Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States

The purpose of this research was to assess the existing variations in the residency training resources among radiation oncology (RO) residency programs in the United States. We queried each residency program website and Fellowship Residency Electronic Interactive Data Access System website (www.frei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD, Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD, Jenna Kahn, MD, Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH, Amy Q. Parr, BS, Ashley Albert, MD, Mudit Chowdhary, MD, Sushil Beriwal, MD, Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420302128
id doaj-cb538bac7b4e4b5f9718d65a50a7afb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb538bac7b4e4b5f9718d65a50a7afb92021-02-15T04:14:11ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942021-01-0161100544Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United StatesToms Vengaloor Thomas, MD0Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD1Jenna Kahn, MD2Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH3Amy Q. Parr, BS4Ashley Albert, MD5Mudit Chowdhary, MD6Sushil Beriwal, MD7Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD8University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi; Corresponding author: Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MDUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiOregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OregonUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IllinoisUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MississippiThe purpose of this research was to assess the existing variations in the residency training resources among radiation oncology (RO) residency programs in the United States. We queried each residency program website and Fellowship Residency Electronic Interactive Data Access System website (www.freida.ama-assn.org) to obtain information on faculty and available treatment modalities. The data were continuously updated, most recently as of April 30, 2019. A total of 94 RO residency programs were identified during the academic year 2018-2019, and data were collected. The median number of attending physicians was 13 (range, 4 -71). The median number of physicists and biologists were 9 and 3, respectively. The conventional techniques, including 3 dimensional conformal radation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, electron therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therap/stereotactic radiosurgery, were available in all residency programs. In terms of specialized external beam radiation therapy machines, gamma knife, CyberKnife, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) linear accelerator were available in 49 (52%), 21(22%), and 7 (8%) programs, respectively. Only 19 programs (20%) had in-house proton therapy availability; however, 37 programs (39%) offered proton therapy training via resident rotation at an affiliated institution. Prostate, gynecologic, and breast brachytherapy were available in 81 (86%), 82 (87%), and 58 (62%) programs, respectively. Eighty-one (86%) programs reported to have high dose rate, and only 20 (21%) programs had low dose rate brachytherapy. Our study found that marked variations exist among RO residency programs in the United States during academic year 2018-2019 and will serve as a baseline for future intervention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420302128
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD
Jenna Kahn, MD
Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH
Amy Q. Parr, BS
Ashley Albert, MD
Mudit Chowdhary, MD
Sushil Beriwal, MD
Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
spellingShingle Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD
Jenna Kahn, MD
Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH
Amy Q. Parr, BS
Ashley Albert, MD
Mudit Chowdhary, MD
Sushil Beriwal, MD
Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
Teessa Perekattu Kuruvilla, MD
Jenna Kahn, MD
Eldrin Bhanat, MD, MPH
Amy Q. Parr, BS
Ashley Albert, MD
Mudit Chowdhary, MD
Sushil Beriwal, MD
Srinivasan Vijayakumar, MD
author_sort Toms Vengaloor Thomas, MD
title Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_short Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_full Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_fullStr Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
title_sort variations in resources among radiation oncology residency programs in the united states
publisher Elsevier
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
issn 2452-1094
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The purpose of this research was to assess the existing variations in the residency training resources among radiation oncology (RO) residency programs in the United States. We queried each residency program website and Fellowship Residency Electronic Interactive Data Access System website (www.freida.ama-assn.org) to obtain information on faculty and available treatment modalities. The data were continuously updated, most recently as of April 30, 2019. A total of 94 RO residency programs were identified during the academic year 2018-2019, and data were collected. The median number of attending physicians was 13 (range, 4 -71). The median number of physicists and biologists were 9 and 3, respectively. The conventional techniques, including 3 dimensional conformal radation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, electron therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therap/stereotactic radiosurgery, were available in all residency programs. In terms of specialized external beam radiation therapy machines, gamma knife, CyberKnife, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) linear accelerator were available in 49 (52%), 21(22%), and 7 (8%) programs, respectively. Only 19 programs (20%) had in-house proton therapy availability; however, 37 programs (39%) offered proton therapy training via resident rotation at an affiliated institution. Prostate, gynecologic, and breast brachytherapy were available in 81 (86%), 82 (87%), and 58 (62%) programs, respectively. Eighty-one (86%) programs reported to have high dose rate, and only 20 (21%) programs had low dose rate brachytherapy. Our study found that marked variations exist among RO residency programs in the United States during academic year 2018-2019 and will serve as a baseline for future intervention.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420302128
work_keys_str_mv AT tomsvengaloorthomasmd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT teessaperekattukuruvillamd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT jennakahnmd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT eldrinbhanatmdmph variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT amyqparrbs variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT ashleyalbertmd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT muditchowdharymd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT sushilberiwalmd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
AT srinivasanvijayakumarmd variationsinresourcesamongradiationoncologyresidencyprogramsintheunitedstates
_version_ 1724269337956581376