Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?

The present study examined the factors that determine the dwell times in a visual search task, that is, the duration the gaze remains fixated on an object. It has been suggested that an item's similarity to the search target should be an important determiner of dwell times, because dwell times...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefanie I Becker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3050928?pdf=render
id doaj-cc98e7ee45414f4aabe665c7b8d2ec01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc98e7ee45414f4aabe665c7b8d2ec012020-11-25T02:32:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0163e1774010.1371/journal.pone.0017740Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?Stefanie I BeckerThe present study examined the factors that determine the dwell times in a visual search task, that is, the duration the gaze remains fixated on an object. It has been suggested that an item's similarity to the search target should be an important determiner of dwell times, because dwell times are taken to reflect the time needed to reject the item as a distractor, and such discriminations are supposed to be harder the more similar an item is to the search target. In line with this similarity view, a previous study shows that, in search for a target ring of thin line-width, dwell times on thin linewidth Landolt C's distractors were longer than dwell times on Landolt C's with thick or medium linewidth. However, dwell times may have been longer on thin Landolt C's because the thin line-width made it harder to detect whether the stimuli had a gap or not. Thus, it is an open question whether dwell times on thin line-width distractors were longer because they were similar to the target or because the perceptual decision was more difficult. The present study de-coupled similarity from perceptual difficulty, by measuring dwell times on thin, medium and thick line-width distractors when the target had thin, medium or thick line-width. The results showed that dwell times were longer on target-similar than target-dissimilar stimuli across all target conditions and regardless of the line-width. It is concluded that prior findings of longer dwell times on thin linewidth-distractors can clearly be attributed to target similarity. As will be discussed towards the end, the finding of similarity effects on dwell times has important implications for current theories of visual search and eye movement control.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3050928?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefanie I Becker
spellingShingle Stefanie I Becker
Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stefanie I Becker
author_sort Stefanie I Becker
title Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
title_short Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
title_full Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
title_fullStr Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
title_sort determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The present study examined the factors that determine the dwell times in a visual search task, that is, the duration the gaze remains fixated on an object. It has been suggested that an item's similarity to the search target should be an important determiner of dwell times, because dwell times are taken to reflect the time needed to reject the item as a distractor, and such discriminations are supposed to be harder the more similar an item is to the search target. In line with this similarity view, a previous study shows that, in search for a target ring of thin line-width, dwell times on thin linewidth Landolt C's distractors were longer than dwell times on Landolt C's with thick or medium linewidth. However, dwell times may have been longer on thin Landolt C's because the thin line-width made it harder to detect whether the stimuli had a gap or not. Thus, it is an open question whether dwell times on thin line-width distractors were longer because they were similar to the target or because the perceptual decision was more difficult. The present study de-coupled similarity from perceptual difficulty, by measuring dwell times on thin, medium and thick line-width distractors when the target had thin, medium or thick line-width. The results showed that dwell times were longer on target-similar than target-dissimilar stimuli across all target conditions and regardless of the line-width. It is concluded that prior findings of longer dwell times on thin linewidth-distractors can clearly be attributed to target similarity. As will be discussed towards the end, the finding of similarity effects on dwell times has important implications for current theories of visual search and eye movement control.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3050928?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanieibecker determinantsofdwelltimeinvisualsearchsimilarityorperceptualdifficulty
_version_ 1724820783477293056