Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a key element of synaptic plasticity. At the macroscopic level, similar effects can be induced in the human brain using repetitive stimulation with identical stimuli. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) can increase neuronal responses whereas low-frequency stimulation ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob eLahr, Jessica ePeter, Michael eBach, Irina eMader, Christoph eNissen, Claus eNormann, Christoph P Kaller, Stefan eKlöppel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
VEP
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00695/full
id doaj-ccf7789f04764c6da1c979152b7340d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ccf7789f04764c6da1c979152b7340d22020-11-25T02:34:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612014-09-01810.3389/fnhum.2014.0069597482Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on NeuroplasticityJacob eLahr0Jacob eLahr1Jacob eLahr2Jessica ePeter3Jessica ePeter4Michael eBach5Irina eMader6Christoph eNissen7Claus eNormann8Christoph P Kaller9Christoph P Kaller10Stefan eKlöppel11Stefan eKlöppel12Stefan eKlöppel13University Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity of FreiburgUniversity Medical FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity Medical Center FreiburgLong-term potentiation (LTP) is a key element of synaptic plasticity. At the macroscopic level, similar effects can be induced in the human brain using repetitive stimulation with identical stimuli. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) can increase neuronal responses whereas low-frequency stimulation may produce the opposite effect. Optimal stimulation frequencies and characteristics for inducing stimulus-specific response modification differ substantially from those applied to brain tissue slices but have been explored in recent studies. In contrast, the individual manifestation of this effect in terms of its spatial location and extent are unclear. Using functional MRI (fMRI) in 18 subjects (mean age 25.3 years), we attempted to induce LTP-like effects by HFS with checkerboard flashes at 9 Hz for 120 seconds. As expected, flashes induced strong activation in primary and secondary visual cortices. Contrary to our expectations, we found clusters of decreased activations induced by pattern flashes after HFS at the border between primary and secondary visual cortices.. On the level of the individual subject, some showed significantly increased activations in the post-HFS session while the majority showed significant decreases. The locations of areas showing altered activations before and after HFS were only partly overlapping. No association between location, extent and direction of the HFS-effect was observed.The findings are unexpected in the light of existing HFS-studies, but mirror the high inter-subject variability, concerning even the directionality of the induced effects shown for other indices of LTP-like plasticity in the human brain. As this variability is not observed in LTP at the cellular level, a better understanding of LTP-like mechanisms on the macroscopic level is essential for establishing tools to quantify individual synaptic plasticity in-vivo.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00695/fullNeuronal PlasticityhabituationLTD (Long Term Depression)LTP (Long Term Potentiation)VEPfMRI (Functional Magnet Resonance Imaging)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacob eLahr
Jacob eLahr
Jacob eLahr
Jessica ePeter
Jessica ePeter
Michael eBach
Irina eMader
Christoph eNissen
Claus eNormann
Christoph P Kaller
Christoph P Kaller
Stefan eKlöppel
Stefan eKlöppel
Stefan eKlöppel
spellingShingle Jacob eLahr
Jacob eLahr
Jacob eLahr
Jessica ePeter
Jessica ePeter
Michael eBach
Irina eMader
Christoph eNissen
Claus eNormann
Christoph P Kaller
Christoph P Kaller
Stefan eKlöppel
Stefan eKlöppel
Stefan eKlöppel
Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Neuronal Plasticity
habituation
LTD (Long Term Depression)
LTP (Long Term Potentiation)
VEP
fMRI (Functional Magnet Resonance Imaging)
author_facet Jacob eLahr
Jacob eLahr
Jacob eLahr
Jessica ePeter
Jessica ePeter
Michael eBach
Irina eMader
Christoph eNissen
Claus eNormann
Christoph P Kaller
Christoph P Kaller
Stefan eKlöppel
Stefan eKlöppel
Stefan eKlöppel
author_sort Jacob eLahr
title Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity
title_short Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity
title_full Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity
title_fullStr Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity of Stimulus-specific Response Modification – an fMRI Study on Neuroplasticity
title_sort heterogeneity of stimulus-specific response modification – an fmri study on neuroplasticity
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a key element of synaptic plasticity. At the macroscopic level, similar effects can be induced in the human brain using repetitive stimulation with identical stimuli. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) can increase neuronal responses whereas low-frequency stimulation may produce the opposite effect. Optimal stimulation frequencies and characteristics for inducing stimulus-specific response modification differ substantially from those applied to brain tissue slices but have been explored in recent studies. In contrast, the individual manifestation of this effect in terms of its spatial location and extent are unclear. Using functional MRI (fMRI) in 18 subjects (mean age 25.3 years), we attempted to induce LTP-like effects by HFS with checkerboard flashes at 9 Hz for 120 seconds. As expected, flashes induced strong activation in primary and secondary visual cortices. Contrary to our expectations, we found clusters of decreased activations induced by pattern flashes after HFS at the border between primary and secondary visual cortices.. On the level of the individual subject, some showed significantly increased activations in the post-HFS session while the majority showed significant decreases. The locations of areas showing altered activations before and after HFS were only partly overlapping. No association between location, extent and direction of the HFS-effect was observed.The findings are unexpected in the light of existing HFS-studies, but mirror the high inter-subject variability, concerning even the directionality of the induced effects shown for other indices of LTP-like plasticity in the human brain. As this variability is not observed in LTP at the cellular level, a better understanding of LTP-like mechanisms on the macroscopic level is essential for establishing tools to quantify individual synaptic plasticity in-vivo.
topic Neuronal Plasticity
habituation
LTD (Long Term Depression)
LTP (Long Term Potentiation)
VEP
fMRI (Functional Magnet Resonance Imaging)
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00695/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobelahr heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT jacobelahr heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT jacobelahr heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT jessicaepeter heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT jessicaepeter heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT michaelebach heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT irinaemader heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT christophenissen heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT clausenormann heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT christophpkaller heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT christophpkaller heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT stefanekloppel heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT stefanekloppel heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
AT stefanekloppel heterogeneityofstimulusspecificresponsemodificationanfmristudyonneuroplasticity
_version_ 1724807853930184704