Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration

Humans continuously receive and integrate information from several sensory modalities. However, attentional resources limit the amount of information that can be processed. It is not yet clear how attentional resources and multisensory processing are interrelated. Specifically, the following questio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basil eWahn, Peter eKönig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084/full
id doaj-ca36843197ed47aaad971a233b69e14b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca36843197ed47aaad971a233b69e14b2020-11-24T21:07:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-07-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084155682Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integrationBasil eWahn0Peter eKönig1Peter eKönig2University of OsnabrückUniversity of OsnabrückUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfHumans continuously receive and integrate information from several sensory modalities. However, attentional resources limit the amount of information that can be processed. It is not yet clear how attentional resources and multisensory processing are interrelated. Specifically, the following questions arise: 1) Are there distinct spatial attentional resources for each sensory modality? and 2) Does attentional load affect multisensory integration? We investigated these questions using a dual task paradigm: Participants performed two spatial tasks (a multiple object tracking task and a localization task), either separately (single task condition) or simultaneously (dual task condition). In the multiple object tracking task, participants visually tracked a small subset of several randomly moving objects. In the localization task, participants received either visual, auditory, or redundant visual and auditory location cues. In the dual task condition, we found a substantial decrease in participants’ performance relative to the results of the single task condition. Importantly, participants performed equally well in the dual task condition regardless of the location cues’ modality. This result suggests that having spatial information coming from different modalities does not facilitate performance, thereby indicating shared spatial attentional resources for the auditory and visual modality. Furthermore, we found that participants integrated redundant multisensory information similarly even when they experienced additional attentional load in the dual task condition. Overall, findings suggest that 1) visual andauditory spatial attentional resources are shared and that 2) audiovisual integration of spatial information occurs in an pre-attentive processing stage.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084/fullVisionauditionmultiple object trackingmultisensory integrationattentional resourcesAttentional load
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Basil eWahn
Peter eKönig
Peter eKönig
spellingShingle Basil eWahn
Peter eKönig
Peter eKönig
Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
Frontiers in Psychology
Vision
audition
multiple object tracking
multisensory integration
attentional resources
Attentional load
author_facet Basil eWahn
Peter eKönig
Peter eKönig
author_sort Basil eWahn
title Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_short Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_full Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_fullStr Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_full_unstemmed Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
title_sort audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Humans continuously receive and integrate information from several sensory modalities. However, attentional resources limit the amount of information that can be processed. It is not yet clear how attentional resources and multisensory processing are interrelated. Specifically, the following questions arise: 1) Are there distinct spatial attentional resources for each sensory modality? and 2) Does attentional load affect multisensory integration? We investigated these questions using a dual task paradigm: Participants performed two spatial tasks (a multiple object tracking task and a localization task), either separately (single task condition) or simultaneously (dual task condition). In the multiple object tracking task, participants visually tracked a small subset of several randomly moving objects. In the localization task, participants received either visual, auditory, or redundant visual and auditory location cues. In the dual task condition, we found a substantial decrease in participants’ performance relative to the results of the single task condition. Importantly, participants performed equally well in the dual task condition regardless of the location cues’ modality. This result suggests that having spatial information coming from different modalities does not facilitate performance, thereby indicating shared spatial attentional resources for the auditory and visual modality. Furthermore, we found that participants integrated redundant multisensory information similarly even when they experienced additional attentional load in the dual task condition. Overall, findings suggest that 1) visual andauditory spatial attentional resources are shared and that 2) audiovisual integration of spatial information occurs in an pre-attentive processing stage.
topic Vision
audition
multiple object tracking
multisensory integration
attentional resources
Attentional load
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01084/full
work_keys_str_mv AT basilewahn auditionandvisionsharespatialattentionalresourcesyetattentionalloaddoesnotdisruptaudiovisualintegration
AT peterekonig auditionandvisionsharespatialattentionalresourcesyetattentionalloaddoesnotdisruptaudiovisualintegration
AT peterekonig auditionandvisionsharespatialattentionalresourcesyetattentionalloaddoesnotdisruptaudiovisualintegration
_version_ 1716763498976903168