Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity

BackgroundThe overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fateh Bazerbachi, Barham K Abu Dayyeh, Eric J Vargas, Andrew C Storm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-01
Series:BMJ Open Gastroenterology
id doaj-cccc47fcb3a34977ab1e537ad8d23e6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cccc47fcb3a34977ab1e537ad8d23e6f2020-11-25T02:32:38ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Gastroenterology2054-47742019-06-016110.1136/bmjgast-2019-000273Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesityFateh BazerbachiBarham K Abu DayyehEric J VargasAndrew C StormBackgroundThe overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency (AE).MethodsSubjects from an ongoing AT clinical trial were enrolled in this study. AE was calculated as the absolute gastric residual and calories aspirated at 20 and 40 min. Participants were then divided by baseline GE rate into two groups (slow vs fast). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare AE at 20 and 40 min between the groups. Exploratory linear regression was used to assess relationship between GE and AE.Results7 patients (85% female) were coenrolled in the study. Mean age and body mass index were 39.8±9.44 and 43±5, respectively. AE did not significantly differ between the 20 and 40 min time points for the group as a whole (34.3% vs 36.9%; p>0.5). However, those with fast GE aspirated more calories than those with slow GE (20 min: 200 kcal vs 72.5 kcal; 40 min: 154 kcal vs 63 kcal) (p=0.05). On linear regression, delayed GE was associated with poorer aspiration (20 min: β=−107 calories; p=0.019; R2=0.7). 4/7 patients had significant differences in residual/caloric aspiration across the two time points.ConclusionPatients undergoing AT may benefit from a GE test to optimise their AE. Paradoxically faster GE times saw better aspiration. Prospective studies are revealing a personalised approach to obesity.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fateh Bazerbachi
Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Eric J Vargas
Andrew C Storm
spellingShingle Fateh Bazerbachi
Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Eric J Vargas
Andrew C Storm
Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
author_facet Fateh Bazerbachi
Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Eric J Vargas
Andrew C Storm
author_sort Fateh Bazerbachi
title Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_short Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_full Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_fullStr Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_full_unstemmed Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_sort accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Gastroenterology
issn 2054-4774
publishDate 2019-06-01
description BackgroundThe overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency (AE).MethodsSubjects from an ongoing AT clinical trial were enrolled in this study. AE was calculated as the absolute gastric residual and calories aspirated at 20 and 40 min. Participants were then divided by baseline GE rate into two groups (slow vs fast). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare AE at 20 and 40 min between the groups. Exploratory linear regression was used to assess relationship between GE and AE.Results7 patients (85% female) were coenrolled in the study. Mean age and body mass index were 39.8±9.44 and 43±5, respectively. AE did not significantly differ between the 20 and 40 min time points for the group as a whole (34.3% vs 36.9%; p>0.5). However, those with fast GE aspirated more calories than those with slow GE (20 min: 200 kcal vs 72.5 kcal; 40 min: 154 kcal vs 63 kcal) (p=0.05). On linear regression, delayed GE was associated with poorer aspiration (20 min: β=−107 calories; p=0.019; R2=0.7). 4/7 patients had significant differences in residual/caloric aspiration across the two time points.ConclusionPatients undergoing AT may benefit from a GE test to optimise their AE. Paradoxically faster GE times saw better aspiration. Prospective studies are revealing a personalised approach to obesity.
work_keys_str_mv AT fatehbazerbachi acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
AT barhamkabudayyeh acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
AT ericjvargas acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
AT andrewcstorm acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
_version_ 1724818866005082112