REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts

Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark Pearson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pacific Media Centre 2005-09-01
Series:Pacific Journalism Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063
id doaj-cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb92020-11-25T03:27:57ZengPacific Media CentrePacific Journalism Review1023-94992324-20352005-09-0111210.24135/pjr.v11i2.1063REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics textsMark Pearson Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of Ethics' clause 4 which stipulates journalists should not allow 'personal interest or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit; to undermine their accuracy, fairness or independence..Hirst and Patching make much of an 'ethical fault line' metaphore throughout their text and refer to objectvity as 'one of the most volatile fault lines in the ideology of reports..." https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063journalism ethicsobjectivitymedia code of ethicsjournalism principlesethical faultsreviews
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Pearson
spellingShingle Mark Pearson
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
Pacific Journalism Review
journalism ethics
objectivity
media code of ethics
journalism principles
ethical faults
reviews
author_facet Mark Pearson
author_sort Mark Pearson
title REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
title_short REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
title_full REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
title_fullStr REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
title_full_unstemmed REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
title_sort review: quandry over contrasting ethics texts
publisher Pacific Media Centre
series Pacific Journalism Review
issn 1023-9499
2324-2035
publishDate 2005-09-01
description Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of Ethics' clause 4 which stipulates journalists should not allow 'personal interest or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit; to undermine their accuracy, fairness or independence..Hirst and Patching make much of an 'ethical fault line' metaphore throughout their text and refer to objectvity as 'one of the most volatile fault lines in the ideology of reports..."
topic journalism ethics
objectivity
media code of ethics
journalism principles
ethical faults
reviews
url https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063
work_keys_str_mv AT markpearson reviewquandryovercontrastingethicstexts
_version_ 1724586169722732544