Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck

Introduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sati Akbaba, Andreas Mock, Juliane Hoerner-Rieber, Thomas Held, Sonja Katayama, Tobias Forster, Christian Freudlsperger, Stefan Rieken, Klaus Herfarth, Peter Plinkert, Juergen Debus, Sebastian Adeberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00755/full
id doaj-cac036457117466aa9e324b01eaf9ba4
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Andreas Mock
Andreas Mock
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Christian Freudlsperger
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Peter Plinkert
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
spellingShingle Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Andreas Mock
Andreas Mock
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Christian Freudlsperger
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Peter Plinkert
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
Frontiers in Oncology
salivary gland adenocarcinoma
salivary duct adenocarcinoma
intestinal-type adenocarcinoma
carbon ion radiotherapy
tomotherapy
local control
author_facet Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Sati Akbaba
Andreas Mock
Andreas Mock
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Thomas Held
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Sonja Katayama
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Tobias Forster
Christian Freudlsperger
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Stefan Rieken
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Klaus Herfarth
Peter Plinkert
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Juergen Debus
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
Sebastian Adeberg
author_sort Sati Akbaba
title Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
title_short Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
title_full Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
title_fullStr Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
title_sort treatment outcome of a combined dose-escalated treatment regime with helical tomotherapy® and active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for adenocarcinomas of the head and neck
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Introduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost on local control (LC) and survival in adenocarcinoma patients for a large patient collective.Materials and Methods: Patient records of eighty consecutive patients treated between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and Kaplan-Meier estimates for LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients with salivary gland adenocarcinoma (SGAC), salivary duct adenocarcinoma (SDAC), and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and cox-regression modeling. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).Results: Median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year and estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier rates for all patients were 83 and 75% for LC, 74 and 50% for OS and 60 and 53% for PFS, respectively. While bimodal RT for ITAC resulted in a significantly decreased 3-year LC rate of 50 vs. 93% for each SGAC and SDAC (p < 0.01), no statistical significant survival differences could be identified across the three groups regarding OS (p = 0.08) and PFS (p = 0.063). 3-year OS was 88% for SGAC, 78% for SDAC and 67% for ITAC and 3-year PFS was 72% for SGAC, 53% for SDAC and 44% for ITAC, respectively. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis, OS for ITAC was significantly worse compared to SGAC (p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, bilateral tumor side (vs. unilateral) solely could be identified as independent negative prognostic factor for LC (p < 0.01). Treatment was well-tolerated with 21% acute (n = 17) and 25% (n = 20) late grade ≥3 toxicities.Conclusion: Radiotherapy including active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for relatively radio resistant adenocarcinomas of the head and neck resulted in favorable survival outcome for salivary gland and salivary duct adenocarcinomas with moderate toxicity. However, local control and prognosis for bilateral intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) seem to remain low even after dose-escalation.
topic salivary gland adenocarcinoma
salivary duct adenocarcinoma
intestinal-type adenocarcinoma
carbon ion radiotherapy
tomotherapy
local control
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00755/full
work_keys_str_mv AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT andreasmock treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT andreasmock treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT christianfreudlsperger treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT peterplinkert treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck
_version_ 1725987746617491456
spelling doaj-cac036457117466aa9e324b01eaf9ba42020-11-24T21:24:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2019-08-01910.3389/fonc.2019.00755461139Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and NeckSati Akbaba0Sati Akbaba1Sati Akbaba2Sati Akbaba3Andreas Mock4Andreas Mock5Juliane Hoerner-Rieber6Juliane Hoerner-Rieber7Juliane Hoerner-Rieber8Juliane Hoerner-Rieber9Juliane Hoerner-Rieber10Thomas Held11Thomas Held12Thomas Held13Thomas Held14Sonja Katayama15Sonja Katayama16Sonja Katayama17Sonja Katayama18Tobias Forster19Tobias Forster20Tobias Forster21Tobias Forster22Christian Freudlsperger23Stefan Rieken24Stefan Rieken25Stefan Rieken26Stefan Rieken27Klaus Herfarth28Klaus Herfarth29Klaus Herfarth30Klaus Herfarth31Klaus Herfarth32Peter Plinkert33Juergen Debus34Juergen Debus35Juergen Debus36Juergen Debus37Juergen Debus38Sebastian Adeberg39Sebastian Adeberg40Sebastian Adeberg41Sebastian Adeberg42Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyClinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyIntroduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost on local control (LC) and survival in adenocarcinoma patients for a large patient collective.Materials and Methods: Patient records of eighty consecutive patients treated between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and Kaplan-Meier estimates for LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients with salivary gland adenocarcinoma (SGAC), salivary duct adenocarcinoma (SDAC), and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and cox-regression modeling. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).Results: Median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year and estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier rates for all patients were 83 and 75% for LC, 74 and 50% for OS and 60 and 53% for PFS, respectively. While bimodal RT for ITAC resulted in a significantly decreased 3-year LC rate of 50 vs. 93% for each SGAC and SDAC (p < 0.01), no statistical significant survival differences could be identified across the three groups regarding OS (p = 0.08) and PFS (p = 0.063). 3-year OS was 88% for SGAC, 78% for SDAC and 67% for ITAC and 3-year PFS was 72% for SGAC, 53% for SDAC and 44% for ITAC, respectively. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis, OS for ITAC was significantly worse compared to SGAC (p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, bilateral tumor side (vs. unilateral) solely could be identified as independent negative prognostic factor for LC (p < 0.01). Treatment was well-tolerated with 21% acute (n = 17) and 25% (n = 20) late grade ≥3 toxicities.Conclusion: Radiotherapy including active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for relatively radio resistant adenocarcinomas of the head and neck resulted in favorable survival outcome for salivary gland and salivary duct adenocarcinomas with moderate toxicity. However, local control and prognosis for bilateral intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) seem to remain low even after dose-escalation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00755/fullsalivary gland adenocarcinomasalivary duct adenocarcinomaintestinal-type adenocarcinomacarbon ion radiotherapytomotherapylocal control