Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aims: Submucosal injection is standard practice in endoscopic mucosal resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Several solutions are used. Our aim was to systematically review their efficacy and safety. Patients and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira, Joana Moleiro, Joana Torres, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-01-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1393079
id doaj-cc811350cb7c4d9f9b879811b01c5ff8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc811350cb7c4d9f9b879811b01c5ff82020-11-25T02:31:40ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362016-01-010401E1E1610.1055/s-0034-1393079Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysisAlexandre Oliveira Ferreira0Joana Moleiro1Joana Torres2Mario Dinis-Ribeiro3Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisboa, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisboa, PortugalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia do Porto, Porto, PortugalBackground and aims: Submucosal injection is standard practice in endoscopic mucosal resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Several solutions are used. Our aim was to systematically review their efficacy and safety. Patients and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random effects model of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from MEDLINE. Studies in animal models were qualitatively assessed for efficacy and safety. Results: In total, 54 studies were qualitatively assessed. Eleven RCTs were analyzed, two of which were on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The quantitative synthesis included nine RCTs on endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), comprising 792 subjects and 793 lesions. Mean lesion size was 20.9 mm (range 8.5 – 46 mm). A total of 209 lesions were randomized to sodium hyaluronate (SH) vs normal saline (NS), 72 to 50 % dextrose (D50) vs NS, 82 to D50 vs SH, 43 to succinylated gelatin, 25 to hydroxyethyl starch and 36 to fibrinogen. In total, 385 were randomized to NS as controls. NS and SH are the best studied solutions and seem to be equally effective in achieving complete resection (OR 1.09; 95 %CI 0.82, 1.45). No solution was proven to be superior in complete resection rate, post-polypectomy bleeding or coagulation syndrome/perforation incidence. Many solutions have been tested in animal studies and most seem more effective for mucosal elevation than NS. Conclusions: There are several solutions in clinical use and many more under research, but most are poorly studied. SH seems to be clinically equivalent to NS. There are no significant differences in post-polypectomy complications. Larger RCTs are needed to determine any small differences that may exist between solutions.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1393079
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira
Joana Moleiro
Joana Torres
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
spellingShingle Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira
Joana Moleiro
Joana Torres
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira
Joana Moleiro
Joana Torres
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
author_sort Alexandre Oliveira Ferreira
title Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background and aims: Submucosal injection is standard practice in endoscopic mucosal resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Several solutions are used. Our aim was to systematically review their efficacy and safety. Patients and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random effects model of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from MEDLINE. Studies in animal models were qualitatively assessed for efficacy and safety. Results: In total, 54 studies were qualitatively assessed. Eleven RCTs were analyzed, two of which were on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The quantitative synthesis included nine RCTs on endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), comprising 792 subjects and 793 lesions. Mean lesion size was 20.9 mm (range 8.5 – 46 mm). A total of 209 lesions were randomized to sodium hyaluronate (SH) vs normal saline (NS), 72 to 50 % dextrose (D50) vs NS, 82 to D50 vs SH, 43 to succinylated gelatin, 25 to hydroxyethyl starch and 36 to fibrinogen. In total, 385 were randomized to NS as controls. NS and SH are the best studied solutions and seem to be equally effective in achieving complete resection (OR 1.09; 95 %CI 0.82, 1.45). No solution was proven to be superior in complete resection rate, post-polypectomy bleeding or coagulation syndrome/perforation incidence. Many solutions have been tested in animal studies and most seem more effective for mucosal elevation than NS. Conclusions: There are several solutions in clinical use and many more under research, but most are poorly studied. SH seems to be clinically equivalent to NS. There are no significant differences in post-polypectomy complications. Larger RCTs are needed to determine any small differences that may exist between solutions.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1393079
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandreoliveiraferreira solutionsforsubmucosalinjectioninendoscopicresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joanamoleiro solutionsforsubmucosalinjectioninendoscopicresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joanatorres solutionsforsubmucosalinjectioninendoscopicresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariodinisribeiro solutionsforsubmucosalinjectioninendoscopicresectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724822820913938432