Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.

Kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), a unique mitochondrial structure common to trypanosomatid parasites, contains thousands of DNA minicircles that are densely packed and can be topologically linked into a chain mail-like network. Experimental data indicate that every minicircle in the network is, on average, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuanan Diao, Victor Rodriguez, Michele Klingbeil, Javier Arsuaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4482025?pdf=render
id doaj-cccf5db65f2e49fba8a11cc01fe5c911
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cccf5db65f2e49fba8a11cc01fe5c9112020-11-25T02:06:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e013099810.1371/journal.pone.0130998Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.Yuanan DiaoVictor RodriguezMichele KlingbeilJavier ArsuagaKinetoplast DNA (kDNA), a unique mitochondrial structure common to trypanosomatid parasites, contains thousands of DNA minicircles that are densely packed and can be topologically linked into a chain mail-like network. Experimental data indicate that every minicircle in the network is, on average, singly linked to three other minicircles (i.e., has mean valence 3) before replication and to six minicircles in the late stages of replication. The biophysical factors that determine the topology of the network and its changes during the cell cycle remain unknown. Using a mathematical modeling approach, we previously showed that volume confinement alone can drive the formation of the network and that it induces a linear relationship between mean valence and minicircle density. Our modeling also predicted a minicircle valence two orders of magnitude greater than that observed in kDNA. To determine the factors that contribute to this discrepancy we systematically analyzed the relationship between the topological properties of the network (i.e., minicircle density and mean valence) and its biophysical properties such as DNA bending, electrostatic repulsion, and minicircle relative position and orientation. Significantly, our results showed that most of the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental observations can be accounted for by the orientation of the minicircles with volume exclusion due to electrostatic interactions and DNA bending playing smaller roles. Our results are in agreement with the three dimensional kDNA organization model, initially proposed by Delain and Riou, in which minicircles are oriented almost perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the kDNA disk. We suggest that while minicircle confinement drives the formation of kDNA networks, it is minicircle orientation that regulates the topological complexity of the network.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4482025?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuanan Diao
Victor Rodriguez
Michele Klingbeil
Javier Arsuaga
spellingShingle Yuanan Diao
Victor Rodriguez
Michele Klingbeil
Javier Arsuaga
Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yuanan Diao
Victor Rodriguez
Michele Klingbeil
Javier Arsuaga
author_sort Yuanan Diao
title Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.
title_short Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.
title_full Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.
title_fullStr Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.
title_full_unstemmed Orientation of DNA Minicircles Balances Density and Topological Complexity in Kinetoplast DNA.
title_sort orientation of dna minicircles balances density and topological complexity in kinetoplast dna.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), a unique mitochondrial structure common to trypanosomatid parasites, contains thousands of DNA minicircles that are densely packed and can be topologically linked into a chain mail-like network. Experimental data indicate that every minicircle in the network is, on average, singly linked to three other minicircles (i.e., has mean valence 3) before replication and to six minicircles in the late stages of replication. The biophysical factors that determine the topology of the network and its changes during the cell cycle remain unknown. Using a mathematical modeling approach, we previously showed that volume confinement alone can drive the formation of the network and that it induces a linear relationship between mean valence and minicircle density. Our modeling also predicted a minicircle valence two orders of magnitude greater than that observed in kDNA. To determine the factors that contribute to this discrepancy we systematically analyzed the relationship between the topological properties of the network (i.e., minicircle density and mean valence) and its biophysical properties such as DNA bending, electrostatic repulsion, and minicircle relative position and orientation. Significantly, our results showed that most of the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental observations can be accounted for by the orientation of the minicircles with volume exclusion due to electrostatic interactions and DNA bending playing smaller roles. Our results are in agreement with the three dimensional kDNA organization model, initially proposed by Delain and Riou, in which minicircles are oriented almost perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the kDNA disk. We suggest that while minicircle confinement drives the formation of kDNA networks, it is minicircle orientation that regulates the topological complexity of the network.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4482025?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanandiao orientationofdnaminicirclesbalancesdensityandtopologicalcomplexityinkinetoplastdna
AT victorrodriguez orientationofdnaminicirclesbalancesdensityandtopologicalcomplexityinkinetoplastdna
AT micheleklingbeil orientationofdnaminicirclesbalancesdensityandtopologicalcomplexityinkinetoplastdna
AT javierarsuaga orientationofdnaminicirclesbalancesdensityandtopologicalcomplexityinkinetoplastdna
_version_ 1724934795807424512