BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health

In this think piece, I examine the difference introduced by BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) health collaborations in an era of global health. Using tuberculosis control as a grounding example, I show that BRICS collaborations prioritize: state-led solutions, particularly throu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emilio Dirlikov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh Library 2015-04-01
Series:Medicine Anthropology Theory
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/4583
id doaj-cd09bd8a54d84d94b4d66fbb21101370
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd09bd8a54d84d94b4d66fbb211013702021-04-22T08:41:41ZengUniversity of Edinburgh LibraryMedicine Anthropology Theory2405-691X2015-04-012110.17157/mat.2.1.1764583BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global healthEmilio DirlikovIn this think piece, I examine the difference introduced by BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) health collaborations in an era of global health. Using tuberculosis control as a grounding example, I show that BRICS collaborations prioritize: state-led solutions, particularly through policies aimed at expanding universal health coverage; scientific and programmatic innovation; experience and technology sharing; clear benchmarks for progress, based on current best practices of control; and flexibility. Unlike international health, BRICS health collaborations are not primarily concerned with preventing the importation of infectious disease across national borders. Nor are they based on global health’s concerns about global biosecurity or humanitarian biomedicine. Rather, BRICS collaborative health efforts fall within the nation-state paradigm, while also aspiring towards the global. They remain flexible in their operation, gesturing towards a neoliberal ethic. This flexibility allows BRICS to work within existing structures, while also establishing their own institutions from which to change traditional assistance relationships.http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/4583tuberculosisglobal healthbricsinternational health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emilio Dirlikov
spellingShingle Emilio Dirlikov
BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
Medicine Anthropology Theory
tuberculosis
global health
brics
international health
author_facet Emilio Dirlikov
author_sort Emilio Dirlikov
title BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
title_short BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
title_full BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
title_fullStr BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
title_full_unstemmed BRICS health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
title_sort brics health and tuberculosis control collaborations during an era of global health
publisher University of Edinburgh Library
series Medicine Anthropology Theory
issn 2405-691X
publishDate 2015-04-01
description In this think piece, I examine the difference introduced by BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) health collaborations in an era of global health. Using tuberculosis control as a grounding example, I show that BRICS collaborations prioritize: state-led solutions, particularly through policies aimed at expanding universal health coverage; scientific and programmatic innovation; experience and technology sharing; clear benchmarks for progress, based on current best practices of control; and flexibility. Unlike international health, BRICS health collaborations are not primarily concerned with preventing the importation of infectious disease across national borders. Nor are they based on global health’s concerns about global biosecurity or humanitarian biomedicine. Rather, BRICS collaborative health efforts fall within the nation-state paradigm, while also aspiring towards the global. They remain flexible in their operation, gesturing towards a neoliberal ethic. This flexibility allows BRICS to work within existing structures, while also establishing their own institutions from which to change traditional assistance relationships.
topic tuberculosis
global health
brics
international health
url http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/4583
work_keys_str_mv AT emiliodirlikov bricshealthandtuberculosiscontrolcollaborationsduringaneraofglobalhealth
_version_ 1721514825397305344