Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning

Few-shot learning are methods and scenarios learned from a small amount of labeled data. While recent meta-metric learning methods have made significant progress, there are still questions about what is the key point of these methods and how they work. To address these problems, in this paper, we ev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sai Yang, Fan Liu, Ning Dong, Jiaying Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9139379/
id doaj-ca5752686d0343aea9731217e25afccf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca5752686d0343aea9731217e25afccf2021-03-30T02:08:41ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01812706512707310.1109/ACCESS.2020.30086849139379Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot LearningSai Yang0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-7306Fan Liu1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8746-9845Ning Dong2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-9798Jiaying Wu3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-4295School of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, ChinaCollege of Computer and Information, Hohai University, Nanjing, ChinaGraduate School of ISEE, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of IPS, Waseda University, Fukuoka, JapanFew-shot learning are methods and scenarios learned from a small amount of labeled data. While recent meta-metric learning methods have made significant progress, there are still questions about what is the key point of these methods and how they work. To address these problems, in this paper, we evaluate the effects of different parts in classical models. To be specific, we 1) use four typical networks AlexNet, VGG16, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50 to replace the original feature extraction part in the Matching Network, Prototypical Network, and Relation Network, and compare the best results with 17 state-of-the-art meta-metric learning algorithms. 2) fix the feature extraction part of the Matching Network, Prototypical Network and Relation Network, and change the similarity measurement part of each into L1, L2, Cosine. 3) conduct above three models on datasets of different granularity. The experimental results show that for all models evaluated, the addition of non-pretrained networks will make the classification results worse, which shows that it is easy to overfit when using deep networks for few-shot learning. Changes in similarity measurement methods have a significant impact on results, which shows the importance to choose a suitable measurement. Moreover, there are differences in performance on different granularity datasets.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9139379/Few-shotmeta-metric learningfeature extractionsimilarity measurementcomparative analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sai Yang
Fan Liu
Ning Dong
Jiaying Wu
spellingShingle Sai Yang
Fan Liu
Ning Dong
Jiaying Wu
Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning
IEEE Access
Few-shot
meta-metric learning
feature extraction
similarity measurement
comparative analysis
author_facet Sai Yang
Fan Liu
Ning Dong
Jiaying Wu
author_sort Sai Yang
title Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning
title_short Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning
title_full Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis on Classical Meta-Metric Models for Few-Shot Learning
title_sort comparative analysis on classical meta-metric models for few-shot learning
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Few-shot learning are methods and scenarios learned from a small amount of labeled data. While recent meta-metric learning methods have made significant progress, there are still questions about what is the key point of these methods and how they work. To address these problems, in this paper, we evaluate the effects of different parts in classical models. To be specific, we 1) use four typical networks AlexNet, VGG16, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50 to replace the original feature extraction part in the Matching Network, Prototypical Network, and Relation Network, and compare the best results with 17 state-of-the-art meta-metric learning algorithms. 2) fix the feature extraction part of the Matching Network, Prototypical Network and Relation Network, and change the similarity measurement part of each into L1, L2, Cosine. 3) conduct above three models on datasets of different granularity. The experimental results show that for all models evaluated, the addition of non-pretrained networks will make the classification results worse, which shows that it is easy to overfit when using deep networks for few-shot learning. Changes in similarity measurement methods have a significant impact on results, which shows the importance to choose a suitable measurement. Moreover, there are differences in performance on different granularity datasets.
topic Few-shot
meta-metric learning
feature extraction
similarity measurement
comparative analysis
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9139379/
work_keys_str_mv AT saiyang comparativeanalysisonclassicalmetametricmodelsforfewshotlearning
AT fanliu comparativeanalysisonclassicalmetametricmodelsforfewshotlearning
AT ningdong comparativeanalysisonclassicalmetametricmodelsforfewshotlearning
AT jiayingwu comparativeanalysisonclassicalmetametricmodelsforfewshotlearning
_version_ 1724185783013736448