A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit

When some distractors (old items) precede some others (new items) in an inefficient visual search task, the search is restricted to new items, and yields a phenomenon termed the preview benefit. It has recently been demonstrated that, in this preview search task, the onset of repetitive changes in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takayuki Osugi, Ikuya Murakami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01252/full
id doaj-cc1dfb8f61754669814899df92a88006
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc1dfb8f61754669814899df92a880062020-11-24T23:38:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-07-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.01252273305A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview BenefitTakayuki Osugi0Takayuki Osugi1Ikuya Murakami2Department of Psychology, The University of TokyoTokyo, JapanJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTokyo, JapanDepartment of Psychology, The University of TokyoTokyo, JapanWhen some distractors (old items) precede some others (new items) in an inefficient visual search task, the search is restricted to new items, and yields a phenomenon termed the preview benefit. It has recently been demonstrated that, in this preview search task, the onset of repetitive changes in the background disrupts the preview benefit, whereas a single transient change in the background does not. In the present study, we explored this effect with dynamic background changes occurring in the context of realistic scenes, to examine the robustness and usefulness of visual marking. We examined whether preview benefit in a preview search task survived through task-irrelevant changes in the scene, namely a luminance change and the initiation of coherent motion, both occurring in the background. Luminance change of the background disrupted preview benefit if it was synchronized with the onset of the search display. Furthermore, although the presence of coherent background motion per se did not affect preview benefit, its synchronized initiation with the onset of the search display did disrupt preview benefit if the motion speed was sufficiently high. These results suggest that visual marking can be destroyed by a transient event in the scene if that event is sufficiently drastic.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01252/fullvisual markingbackground changepreview searchpreview benefitinhibition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takayuki Osugi
Takayuki Osugi
Ikuya Murakami
spellingShingle Takayuki Osugi
Takayuki Osugi
Ikuya Murakami
A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit
Frontiers in Psychology
visual marking
background change
preview search
preview benefit
inhibition
author_facet Takayuki Osugi
Takayuki Osugi
Ikuya Murakami
author_sort Takayuki Osugi
title A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit
title_short A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit
title_full A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit
title_fullStr A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit
title_full_unstemmed A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit
title_sort drastic change in background luminance or motion degrades the preview benefit
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2017-07-01
description When some distractors (old items) precede some others (new items) in an inefficient visual search task, the search is restricted to new items, and yields a phenomenon termed the preview benefit. It has recently been demonstrated that, in this preview search task, the onset of repetitive changes in the background disrupts the preview benefit, whereas a single transient change in the background does not. In the present study, we explored this effect with dynamic background changes occurring in the context of realistic scenes, to examine the robustness and usefulness of visual marking. We examined whether preview benefit in a preview search task survived through task-irrelevant changes in the scene, namely a luminance change and the initiation of coherent motion, both occurring in the background. Luminance change of the background disrupted preview benefit if it was synchronized with the onset of the search display. Furthermore, although the presence of coherent background motion per se did not affect preview benefit, its synchronized initiation with the onset of the search display did disrupt preview benefit if the motion speed was sufficiently high. These results suggest that visual marking can be destroyed by a transient event in the scene if that event is sufficiently drastic.
topic visual marking
background change
preview search
preview benefit
inhibition
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01252/full
work_keys_str_mv AT takayukiosugi adrasticchangeinbackgroundluminanceormotiondegradesthepreviewbenefit
AT takayukiosugi adrasticchangeinbackgroundluminanceormotiondegradesthepreviewbenefit
AT ikuyamurakami adrasticchangeinbackgroundluminanceormotiondegradesthepreviewbenefit
AT takayukiosugi drasticchangeinbackgroundluminanceormotiondegradesthepreviewbenefit
AT takayukiosugi drasticchangeinbackgroundluminanceormotiondegradesthepreviewbenefit
AT ikuyamurakami drasticchangeinbackgroundluminanceormotiondegradesthepreviewbenefit
_version_ 1725516190494752768