Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review
Active design is an emerging concept to incorporate physical activity into daily life through thoughtful design, and is often implemented in new building designs. It is, however, not known what evidence base there is to support the claims. Through this systematic review, the current evidence for act...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9228 |
id |
doaj-cca49c16a5024b8daaf436d16e517ba0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cca49c16a5024b8daaf436d16e517ba02020-12-11T00:02:16ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-12-01179228922810.3390/ijerph17249228Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic ReviewLina Engelen0Active Spaces, Thirroul, NSW 2515, AustraliaActive design is an emerging concept to incorporate physical activity into daily life through thoughtful design, and is often implemented in new building designs. It is, however, not known what evidence base there is to support the claims. Through this systematic review, the current evidence for active design was investigated. Seven databases were searched. A range of search terms relating to active design, physical activity, sitting, performance and wellbeing were used. After title and abstract screening of 1174 papers and full-text screening, 17 were selected for inclusion. The papers provided promising evidence of active design aiding a reduction in sitting and increase in standing time. Limited evidence was found for physical activity; a few studies reported an increase in step counts. Musculoskeletal effects were investigated in few studies, but there is some evidence of benefits to lower back pain. There was consistent evidence for better light and air quality, but no evidence for other features of the workplace environment. No conclusive evidence was found on associations between active design features and work performance. There is hence some evidence to support the benefit of active design on physical health; however, the dearth and heterogeneity of the study designs, measures and findings warrant further research.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9228active designofficephysical activityreviewhealth |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lina Engelen |
spellingShingle |
Lina Engelen Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health active design office physical activity review health |
author_facet |
Lina Engelen |
author_sort |
Lina Engelen |
title |
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_short |
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
does active design influence activity, sitting, wellbeing and productivity in the workplace? a systematic review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Active design is an emerging concept to incorporate physical activity into daily life through thoughtful design, and is often implemented in new building designs. It is, however, not known what evidence base there is to support the claims. Through this systematic review, the current evidence for active design was investigated. Seven databases were searched. A range of search terms relating to active design, physical activity, sitting, performance and wellbeing were used. After title and abstract screening of 1174 papers and full-text screening, 17 were selected for inclusion. The papers provided promising evidence of active design aiding a reduction in sitting and increase in standing time. Limited evidence was found for physical activity; a few studies reported an increase in step counts. Musculoskeletal effects were investigated in few studies, but there is some evidence of benefits to lower back pain. There was consistent evidence for better light and air quality, but no evidence for other features of the workplace environment. No conclusive evidence was found on associations between active design features and work performance. There is hence some evidence to support the benefit of active design on physical health; however, the dearth and heterogeneity of the study designs, measures and findings warrant further research. |
topic |
active design office physical activity review health |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9228 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linaengelen doesactivedesigninfluenceactivitysittingwellbeingandproductivityintheworkplaceasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724387184907124736 |