Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation

Abstract Background The 2015–2020 strategic plan from the Office for Fair Access calls on institutions to provide contemporary assessments of the impact of their financial support for disadvantaged students on retention, progression, success, wellbeing and participation, throughout the student lifec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugh Claridge, Michael Ussher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1573-3
id doaj-cb6368f3be7b42b3aa074cddbbddb529
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb6368f3be7b42b3aa074cddbbddb5292020-11-25T03:23:26ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202019-05-011911810.1186/s12909-019-1573-3Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluationHugh Claridge0Michael Ussher1Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of LondonPopulation Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of LondonAbstract Background The 2015–2020 strategic plan from the Office for Fair Access calls on institutions to provide contemporary assessments of the impact of their financial support for disadvantaged students on retention, progression, success, wellbeing and participation, throughout the student lifecycle. In response to this call, this article describes the first evaluation the authors are aware of, of a financial support scheme for students from lower income backgrounds attending a medical school. Methods A qualitative study of a bursary scheme for undergraduate medical students was undertaken at a university in London, England. One-to-one, audio-recorded interviews were conducted, transcribed and thematically analysed in order to ascertain eight recipients’ experiences of receiving the bursary and its influence on their financial situation, academic studies and quality of life. Results The data were best explained by five main themes: impact of the bursary, communication, financial management, support preferences, and administration of the bursary. Conclusions The participants, who were in receipt of various bursary amounts, generally regarded it as a good scheme with it providing a financial buffer and enabling them to focus on their studies and extracurricular activities rather than seek paid employment during term time.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1573-3Financial supportBursaryUndergraduate medical studentUniversityQualitative research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hugh Claridge
Michael Ussher
spellingShingle Hugh Claridge
Michael Ussher
Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation
BMC Medical Education
Financial support
Bursary
Undergraduate medical student
University
Qualitative research
author_facet Hugh Claridge
Michael Ussher
author_sort Hugh Claridge
title Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation
title_short Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation
title_full Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation
title_fullStr Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? A qualitative evaluation
title_sort does financial support for medical students from low income families make a difference? a qualitative evaluation
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background The 2015–2020 strategic plan from the Office for Fair Access calls on institutions to provide contemporary assessments of the impact of their financial support for disadvantaged students on retention, progression, success, wellbeing and participation, throughout the student lifecycle. In response to this call, this article describes the first evaluation the authors are aware of, of a financial support scheme for students from lower income backgrounds attending a medical school. Methods A qualitative study of a bursary scheme for undergraduate medical students was undertaken at a university in London, England. One-to-one, audio-recorded interviews were conducted, transcribed and thematically analysed in order to ascertain eight recipients’ experiences of receiving the bursary and its influence on their financial situation, academic studies and quality of life. Results The data were best explained by five main themes: impact of the bursary, communication, financial management, support preferences, and administration of the bursary. Conclusions The participants, who were in receipt of various bursary amounts, generally regarded it as a good scheme with it providing a financial buffer and enabling them to focus on their studies and extracurricular activities rather than seek paid employment during term time.
topic Financial support
Bursary
Undergraduate medical student
University
Qualitative research
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1573-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hughclaridge doesfinancialsupportformedicalstudentsfromlowincomefamiliesmakeadifferenceaqualitativeevaluation
AT michaelussher doesfinancialsupportformedicalstudentsfromlowincomefamiliesmakeadifferenceaqualitativeevaluation
_version_ 1724606313266151424