Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.

Prognostic models are generally used to predict gastric cancer outcomes. However, no model combining patient-, tumor- and host-related factors has been established to predict outcomes after radical gastrectomy, especially outcomes of patients without nodal involvement. The aim of this study was to d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing-lei Qu, Xiu-juan Qu, Zhi Li, Jing-dong Zhang, Jing Liu, Yue-e Teng, Bo Jin, Ming-fang Zhao, Ping Yu, Jing Shi, Ling-Yu Fu, Zhen-ning Wang, Yun-peng Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4468084?pdf=render
id doaj-cbc2227c56b44d379cb9c2afffb487d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbc2227c56b44d379cb9c2afffb487d72020-11-24T22:07:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012854010.1371/journal.pone.0128540Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.Jing-lei QuXiu-juan QuZhi LiJing-dong ZhangJing LiuYue-e TengBo JinMing-fang ZhaoPing YuJing ShiLing-Yu FuZhen-ning WangYun-peng LiuPrognostic models are generally used to predict gastric cancer outcomes. However, no model combining patient-, tumor- and host-related factors has been established to predict outcomes after radical gastrectomy, especially outcomes of patients without nodal involvement. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model based on the systemic inflammatory response and clinicopathological factors of resectable gastric cancer and determine whether the model can improve prognostic accuracy in node-negative patients. We reviewed the clinical, laboratory, histopathological and survival data of 1397 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2007 and 2013. Patients were split into development and validation sets of 1123 and 274 patients, respectively. Among all 1397 patients, 545 had node-negative gastric cancer; 440 were included in the development set, 105 were included in the validation set. A prognostic model was constructed from the development set. The scoring system was based on hazard ratios in a Cox proportional hazard model. In the multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, Lauren type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and the neutrophil--lymphocyte ratio were independent prognostic indicators of overall survival. A prognostic model was then established based on the significant factors. Patients were categorized into five groups according to their scores. The 3-year survival rates for the low- to high-risk groups were 98.9%, 92.8%, 82.4%, 58.4%, and 36.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prognostic model clearly discriminated patients with stage pT1-4N0M0 tumor into four risk groups with significant differences in the 3-year survival rates (P < 0.001). Compared with the pathological T stage, the model improved the predictive accuracy of the 3-year survival rate by 5% for node-negative patients. The prognostic scores also stratified the patients with stage pT4aN0M0 tumor into significantly different risk groups (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the predictive value of this model was validated in an independent set of 274 patients. This model, which included the systemic inflammatory markers and clinicopathological factors, is more effective in predicting the prognosis of node-negative gastric cancer than traditional staging systems. Patients in the high-risk group might be good candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4468084?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing-lei Qu
Xiu-juan Qu
Zhi Li
Jing-dong Zhang
Jing Liu
Yue-e Teng
Bo Jin
Ming-fang Zhao
Ping Yu
Jing Shi
Ling-Yu Fu
Zhen-ning Wang
Yun-peng Liu
spellingShingle Jing-lei Qu
Xiu-juan Qu
Zhi Li
Jing-dong Zhang
Jing Liu
Yue-e Teng
Bo Jin
Ming-fang Zhao
Ping Yu
Jing Shi
Ling-Yu Fu
Zhen-ning Wang
Yun-peng Liu
Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jing-lei Qu
Xiu-juan Qu
Zhi Li
Jing-dong Zhang
Jing Liu
Yue-e Teng
Bo Jin
Ming-fang Zhao
Ping Yu
Jing Shi
Ling-Yu Fu
Zhen-ning Wang
Yun-peng Liu
author_sort Jing-lei Qu
title Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
title_short Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
title_full Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
title_fullStr Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
title_sort prognostic model based on systemic inflammatory response and clinicopathological factors to predict outcome of patients with node-negative gastric cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Prognostic models are generally used to predict gastric cancer outcomes. However, no model combining patient-, tumor- and host-related factors has been established to predict outcomes after radical gastrectomy, especially outcomes of patients without nodal involvement. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model based on the systemic inflammatory response and clinicopathological factors of resectable gastric cancer and determine whether the model can improve prognostic accuracy in node-negative patients. We reviewed the clinical, laboratory, histopathological and survival data of 1397 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2007 and 2013. Patients were split into development and validation sets of 1123 and 274 patients, respectively. Among all 1397 patients, 545 had node-negative gastric cancer; 440 were included in the development set, 105 were included in the validation set. A prognostic model was constructed from the development set. The scoring system was based on hazard ratios in a Cox proportional hazard model. In the multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, Lauren type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and the neutrophil--lymphocyte ratio were independent prognostic indicators of overall survival. A prognostic model was then established based on the significant factors. Patients were categorized into five groups according to their scores. The 3-year survival rates for the low- to high-risk groups were 98.9%, 92.8%, 82.4%, 58.4%, and 36.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prognostic model clearly discriminated patients with stage pT1-4N0M0 tumor into four risk groups with significant differences in the 3-year survival rates (P < 0.001). Compared with the pathological T stage, the model improved the predictive accuracy of the 3-year survival rate by 5% for node-negative patients. The prognostic scores also stratified the patients with stage pT4aN0M0 tumor into significantly different risk groups (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the predictive value of this model was validated in an independent set of 274 patients. This model, which included the systemic inflammatory markers and clinicopathological factors, is more effective in predicting the prognosis of node-negative gastric cancer than traditional staging systems. Patients in the high-risk group might be good candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4468084?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jingleiqu prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT xiujuanqu prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT zhili prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT jingdongzhang prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT jingliu prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT yueeteng prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT bojin prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT mingfangzhao prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT pingyu prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT jingshi prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT lingyufu prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT zhenningwang prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
AT yunpengliu prognosticmodelbasedonsystemicinflammatoryresponseandclinicopathologicalfactorstopredictoutcomeofpatientswithnodenegativegastriccancer
_version_ 1725818450056577024