Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.

Government-managed marine protected areas (MPAs) can restore small fish stocks, but have been heavily criticized for excluding resource users and creating conflicts. A promising but less studied alternative are community-managed MPAs, where resource users are more involved in MPA design, implementat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelica A D Chirico, Timothy R McClanahan, Johan S Eklöf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5555630?pdf=render
id doaj-cc6825b2a7f34529bf9202787020a4c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc6825b2a7f34529bf9202787020a4c52020-11-24T21:39:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018234210.1371/journal.pone.0182342Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.Angelica A D ChiricoTimothy R McClanahanJohan S EklöfGovernment-managed marine protected areas (MPAs) can restore small fish stocks, but have been heavily criticized for excluding resource users and creating conflicts. A promising but less studied alternative are community-managed MPAs, where resource users are more involved in MPA design, implementation and enforcement. Here we evaluated effects of government- and community-managed MPAs on the density, size and biomass of seagrass- and coral reef-associated fish, using field surveys in Kenyan coastal lagoons. We also assessed protection effects on the potential monetary value of fish; a variable that increases non-linearly with fish body mass and is particularly important from a fishery perspective. We found that two recently established community MPAs (< 1 km2 in size, ≤ 5 years of protection) harbored larger fish and greater total fish biomass than two fished (open access) areas, in both seagrass beds and coral reefs. As expected, protection effects were considerably stronger in the older and larger government MPAs. Importantly, across management and habitat types, the protection effect on the potential monetary value of the fish was much stronger than the effects on fish biomass and size (6.7 vs. 2.6 and 1.3 times higher value in community MPAs than in fished areas, respectively). This strong effect on potential value was partly explained by presence of larger (and therefore more valuable) individual fish, and partly by higher densities of high-value taxa (e.g. rabbitfish). In summary, we show that i) small and recently established community-managed MPAs can, just like larger and older government-managed MPAs, play an important role for local conservation of high-value fish, and that ii) these effects are equally strong in coral reefs as in seagrass beds; an important habitat too rarely included in formal management. Consequently, community-managed MPAs could benefit both coral reef and seagrass ecosystems and provide spillover of valuable fish to nearby fisheries.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5555630?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angelica A D Chirico
Timothy R McClanahan
Johan S Eklöf
spellingShingle Angelica A D Chirico
Timothy R McClanahan
Johan S Eklöf
Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Angelica A D Chirico
Timothy R McClanahan
Johan S Eklöf
author_sort Angelica A D Chirico
title Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
title_short Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
title_full Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
title_fullStr Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
title_full_unstemmed Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
title_sort community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Government-managed marine protected areas (MPAs) can restore small fish stocks, but have been heavily criticized for excluding resource users and creating conflicts. A promising but less studied alternative are community-managed MPAs, where resource users are more involved in MPA design, implementation and enforcement. Here we evaluated effects of government- and community-managed MPAs on the density, size and biomass of seagrass- and coral reef-associated fish, using field surveys in Kenyan coastal lagoons. We also assessed protection effects on the potential monetary value of fish; a variable that increases non-linearly with fish body mass and is particularly important from a fishery perspective. We found that two recently established community MPAs (< 1 km2 in size, ≤ 5 years of protection) harbored larger fish and greater total fish biomass than two fished (open access) areas, in both seagrass beds and coral reefs. As expected, protection effects were considerably stronger in the older and larger government MPAs. Importantly, across management and habitat types, the protection effect on the potential monetary value of the fish was much stronger than the effects on fish biomass and size (6.7 vs. 2.6 and 1.3 times higher value in community MPAs than in fished areas, respectively). This strong effect on potential value was partly explained by presence of larger (and therefore more valuable) individual fish, and partly by higher densities of high-value taxa (e.g. rabbitfish). In summary, we show that i) small and recently established community-managed MPAs can, just like larger and older government-managed MPAs, play an important role for local conservation of high-value fish, and that ii) these effects are equally strong in coral reefs as in seagrass beds; an important habitat too rarely included in formal management. Consequently, community-managed MPAs could benefit both coral reef and seagrass ecosystems and provide spillover of valuable fish to nearby fisheries.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5555630?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT angelicaadchirico communityandgovernmentmanagedmarineprotectedareasincreasefishsizebiomassandpotentialvalue
AT timothyrmcclanahan communityandgovernmentmanagedmarineprotectedareasincreasefishsizebiomassandpotentialvalue
AT johanseklof communityandgovernmentmanagedmarineprotectedareasincreasefishsizebiomassandpotentialvalue
_version_ 1725932239041069056