Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck
Introduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with i...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00755/full |
id |
doaj-cac036457117466aa9e324b01eaf9ba4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Andreas Mock Andreas Mock Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Thomas Held Thomas Held Thomas Held Thomas Held Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Christian Freudlsperger Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Peter Plinkert Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg |
spellingShingle |
Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Andreas Mock Andreas Mock Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Thomas Held Thomas Held Thomas Held Thomas Held Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Christian Freudlsperger Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Peter Plinkert Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck Frontiers in Oncology salivary gland adenocarcinoma salivary duct adenocarcinoma intestinal-type adenocarcinoma carbon ion radiotherapy tomotherapy local control |
author_facet |
Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Sati Akbaba Andreas Mock Andreas Mock Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Juliane Hoerner-Rieber Thomas Held Thomas Held Thomas Held Thomas Held Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Sonja Katayama Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Tobias Forster Christian Freudlsperger Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Stefan Rieken Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Klaus Herfarth Peter Plinkert Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Juergen Debus Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg Sebastian Adeberg |
author_sort |
Sati Akbaba |
title |
Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck |
title_short |
Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck |
title_full |
Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck |
title_fullStr |
Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck |
title_full_unstemmed |
Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck |
title_sort |
treatment outcome of a combined dose-escalated treatment regime with helical tomotherapy® and active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for adenocarcinomas of the head and neck |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Introduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost on local control (LC) and survival in adenocarcinoma patients for a large patient collective.Materials and Methods: Patient records of eighty consecutive patients treated between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and Kaplan-Meier estimates for LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients with salivary gland adenocarcinoma (SGAC), salivary duct adenocarcinoma (SDAC), and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and cox-regression modeling. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).Results: Median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year and estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier rates for all patients were 83 and 75% for LC, 74 and 50% for OS and 60 and 53% for PFS, respectively. While bimodal RT for ITAC resulted in a significantly decreased 3-year LC rate of 50 vs. 93% for each SGAC and SDAC (p < 0.01), no statistical significant survival differences could be identified across the three groups regarding OS (p = 0.08) and PFS (p = 0.063). 3-year OS was 88% for SGAC, 78% for SDAC and 67% for ITAC and 3-year PFS was 72% for SGAC, 53% for SDAC and 44% for ITAC, respectively. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis, OS for ITAC was significantly worse compared to SGAC (p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, bilateral tumor side (vs. unilateral) solely could be identified as independent negative prognostic factor for LC (p < 0.01). Treatment was well-tolerated with 21% acute (n = 17) and 25% (n = 20) late grade ≥3 toxicities.Conclusion: Radiotherapy including active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for relatively radio resistant adenocarcinomas of the head and neck resulted in favorable survival outcome for salivary gland and salivary duct adenocarcinomas with moderate toxicity. However, local control and prognosis for bilateral intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) seem to remain low even after dose-escalation. |
topic |
salivary gland adenocarcinoma salivary duct adenocarcinoma intestinal-type adenocarcinoma carbon ion radiotherapy tomotherapy local control |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00755/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT satiakbaba treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT andreasmock treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT andreasmock treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT julianehoernerrieber treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT thomasheld treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sonjakatayama treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT tobiasforster treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT christianfreudlsperger treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT stefanrieken treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT klausherfarth treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT peterplinkert treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT juergendebus treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck AT sebastianadeberg treatmentoutcomeofacombineddoseescalatedtreatmentregimewithhelicaltomotherapyandactiverasterscanningcarbonionboostforadenocarcinomasoftheheadandneck |
_version_ |
1725987746617491456 |
spelling |
doaj-cac036457117466aa9e324b01eaf9ba42020-11-24T21:24:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2019-08-01910.3389/fonc.2019.00755461139Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and NeckSati Akbaba0Sati Akbaba1Sati Akbaba2Sati Akbaba3Andreas Mock4Andreas Mock5Juliane Hoerner-Rieber6Juliane Hoerner-Rieber7Juliane Hoerner-Rieber8Juliane Hoerner-Rieber9Juliane Hoerner-Rieber10Thomas Held11Thomas Held12Thomas Held13Thomas Held14Sonja Katayama15Sonja Katayama16Sonja Katayama17Sonja Katayama18Tobias Forster19Tobias Forster20Tobias Forster21Tobias Forster22Christian Freudlsperger23Stefan Rieken24Stefan Rieken25Stefan Rieken26Stefan Rieken27Klaus Herfarth28Klaus Herfarth29Klaus Herfarth30Klaus Herfarth31Klaus Herfarth32Peter Plinkert33Juergen Debus34Juergen Debus35Juergen Debus36Juergen Debus37Juergen Debus38Sebastian Adeberg39Sebastian Adeberg40Sebastian Adeberg41Sebastian Adeberg42Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyClinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, GermanyNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, GermanyHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, GermanyIntroduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost on local control (LC) and survival in adenocarcinoma patients for a large patient collective.Materials and Methods: Patient records of eighty consecutive patients treated between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and Kaplan-Meier estimates for LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients with salivary gland adenocarcinoma (SGAC), salivary duct adenocarcinoma (SDAC), and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and cox-regression modeling. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).Results: Median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year and estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier rates for all patients were 83 and 75% for LC, 74 and 50% for OS and 60 and 53% for PFS, respectively. While bimodal RT for ITAC resulted in a significantly decreased 3-year LC rate of 50 vs. 93% for each SGAC and SDAC (p < 0.01), no statistical significant survival differences could be identified across the three groups regarding OS (p = 0.08) and PFS (p = 0.063). 3-year OS was 88% for SGAC, 78% for SDAC and 67% for ITAC and 3-year PFS was 72% for SGAC, 53% for SDAC and 44% for ITAC, respectively. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis, OS for ITAC was significantly worse compared to SGAC (p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, bilateral tumor side (vs. unilateral) solely could be identified as independent negative prognostic factor for LC (p < 0.01). Treatment was well-tolerated with 21% acute (n = 17) and 25% (n = 20) late grade ≥3 toxicities.Conclusion: Radiotherapy including active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for relatively radio resistant adenocarcinomas of the head and neck resulted in favorable survival outcome for salivary gland and salivary duct adenocarcinomas with moderate toxicity. However, local control and prognosis for bilateral intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) seem to remain low even after dose-escalation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00755/fullsalivary gland adenocarcinomasalivary duct adenocarcinomaintestinal-type adenocarcinomacarbon ion radiotherapytomotherapylocal control |