A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques

Abstract In this phase I, single‐center, open‐label study of ten heathy adults (18‐45 years; NCT02647697), the PK, safety, and tolerability profile of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults were assessed, as well as two PK microsampling techniques. All participants received a single 30 mg radi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Sciberras, Christian Otoul, Françoise Lurquin, John Smeraglia, Aurélia Lappert, Steven De Bruyn, Jan Jaap van Lier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-02-01
Series:Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.459
id doaj-ca51acea655646f4a6c7dca2f1ec5120
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca51acea655646f4a6c7dca2f1ec51202021-05-02T08:03:37ZengWileyPharmacology Research & Perspectives2052-17072019-02-0171n/an/a10.1002/prp2.459A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniquesDavid Sciberras0Christian Otoul1Françoise Lurquin2John Smeraglia3Aurélia Lappert4Steven De Bruyn5Jan Jaap van Lier6UCB Biopharma SPRL Braine l'Alleud BelgiumUCB Biopharma SPRL Braine l'Alleud BelgiumUCB Biopharma SPRL Braine l'Alleud BelgiumUCB Biopharma SPRL Braine l'Alleud BelgiumUCB Biopharma SPRL Braine l'Alleud BelgiumUCB Biopharma SPRL Braine l'Alleud BelgiumPRA Health Sciences – Early Development Services (PRA‐EDS) Groningen The NetherlandsAbstract In this phase I, single‐center, open‐label study of ten heathy adults (18‐45 years; NCT02647697), the PK, safety, and tolerability profile of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults were assessed, as well as two PK microsampling techniques. All participants received a single 30 mg radiprodil dose (12 mL oral suspension). Blood was collected at various time points using conventional venous sampling (intravenous catheter or venepuncture), and Mitra™ and Aqua‐Cap™ Drummond microsampling (finger‐prick and blood taken from venous blood sample tubes). Geometric mean radiprodil plasma concentrations from conventional venous samples were above the lower limit of quantification up to 48 hours after administration of a single oral dose of radiprodil. Geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax were 2042 h ng mL−1 and 89.4 ng mL−1, respectively. Geometric mean t½ was 15.8 hour; median tmax was 4 hour (range: 3‐6 hour). Radiprodil exposure variables for Aqua‐Cap™ Drummond sampling were similar to the conventional venous‐derived data. Conversely, radiprodil exposure variables were lower with Mitra™ sampling compared with conventional venous sampling. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for Cmax of conventional venous versus Mitra™ and Aqua‐Cap™ Drummond sampling (finger‐prick blood) was 0.89 (0.85, 0.94) and 1.03 (0.97,1.08), respectively, and therefore within the conventional bioequivalence range (0.80‐1.25). Radiprodil oral suspension had an acceptable safety, tolerability, and palatability profile. The PK profile of radiprodil oral suspension was established in healthy adults, and was comparable when analyzed using conventional versus microsampling techniques. These results will support future radiprodil paediatric studies.https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.459bioequivalencedrug safetypharmacokineticsphase 1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Sciberras
Christian Otoul
Françoise Lurquin
John Smeraglia
Aurélia Lappert
Steven De Bruyn
Jan Jaap van Lier
spellingShingle David Sciberras
Christian Otoul
Françoise Lurquin
John Smeraglia
Aurélia Lappert
Steven De Bruyn
Jan Jaap van Lier
A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
bioequivalence
drug safety
pharmacokinetics
phase 1
author_facet David Sciberras
Christian Otoul
Françoise Lurquin
John Smeraglia
Aurélia Lappert
Steven De Bruyn
Jan Jaap van Lier
author_sort David Sciberras
title A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
title_short A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
title_full A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
title_fullStr A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
title_full_unstemmed A pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
title_sort pharmacokinetic study of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults comparing conventional venous blood sampling with two microsampling techniques
publisher Wiley
series Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
issn 2052-1707
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract In this phase I, single‐center, open‐label study of ten heathy adults (18‐45 years; NCT02647697), the PK, safety, and tolerability profile of radiprodil oral suspension in healthy adults were assessed, as well as two PK microsampling techniques. All participants received a single 30 mg radiprodil dose (12 mL oral suspension). Blood was collected at various time points using conventional venous sampling (intravenous catheter or venepuncture), and Mitra™ and Aqua‐Cap™ Drummond microsampling (finger‐prick and blood taken from venous blood sample tubes). Geometric mean radiprodil plasma concentrations from conventional venous samples were above the lower limit of quantification up to 48 hours after administration of a single oral dose of radiprodil. Geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax were 2042 h ng mL−1 and 89.4 ng mL−1, respectively. Geometric mean t½ was 15.8 hour; median tmax was 4 hour (range: 3‐6 hour). Radiprodil exposure variables for Aqua‐Cap™ Drummond sampling were similar to the conventional venous‐derived data. Conversely, radiprodil exposure variables were lower with Mitra™ sampling compared with conventional venous sampling. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for Cmax of conventional venous versus Mitra™ and Aqua‐Cap™ Drummond sampling (finger‐prick blood) was 0.89 (0.85, 0.94) and 1.03 (0.97,1.08), respectively, and therefore within the conventional bioequivalence range (0.80‐1.25). Radiprodil oral suspension had an acceptable safety, tolerability, and palatability profile. The PK profile of radiprodil oral suspension was established in healthy adults, and was comparable when analyzed using conventional versus microsampling techniques. These results will support future radiprodil paediatric studies.
topic bioequivalence
drug safety
pharmacokinetics
phase 1
url https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.459
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsciberras apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT christianotoul apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT francoiselurquin apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT johnsmeraglia apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT aurelialappert apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT stevendebruyn apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT janjaapvanlier apharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT davidsciberras pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT christianotoul pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT francoiselurquin pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT johnsmeraglia pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT aurelialappert pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT stevendebruyn pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
AT janjaapvanlier pharmacokineticstudyofradiprodiloralsuspensioninhealthyadultscomparingconventionalvenousbloodsamplingwithtwomicrosamplingtechniques
_version_ 1721493897441443840