Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of surface treatments such as tooth reduction and extending the etching time on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of composite resin to normal and fluorotic enamel after microabrasion. Materials and Methods: Fifty non-carious anterior teeth wer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahshid Mohammadi Basir, Mohammad Bagher Rezvani, Elham Tabatabai Ghomsheh, Zahra Malek Hosseini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1316
id doaj-cd74c225b6fd4a6bb0bb56cecbdbdbd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd74c225b6fd4a6bb0bb56cecbdbdbd92020-11-25T03:47:02ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2017-01-01136892Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after MicroabrasionMahshid Mohammadi Basir0Mohammad Bagher Rezvani1Elham Tabatabai Ghomsheh2Zahra Malek Hosseini3Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of surface treatments such as tooth reduction and extending the etching time on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of composite resin to normal and fluorotic enamel after microabrasion. Materials and Methods: Fifty non-carious anterior teeth were classified into two groups of normal and fluorotic (n=25) using Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI=4-6). Teeth in each group were treated with five modalities as follows and restored with OptiBond FL and Z350 composite resin: 1-Etching (30 seconds), bonding, filling (B); 2-Tooth reduction (0.3mm), etching, bonding, filling (R-B); 3-Microabrasion (120 seconds), etching, bonding, filling (M-B); 4- Microabrasion, tooth reduction, etching, bonding, filling (M-R-B); and 5- Microabrasion, etching (60 seconds), bonding, filling (M-2E-B). Ten experimental groups (n=5) were designed; 150 rectangular samples (10 in each group) with a cross-sectional area of 1×1mm2 were prepared for µTBS test. Failure mode was determined under a stereomicroscope and one specimen was selected from each group for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Results: The µTBS to normal enamel was higher than to fluorotic enamel in all groups except for group (R-B). The Maximum and minimum µTBS were noted in the group (normal, reduction, bonding) and (fluorosed, microabrasion, bonding), respectively.  Tooth reduction increased µTBS more effectively than extended etching time after microabrasion. Conclusions: Fluorosis may reduce µTBS of composite resin to enamel. Microabrasion reduced the bond strength. Tooth reduction and extended etching time increased µTBS of composite resin to both normal and fluorotic enamel.   https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1316FluorosisDentalEnamel MicroabrasionDental BondingComposite Resins
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahshid Mohammadi Basir
Mohammad Bagher Rezvani
Elham Tabatabai Ghomsheh
Zahra Malek Hosseini
spellingShingle Mahshid Mohammadi Basir
Mohammad Bagher Rezvani
Elham Tabatabai Ghomsheh
Zahra Malek Hosseini
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion
Frontiers in Dentistry
Fluorosis
Dental
Enamel Microabrasion
Dental Bonding
Composite Resins
author_facet Mahshid Mohammadi Basir
Mohammad Bagher Rezvani
Elham Tabatabai Ghomsheh
Zahra Malek Hosseini
author_sort Mahshid Mohammadi Basir
title Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion
title_short Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion
title_full Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion
title_fullStr Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Normal and Fluorotic Enamel after Microabrasion
title_sort effect of different surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of composite resin to normal and fluorotic enamel after microabrasion
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Frontiers in Dentistry
issn 2676-296X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of surface treatments such as tooth reduction and extending the etching time on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of composite resin to normal and fluorotic enamel after microabrasion. Materials and Methods: Fifty non-carious anterior teeth were classified into two groups of normal and fluorotic (n=25) using Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI=4-6). Teeth in each group were treated with five modalities as follows and restored with OptiBond FL and Z350 composite resin: 1-Etching (30 seconds), bonding, filling (B); 2-Tooth reduction (0.3mm), etching, bonding, filling (R-B); 3-Microabrasion (120 seconds), etching, bonding, filling (M-B); 4- Microabrasion, tooth reduction, etching, bonding, filling (M-R-B); and 5- Microabrasion, etching (60 seconds), bonding, filling (M-2E-B). Ten experimental groups (n=5) were designed; 150 rectangular samples (10 in each group) with a cross-sectional area of 1×1mm2 were prepared for µTBS test. Failure mode was determined under a stereomicroscope and one specimen was selected from each group for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Results: The µTBS to normal enamel was higher than to fluorotic enamel in all groups except for group (R-B). The Maximum and minimum µTBS were noted in the group (normal, reduction, bonding) and (fluorosed, microabrasion, bonding), respectively.  Tooth reduction increased µTBS more effectively than extended etching time after microabrasion. Conclusions: Fluorosis may reduce µTBS of composite resin to enamel. Microabrasion reduced the bond strength. Tooth reduction and extended etching time increased µTBS of composite resin to both normal and fluorotic enamel.  
topic Fluorosis
Dental
Enamel Microabrasion
Dental Bonding
Composite Resins
url https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/1316
work_keys_str_mv AT mahshidmohammadibasir effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresintonormalandfluoroticenamelaftermicroabrasion
AT mohammadbagherrezvani effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresintonormalandfluoroticenamelaftermicroabrasion
AT elhamtabatabaighomsheh effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresintonormalandfluoroticenamelaftermicroabrasion
AT zahramalekhosseini effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresintonormalandfluoroticenamelaftermicroabrasion
_version_ 1724503742874648576