Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks

Although there is a broad agreement on the importance of scientific knowledge for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, high levels of uncertainty and debate about what counts as knowledge challenge the use of research for political decision-making. Hence, the question arises, whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ulrike Zeigermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-02-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
sdg
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3630
id doaj-cb0ecf90a0d748c383f675b2ff105dc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb0ecf90a0d748c383f675b2ff105dc32021-02-26T11:25:11ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632021-02-019116417510.17645/pag.v9i1.36301863Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability NetworksUlrike Zeigermann0Department for Political Science, University of Magdeburg, GermanyAlthough there is a broad agreement on the importance of scientific knowledge for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, high levels of uncertainty and debate about what counts as knowledge challenge the use of research for political decision-making. Hence, the question arises, which strategies of scientific knowledge integration are adopted by science-based actor-networks that seek to enhance evidence in sustainability governance. In this article, I study the Sustainable Development Solution Network (SDSN) engaged in different institutional settings and policy fields. With a qualitative document analysis, I compare the overall structure, objectives, thematic focus, formal knowledge processes, and outputs of 22 national sub-networks of the global SDSN in order to elucidate how these initiatives integrate contested sustainability knowledge underpinning the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. My findings suggest that most SDSNs adopt solution-oriented knowledge integration strategies but also that networks in countries with better overall SDG performance tend to adopt assessment-oriented and learning-oriented strategies. In reflecting on these results in the context of the current literature on knowledge integration in sustainability governance, I argue that science–policy interfaces are shaped by the intentional and dynamic interactions of actors within their institutional setting and policy environment, and propose pathways for further research.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3630expertiseglobal actor networksknowledge integrationknowledge networkssdgsustainable developmentsustainability governance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ulrike Zeigermann
spellingShingle Ulrike Zeigermann
Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks
Politics and Governance
expertise
global actor networks
knowledge integration
knowledge networks
sdg
sustainable development
sustainability governance
author_facet Ulrike Zeigermann
author_sort Ulrike Zeigermann
title Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks
title_short Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks
title_full Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks
title_fullStr Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Knowledge Integration and the Implementation of the SDGs: Comparing Strategies of Sustainability Networks
title_sort scientific knowledge integration and the implementation of the sdgs: comparing strategies of sustainability networks
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Although there is a broad agreement on the importance of scientific knowledge for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, high levels of uncertainty and debate about what counts as knowledge challenge the use of research for political decision-making. Hence, the question arises, which strategies of scientific knowledge integration are adopted by science-based actor-networks that seek to enhance evidence in sustainability governance. In this article, I study the Sustainable Development Solution Network (SDSN) engaged in different institutional settings and policy fields. With a qualitative document analysis, I compare the overall structure, objectives, thematic focus, formal knowledge processes, and outputs of 22 national sub-networks of the global SDSN in order to elucidate how these initiatives integrate contested sustainability knowledge underpinning the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. My findings suggest that most SDSNs adopt solution-oriented knowledge integration strategies but also that networks in countries with better overall SDG performance tend to adopt assessment-oriented and learning-oriented strategies. In reflecting on these results in the context of the current literature on knowledge integration in sustainability governance, I argue that science–policy interfaces are shaped by the intentional and dynamic interactions of actors within their institutional setting and policy environment, and propose pathways for further research.
topic expertise
global actor networks
knowledge integration
knowledge networks
sdg
sustainable development
sustainability governance
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3630
work_keys_str_mv AT ulrikezeigermann scientificknowledgeintegrationandtheimplementationofthesdgscomparingstrategiesofsustainabilitynetworks
_version_ 1724249582499528704