Bodily action penetrates affective perception

Fantoni & Gerbino (2014) showed that subtle postural shifts associated with reaching can have a strong hedonic impact and affect how actors experience facial expressions of emotion. Using a novel Motor Action Mood Induction Procedure (MAMIP), they found consistent congruency effects in participa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlo Fantoni, Sara Rigutti, Walter Gerbino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2016-02-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/1677.pdf
id doaj-cc6131764e944aedbb2b54efcd924bd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc6131764e944aedbb2b54efcd924bd02020-11-25T00:10:54ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592016-02-014e167710.7717/peerj.1677Bodily action penetrates affective perceptionCarlo FantoniSara RiguttiWalter GerbinoFantoni & Gerbino (2014) showed that subtle postural shifts associated with reaching can have a strong hedonic impact and affect how actors experience facial expressions of emotion. Using a novel Motor Action Mood Induction Procedure (MAMIP), they found consistent congruency effects in participants who performed a facial emotion identification task after a sequence of visually-guided reaches: a face perceived as neutral in a baseline condition appeared slightly happy after comfortable actions and slightly angry after uncomfortable actions. However, skeptics about the penetrability of perception (Zeimbekis & Raftopoulos, 2015) would consider such evidence insufficient to demonstrate that observer’s internal states induced by action comfort/discomfort affect perception in a top-down fashion. The action-modulated mood might have produced a back-end memory effect capable of affecting post-perceptual and decision processing, but not front-end perception. Here, we present evidence that performing a facial emotion detection (not identification) task after MAMIP exhibits systematic mood-congruent sensitivity changes, rather than response bias changes attributable to cognitive set shifts; i.e., we show that observer’s internal states induced by bodily action can modulate affective perception. The detection threshold for happiness was lower after fifty comfortable than uncomfortable reaches; while the detection threshold for anger was lower after fifty uncomfortable than comfortable reaches. Action valence induced an overall sensitivity improvement in detecting subtle variations of congruent facial expressions (happiness after positive comfortable actions, anger after negative uncomfortable actions), in the absence of significant response bias shifts. Notably, both comfortable and uncomfortable reaches impact sensitivity in an approximately symmetric way relative to a baseline inaction condition. All of these constitute compelling evidence of a genuine top-down effect on perception: specifically, facial expressions of emotion are penetrable by action-induced mood. Affective priming by action valence is a candidate mechanism for the influence of observer’s internal states on properties experienced as phenomenally objective and yet loaded with meaning.https://peerj.com/articles/1677.pdfMoodFace perceptionPerceptionPenetrabilityEmotionAction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlo Fantoni
Sara Rigutti
Walter Gerbino
spellingShingle Carlo Fantoni
Sara Rigutti
Walter Gerbino
Bodily action penetrates affective perception
PeerJ
Mood
Face perception
Perception
Penetrability
Emotion
Action
author_facet Carlo Fantoni
Sara Rigutti
Walter Gerbino
author_sort Carlo Fantoni
title Bodily action penetrates affective perception
title_short Bodily action penetrates affective perception
title_full Bodily action penetrates affective perception
title_fullStr Bodily action penetrates affective perception
title_full_unstemmed Bodily action penetrates affective perception
title_sort bodily action penetrates affective perception
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Fantoni & Gerbino (2014) showed that subtle postural shifts associated with reaching can have a strong hedonic impact and affect how actors experience facial expressions of emotion. Using a novel Motor Action Mood Induction Procedure (MAMIP), they found consistent congruency effects in participants who performed a facial emotion identification task after a sequence of visually-guided reaches: a face perceived as neutral in a baseline condition appeared slightly happy after comfortable actions and slightly angry after uncomfortable actions. However, skeptics about the penetrability of perception (Zeimbekis & Raftopoulos, 2015) would consider such evidence insufficient to demonstrate that observer’s internal states induced by action comfort/discomfort affect perception in a top-down fashion. The action-modulated mood might have produced a back-end memory effect capable of affecting post-perceptual and decision processing, but not front-end perception. Here, we present evidence that performing a facial emotion detection (not identification) task after MAMIP exhibits systematic mood-congruent sensitivity changes, rather than response bias changes attributable to cognitive set shifts; i.e., we show that observer’s internal states induced by bodily action can modulate affective perception. The detection threshold for happiness was lower after fifty comfortable than uncomfortable reaches; while the detection threshold for anger was lower after fifty uncomfortable than comfortable reaches. Action valence induced an overall sensitivity improvement in detecting subtle variations of congruent facial expressions (happiness after positive comfortable actions, anger after negative uncomfortable actions), in the absence of significant response bias shifts. Notably, both comfortable and uncomfortable reaches impact sensitivity in an approximately symmetric way relative to a baseline inaction condition. All of these constitute compelling evidence of a genuine top-down effect on perception: specifically, facial expressions of emotion are penetrable by action-induced mood. Affective priming by action valence is a candidate mechanism for the influence of observer’s internal states on properties experienced as phenomenally objective and yet loaded with meaning.
topic Mood
Face perception
Perception
Penetrability
Emotion
Action
url https://peerj.com/articles/1677.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT carlofantoni bodilyactionpenetratesaffectiveperception
AT sararigutti bodilyactionpenetratesaffectiveperception
AT waltergerbino bodilyactionpenetratesaffectiveperception
_version_ 1725406412344918016