Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.

In open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Soibam, Rachel L Goldfeder, Claire Manson-Bishop, Rachel Gamblin, Scott D Pletcher, Shishir Shah, Gemunu H Gunaratne, Gregg W Roman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3468593?pdf=render
id doaj-cbb524abaa8249d28e116f3ac8a904e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbb524abaa8249d28e116f3ac8a904e02020-11-25T01:24:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01710e4657010.1371/journal.pone.0046570Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.Benjamin SoibamRachel L GoldfederClaire Manson-BishopRachel GamblinScott D PletcherShishir ShahGemunu H GunaratneGregg W RomanIn open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are sufficient to drive positional preferences within open field arenas of different shapes and with different internal features. Our model has two components: directional persistence and local wall force. In regions far away from walls, the trajectory is entirely characterized by a directional persistence probability, P(r,θ), for each movement defined by the step size, r, and the turn angle, θ. In close proximity to walls, motion is computed from P(r,θ), and a local attractive force which depends on the distance between the fly and points on the walls. The directional persistence probability was obtained experimentally from trajectories of wild type Drosophila in a circular open field arena and the wall force was computed to minimize the difference between the radial distributions from the model and Drosophila in the same circular arena. The two-component model for fly movement was challenged by comparing the positional preferences from the two-component model to wild type Drosophila in a variety of open field arenas. In most arenas there was a strong concordance between the two-component model and Drosophila. In more complex arenas, the model exhibits similar trends, but some significant differences were found. These differences suggest that there are emergent features within these complex arenas that have significance for the fly, such as potential shelter. Hence, the two-component model is an important step in defining how Drosophila interact with their environment.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3468593?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Soibam
Rachel L Goldfeder
Claire Manson-Bishop
Rachel Gamblin
Scott D Pletcher
Shishir Shah
Gemunu H Gunaratne
Gregg W Roman
spellingShingle Benjamin Soibam
Rachel L Goldfeder
Claire Manson-Bishop
Rachel Gamblin
Scott D Pletcher
Shishir Shah
Gemunu H Gunaratne
Gregg W Roman
Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benjamin Soibam
Rachel L Goldfeder
Claire Manson-Bishop
Rachel Gamblin
Scott D Pletcher
Shishir Shah
Gemunu H Gunaratne
Gregg W Roman
author_sort Benjamin Soibam
title Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
title_short Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
title_full Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
title_fullStr Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
title_sort modeling drosophila positional preferences in open field arenas with directional persistence and wall attraction.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description In open field arenas, Drosophila adults exhibit a preference for arena boundaries over internal walls and open regions. Herein, we investigate the nature of this preference using phenomenological modeling of locomotion to determine whether local arena features and constraints on movement alone are sufficient to drive positional preferences within open field arenas of different shapes and with different internal features. Our model has two components: directional persistence and local wall force. In regions far away from walls, the trajectory is entirely characterized by a directional persistence probability, P(r,θ), for each movement defined by the step size, r, and the turn angle, θ. In close proximity to walls, motion is computed from P(r,θ), and a local attractive force which depends on the distance between the fly and points on the walls. The directional persistence probability was obtained experimentally from trajectories of wild type Drosophila in a circular open field arena and the wall force was computed to minimize the difference between the radial distributions from the model and Drosophila in the same circular arena. The two-component model for fly movement was challenged by comparing the positional preferences from the two-component model to wild type Drosophila in a variety of open field arenas. In most arenas there was a strong concordance between the two-component model and Drosophila. In more complex arenas, the model exhibits similar trends, but some significant differences were found. These differences suggest that there are emergent features within these complex arenas that have significance for the fly, such as potential shelter. Hence, the two-component model is an important step in defining how Drosophila interact with their environment.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3468593?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminsoibam modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT rachellgoldfeder modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT clairemansonbishop modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT rachelgamblin modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT scottdpletcher modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT shishirshah modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT gemunuhgunaratne modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
AT greggwroman modelingdrosophilapositionalpreferencesinopenfieldarenaswithdirectionalpersistenceandwallattraction
_version_ 1725118872641601536