REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of E...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pacific Media Centre
2005-09-01
|
Series: | Pacific Journalism Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063 |
id |
doaj-cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cbdc700a92c2430794a65d9b6c9b5fb92020-11-25T03:27:57ZengPacific Media CentrePacific Journalism Review1023-94992324-20352005-09-0111210.24135/pjr.v11i2.1063REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics textsMark Pearson Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching "I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of Ethics' clause 4 which stipulates journalists should not allow 'personal interest or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit; to undermine their accuracy, fairness or independence..Hirst and Patching make much of an 'ethical fault line' metaphore throughout their text and refer to objectvity as 'one of the most volatile fault lines in the ideology of reports..." https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063journalism ethicsobjectivitymedia code of ethicsjournalism principlesethical faultsreviews |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark Pearson |
spellingShingle |
Mark Pearson REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts Pacific Journalism Review journalism ethics objectivity media code of ethics journalism principles ethical faults reviews |
author_facet |
Mark Pearson |
author_sort |
Mark Pearson |
title |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
title_short |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
title_full |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
title_fullStr |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
title_full_unstemmed |
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
title_sort |
review: quandry over contrasting ethics texts |
publisher |
Pacific Media Centre |
series |
Pacific Journalism Review |
issn |
1023-9499 2324-2035 |
publishDate |
2005-09-01 |
description |
Review of Journalism Ethics: Arguments and Cases, by Martin Hirst and Roger Patching
"I have sought advice from both texts on this kind of delimma: journalists allowing personal allegiances to influence them in the course of their duty. Richard points to the flaws in Australian MEAA Code of Ethics' clause 4 which stipulates journalists should not allow 'personal interest or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit; to undermine their accuracy, fairness or independence..Hirst and Patching make much of an 'ethical fault line' metaphore throughout their text and refer to objectvity as 'one of the most volatile fault lines in the ideology of reports..."
|
topic |
journalism ethics objectivity media code of ethics journalism principles ethical faults reviews |
url |
https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1063 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markpearson reviewquandryovercontrastingethicstexts |
_version_ |
1724586169722732544 |