Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal. Objectives: This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening. Data Sources: Included...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ann Dalton Bagchi PhD, DNP, Tracy Davis PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2325958220936014
id doaj-ccf6038e8f2f44cdb62da4984d616300
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ccf6038e8f2f44cdb62da4984d6163002020-11-25T03:30:26ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care2325-95822020-06-011910.1177/2325958220936014Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureAnn Dalton Bagchi PhD, DNP0Tracy Davis PhD1 School of Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Health Professions Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Blackwood, NJ, USABackground: Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal. Objectives: This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening. Data Sources: Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018. Eligibility Criteria: Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers’ barriers/facilitators to routine screening. Data Extraction: We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM. Data Synthesis: Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level. Limitations: Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator. Conclusions: Increasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.https://doi.org/10.1177/2325958220936014
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ann Dalton Bagchi PhD, DNP
Tracy Davis PhD
spellingShingle Ann Dalton Bagchi PhD, DNP
Tracy Davis PhD
Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
author_facet Ann Dalton Bagchi PhD, DNP
Tracy Davis PhD
author_sort Ann Dalton Bagchi PhD, DNP
title Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort clinician barriers and facilitators to routine hiv testing: a systematic review of the literature
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
issn 2325-9582
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background: Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal. Objectives: This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening. Data Sources: Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018. Eligibility Criteria: Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers’ barriers/facilitators to routine screening. Data Extraction: We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM. Data Synthesis: Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level. Limitations: Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator. Conclusions: Increasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2325958220936014
work_keys_str_mv AT anndaltonbagchiphddnp clinicianbarriersandfacilitatorstoroutinehivtestingasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT tracydavisphd clinicianbarriersandfacilitatorstoroutinehivtestingasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724575666552176640