Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian

The article discusses the development of the Proto-Indo-European sequences *<em>-eum</em> and *<em>-eh<em><sub>2</sub></em>m</em>. The former produced *<em>-ēm</em>, allegedly through loss of *<em>-u-</em> with compensatory leng...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tijmen Pronk
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University 2017-02-01
Series:Baltistica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2267
id doaj-cbeb0da7ba8e407288fbbb3ad6f6c749
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbeb0da7ba8e407288fbbb3ad6f6c7492020-11-24T20:48:21ZdeuVilnius UniversityBaltistica0132-65032345-00452017-02-01511193510.15388/baltistica.51.1.22672129Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-IranianTijmen PronkThe article discusses the development of the Proto-Indo-European sequences *<em>-eum</em> and *<em>-eh<em><sub>2</sub></em>m</em>. The former produced *<em>-ēm</em>, allegedly through loss of *<em>-u-</em> with compensatory lengthening of the preceding *<em>-e- </em>(“Stang’s law”), while *<em>-eh<em><sub>2</sub></em>m</em> allegedly produced *<em>-ām</em> within the proto-language <em></em>(“extended Stang’s law”). The evidence for both claims is scrutinized, with special emphasis on the acc.sg. and acc.pl. endings of the <em>ā-</em>stems in Indo-Iranian and Baltic and the Proto-Indo-European paradigm of the word for ‘cow’. It is concluded that “extended Stang’s law” cannot be maintained and that “Stang’s law” is probably inorrect, too. Alternative explanations for the attested forms are given.http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2267Indo-EuropeanBalticGreekIndo-IranianStang's lawlaryngealsā-stems
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tijmen Pronk
spellingShingle Tijmen Pronk
Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian
Baltistica
Indo-European
Baltic
Greek
Indo-Iranian
Stang's law
laryngeals
ā-stems
author_facet Tijmen Pronk
author_sort Tijmen Pronk
title Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian
title_short Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian
title_full Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian
title_fullStr Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian
title_full_unstemmed Stang’s Law in Baltic, Greek and Indo-Iranian
title_sort stang’s law in baltic, greek and indo-iranian
publisher Vilnius University
series Baltistica
issn 0132-6503
2345-0045
publishDate 2017-02-01
description The article discusses the development of the Proto-Indo-European sequences *<em>-eum</em> and *<em>-eh<em><sub>2</sub></em>m</em>. The former produced *<em>-ēm</em>, allegedly through loss of *<em>-u-</em> with compensatory lengthening of the preceding *<em>-e- </em>(“Stang’s law”), while *<em>-eh<em><sub>2</sub></em>m</em> allegedly produced *<em>-ām</em> within the proto-language <em></em>(“extended Stang’s law”). The evidence for both claims is scrutinized, with special emphasis on the acc.sg. and acc.pl. endings of the <em>ā-</em>stems in Indo-Iranian and Baltic and the Proto-Indo-European paradigm of the word for ‘cow’. It is concluded that “extended Stang’s law” cannot be maintained and that “Stang’s law” is probably inorrect, too. Alternative explanations for the attested forms are given.
topic Indo-European
Baltic
Greek
Indo-Iranian
Stang's law
laryngeals
ā-stems
url http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2267
work_keys_str_mv AT tijmenpronk stangslawinbalticgreekandindoiranian
_version_ 1716808123046428672