A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
<h4>Background</h4>Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) can often be diagnosed based solely on symptoms and should be treated with a short course of narrow spectrum antibiotics. However, clinicians often order urine analyses and prescribe long courses of broad spectrum antibioti...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238453 |
id |
doaj-caa0a996abcd42d6aabd51be2e4de3f9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-caa0a996abcd42d6aabd51be2e4de3f92021-03-04T13:10:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023845310.1371/journal.pone.0238453A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.Mark PinkertonJahnavi BonguAimee JamesJerry LowderMichael Durkin<h4>Background</h4>Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) can often be diagnosed based solely on symptoms and should be treated with a short course of narrow spectrum antibiotics. However, clinicians often order urine analyses and prescribe long courses of broad spectrum antibiotics.<h4>Objective</h4>The objectives of our study are: 1) Understand how primary care providers and residents clinically approach UTIs and 2) to understand specific opportunities, based on provider type, to target future antibiotic stewardship interventions.<h4>Design and participants</h4>We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews of community primary care providers (n = 15) and internal medicine residents (n = 15) in St. Louis, Missouri from 2018-2019. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate participant preferences for possible interventions. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and coded by two independent researchers using a combination inductive and deductive approach.<h4>Key results</h4>Several common themes emerged. Both providers and residents ordered urine tests to "confirm" presence of urinary tract infections. Antibiotic prescription decisions were often based on historical practice and anecdotal experience rather than local susceptibility data or clinical practice guidelines. Community providers were more comfortable treating patients over the phone than residents and tended to prescribe longer courses of antibiotics. Both community providers and residents voiced frustrations with guidelines being difficult to easily incorporate due to length and extraneous information. Preferences for receiving and incorporating guidelines into practice varied. Both groups felt benchmarking would improve prescribing practices but had reservations about implementation. Community providers preferred pragmatic clinical decision support systems and nurse triage algorithms. Residents preferred order sets.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Significant opportunities exist to optimize urinary tract infection management among residents and community providers. Multifaceted interventions that include provider education, synthesis of guidelines, and pragmatic clinical decision support systems are needed to improve antibiotic prescribing and diagnostic testing; optimal interventions to improve UTI management may vary based on provider training level.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238453 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark Pinkerton Jahnavi Bongu Aimee James Jerry Lowder Michael Durkin |
spellingShingle |
Mark Pinkerton Jahnavi Bongu Aimee James Jerry Lowder Michael Durkin A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Mark Pinkerton Jahnavi Bongu Aimee James Jerry Lowder Michael Durkin |
author_sort |
Mark Pinkerton |
title |
A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. |
title_short |
A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. |
title_full |
A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. |
title_fullStr |
A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. |
title_sort |
qualitative analysis of diagnostic testing, antibiotic selection, and quality improvement interventions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) can often be diagnosed based solely on symptoms and should be treated with a short course of narrow spectrum antibiotics. However, clinicians often order urine analyses and prescribe long courses of broad spectrum antibiotics.<h4>Objective</h4>The objectives of our study are: 1) Understand how primary care providers and residents clinically approach UTIs and 2) to understand specific opportunities, based on provider type, to target future antibiotic stewardship interventions.<h4>Design and participants</h4>We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews of community primary care providers (n = 15) and internal medicine residents (n = 15) in St. Louis, Missouri from 2018-2019. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate participant preferences for possible interventions. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and coded by two independent researchers using a combination inductive and deductive approach.<h4>Key results</h4>Several common themes emerged. Both providers and residents ordered urine tests to "confirm" presence of urinary tract infections. Antibiotic prescription decisions were often based on historical practice and anecdotal experience rather than local susceptibility data or clinical practice guidelines. Community providers were more comfortable treating patients over the phone than residents and tended to prescribe longer courses of antibiotics. Both community providers and residents voiced frustrations with guidelines being difficult to easily incorporate due to length and extraneous information. Preferences for receiving and incorporating guidelines into practice varied. Both groups felt benchmarking would improve prescribing practices but had reservations about implementation. Community providers preferred pragmatic clinical decision support systems and nurse triage algorithms. Residents preferred order sets.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Significant opportunities exist to optimize urinary tract infection management among residents and community providers. Multifaceted interventions that include provider education, synthesis of guidelines, and pragmatic clinical decision support systems are needed to improve antibiotic prescribing and diagnostic testing; optimal interventions to improve UTI management may vary based on provider training level. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238453 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markpinkerton aqualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT jahnavibongu aqualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT aimeejames aqualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT jerrylowder aqualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT michaeldurkin aqualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT markpinkerton qualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT jahnavibongu qualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT aimeejames qualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT jerrylowder qualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections AT michaeldurkin qualitativeanalysisofdiagnostictestingantibioticselectionandqualityimprovementinterventionsforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfections |
_version_ |
1714800528179855360 |