A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy
Background and Purpose: The clinical introduction of on-table adaptive radiotherapy with Magnetic Resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators (Linacs) yields new challenges and potential risks. Since the adapted plan is created within a highly interdisciplinary workflow with the patient in treatment p...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631620300804 |
id |
doaj-cbe2d7f79fb54a22b6a04d42ef05e393 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastian Klüter Oliver Schrenk Claudia Katharina Renkamp Stefan Gliessmann Melanie Kress Jürgen Debus Juliane Hörner-Rieber |
spellingShingle |
Sebastian Klüter Oliver Schrenk Claudia Katharina Renkamp Stefan Gliessmann Melanie Kress Jürgen Debus Juliane Hörner-Rieber A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology FMEA Risk management MR-guided radiation therapy Online adaptive On-table adaptive |
author_facet |
Sebastian Klüter Oliver Schrenk Claudia Katharina Renkamp Stefan Gliessmann Melanie Kress Jürgen Debus Juliane Hörner-Rieber |
author_sort |
Sebastian Klüter |
title |
A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy |
title_short |
A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy |
title_full |
A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy |
title_fullStr |
A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy |
title_sort |
practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
issn |
2405-6316 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Background and Purpose: The clinical introduction of on-table adaptive radiotherapy with Magnetic Resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators (Linacs) yields new challenges and potential risks. Since the adapted plan is created within a highly interdisciplinary workflow with the patient in treatment position, time pressure or erroneous communication may lead to various possibly hazardous situations. To identify risks and implement a safe workflow, a proactive risk analysis has been conducted. Materials and Methods: A process failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (P-FMECA) was performed within a group of radiation therapy technologists, physicians and physicists together with an external moderator. The workflow for on-table adaptive MR-guided treatments was defined and for each step potentially hazardous situations were identified. The risks were evaluated within the team in order to homogenize risk assessment. The team elaborated and discussed possible mitigation strategies and carried out their implementation. Results: In total, 89 risks were identified for the entire MR-guided online adaptive workflow. After mitigation, all risks could be minimized to an acceptable level. Overall, the need for a standardized workflow, clear-defined protocols together with the need for checklists to ensure protocol adherence were identified among the most important mitigation measures. Moreover, additional quality assurance processes and automated plan checks were developed. Conclusions: Despite additional workload and beyond the fulfilment of legal requirements, execution of the P-FMECA within an interdisciplinary team helped all involved occupational groups to develop and foster an open culture of safety and to ensure a consensus for an efficient and safe online adaptive radiotherapy workflow. |
topic |
FMEA Risk management MR-guided radiation therapy Online adaptive On-table adaptive |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631620300804 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastiankluter apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT oliverschrenk apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT claudiakatharinarenkamp apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT stefangliessmann apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT melaniekress apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT jurgendebus apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT julianehornerrieber apracticalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT sebastiankluter practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT oliverschrenk practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT claudiakatharinarenkamp practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT stefangliessmann practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT melaniekress practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT jurgendebus practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy AT julianehornerrieber practicalimplementationofriskmanagementfortheclinicalintroductionofonlineadaptivemagneticresonanceguidedradiotherapy |
_version_ |
1724213356861063168 |
spelling |
doaj-cbe2d7f79fb54a22b6a04d42ef05e3932021-03-19T07:27:11ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162021-01-01175357A practical implementation of risk management for the clinical introduction of online adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapySebastian Klüter0Oliver Schrenk1Claudia Katharina Renkamp2Stefan Gliessmann3Melanie Kress4Jürgen Debus5Juliane Hörner-Rieber6Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, GermanyStefan Gliessmann Risk Management & Consulting, Hildesheim, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core-center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, GermanyBackground and Purpose: The clinical introduction of on-table adaptive radiotherapy with Magnetic Resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators (Linacs) yields new challenges and potential risks. Since the adapted plan is created within a highly interdisciplinary workflow with the patient in treatment position, time pressure or erroneous communication may lead to various possibly hazardous situations. To identify risks and implement a safe workflow, a proactive risk analysis has been conducted. Materials and Methods: A process failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (P-FMECA) was performed within a group of radiation therapy technologists, physicians and physicists together with an external moderator. The workflow for on-table adaptive MR-guided treatments was defined and for each step potentially hazardous situations were identified. The risks were evaluated within the team in order to homogenize risk assessment. The team elaborated and discussed possible mitigation strategies and carried out their implementation. Results: In total, 89 risks were identified for the entire MR-guided online adaptive workflow. After mitigation, all risks could be minimized to an acceptable level. Overall, the need for a standardized workflow, clear-defined protocols together with the need for checklists to ensure protocol adherence were identified among the most important mitigation measures. Moreover, additional quality assurance processes and automated plan checks were developed. Conclusions: Despite additional workload and beyond the fulfilment of legal requirements, execution of the P-FMECA within an interdisciplinary team helped all involved occupational groups to develop and foster an open culture of safety and to ensure a consensus for an efficient and safe online adaptive radiotherapy workflow.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631620300804FMEARisk managementMR-guided radiation therapyOnline adaptiveOn-table adaptive |