice
esperanto
political neutrality
cultural languages
regional lingua francas
url https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT gobbofederico linguisticjusticevanparijsandesperanto
_version_ 1717768843634409472