The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited

The author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of informal fallacies. While informal, the results provide presumptive evidence that those committing informal fallacies may tacitly reason as predicted by CRM. Davis has argued persuasively that Gricea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel N. Boone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2002-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577
id doaj-ca86e92160a4455388dd8a930740d556
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca86e92160a4455388dd8a930740d5562020-11-25T02:27:47ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2002-01-0122210.22329/il.v22i2.2577The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies RevisitedDaniel N. BooneThe author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of informal fallacies. While informal, the results provide presumptive evidence that those committing informal fallacies may tacitly reason as predicted by CRM. Davis has argued persuasively that Gricean theory has not lived up to expectations, In light of his critique, the CRM analyses of Begging the Question and Equivocation are amended. Johnson has provided standards for judging any theory of informal fallacies. It is argued that CRM survives the Standard Critique and sufficiently meets Johnson's other criteria.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577cogent reasoning model of informal fallaciesReasoning Analysis Testad baculumWayne A. DavisGricebegging the question fallacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel N. Boone
spellingShingle Daniel N. Boone
The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
Informal Logic
cogent reasoning model of informal fallacies
Reasoning Analysis Test
ad baculum
Wayne A. Davis
Grice
begging the question fallacy
author_facet Daniel N. Boone
author_sort Daniel N. Boone
title The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
title_short The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
title_full The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
title_fullStr The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
title_full_unstemmed The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies Revisited
title_sort cogent reasoning model of informal fallacies revisited
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2002-01-01
description The author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of informal fallacies. While informal, the results provide presumptive evidence that those committing informal fallacies may tacitly reason as predicted by CRM. Davis has argued persuasively that Gricean theory has not lived up to expectations, In light of his critique, the CRM analyses of Begging the Question and Equivocation are amended. Johnson has provided standards for judging any theory of informal fallacies. It is argued that CRM survives the Standard Critique and sufficiently meets Johnson's other criteria.
topic cogent reasoning model of informal fallacies
Reasoning Analysis Test
ad baculum
Wayne A. Davis
Grice
begging the question fallacy
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2577
work_keys_str_mv AT danielnboone thecogentreasoningmodelofinformalfallaciesrevisited
AT danielnboone cogentreasoningmodelofinformalfallaciesrevisited
_version_ 1724840894857740288